To view this email as a web page, click here

.
AEI's weekly digest of top commentary and scholarship on the issues that matter most

Honoring an intellectual giant

Harvey Mansfield at 90

July 9, 2022

On Wednesday, July 6, AEI and the Foundation for Constitutional Government hosted a conference on the work of Harvey Mansfield, who turned 90 this past March. Over his 60-year tenure at Harvard University, Mansfield has profoundly influenced the study of political philosophy in America. Three panels of eminent scholars, including some of Mansfield’s former students, discussed his work’s major themes, ranging from Machiavelli’s political thought to the virtues of masculinity. Mansfield concluded the day by sharing his insights into conservatism.

 

 

Lawmakers know that Social Security’s combined trust funds will be insolvent by 2035, so why haven’t they done anything? Sita Nataraj Slavov considers this question in her review of Fixing Social Security: The Politics of Reform in a Polarized Age by R. Douglas Arnold (Princeton University Press, 2022).

 

Paul H. Kupiec warns that executive orders and proposed progressive legislation could heap “new highly politicized” mandates on the Federal Reserve System, which is already “failing at its primary duty” to control inflation.

 

According to Mackenzie Eaglen, US defense planners are wasting a vital strategic resource: time. While “the Pentagon and Congress have for three decades delayed modernization,” she writes, “our adversaries have capitalized on the time America has under-exploited.”

 

In West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, the US Supreme Court invoked the major questions doctrine to limit the power of federal regulators. Daniel Lyons explains the decision’s doctrine and its implications for regulating Big Tech.

Fast-Tracking Ukraine: Why Granting Membership Will Benefit the EU

In a brief for the European Policy Information Center, Dalibor Rohac advocates fast-tracking Ukraine’s membership in the European Union. Pointing to the economic and political benefits of prior EU enlargements for both “old” and “new” member countries, Rohac says that the benefits of Ukrainian accession outweigh the costs, including potential effects on the bloc’s decision-making. He also argues that past political and economic conditions for EU accession imposed on postcommunist candidate members need not be imposed on Ukraine, which already has to strengthen its institutions to survive the current conflict. Rohac asserts that Ukraine “has amply demonstrated” its commitments to liberal democracy and the rule of law “by actively defending those values against a barbaric act of aggression.”

 

 

More from AEI
RESEARCH AND COMMENTARY

A Conservative Revolutionary

Brad Littlejohn
National Affairs

Who’s Behind Joe Biden’s Leftward Lunge?

Michael Barone
Washington Examiner

What Turkey Got for Letting Sweden and Finland Join NATO

Elisabeth Braw
Defense One

The Huge Political Mistake the January 6 Committee Could Easily Avoid

Jonah Goldberg
Dispatch

Consequences of the 1968 Washington, DC, Civil Disturbance

Stan Veuger, Leah Brooks, and Jonathan Rose
AEI Economic Policy Working Paper Series

PODCASTS AND VIDEOS

What Is Going on with the War on Fossil Fuels?

Marc A. Thiessen and Danielle Pletka
What the Hell Is Going On?

I Survived the Kremlin’s Assassination Attempts

Giselle Donnelly, Dalibor Rohac, and Oleksiy Goncharenko
The Eastern Front

What Are the Goals of Congressional Budgeting?

Kevin R. Kosar and Paul Winfree
Understanding Congress

An Update on the Global Intellectual Property Landscape

Shane Tews and Michael Rosen
Explain to Shane

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

The only defense of President Biden’s reckless budget policy is that Jerome Powell’s Federal Reserve pursued an even more irresponsible monetary policy by keeping interest rates at their zero bound and by allowing the broad money supply to increase by some 40% over a two-year period.

Desmond Lachman