Supervisors Pass Faux Fourplex Bill
The Board of Supervisors passed a faux fourplex bill that undermines state law and makes it harder, not easier, to build fourplexes on city land. The Frisc quoted YIMBY Annie Fryman:
Annie Fryman — who as state Sen. Scott Wiener’s top housing advisor from 2016 to 2020 wrote several housing bills, including the updated state mandates — called the new city bill “actively harmful.” Under SB 9, “you have a clear path of building a fourplex,” Fryman said, but the new law “replaces a clear way with an impossible way and pretends it’s a victory for housing."
The San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board blasted the Board of Supervisors:
[...]the supervisors’ housing bill will do nothing to spur denser development in exclusionary neighborhoods.
And they know it.
A planning department feasibility study shows that developers trying to navigate the bill’s restrictions will lose money by the handfuls should they try to build denser housing on a formerly single-family plot.
Cue the chorus of boo-hoos. But guess what happens when developers are guaranteed to lose money? They don’t build anything.
Unfortunately, this Board of Supervisors continues to go backwards on housing with their faux-housing ballot measure. Housing is popular, and that's why we are are taking the Affordable Homes Now ballot measure to the voters in November.
High housing costs drove young adults away during COVID
The SF Standard finds that over two-thirds of the 58,000 people who left the city between 2020 and 2021 were young adults aged 20-34, despite being only 28% of SF's population. A major driver of the exodus was the high cost of housing. SF YIMBY believes San Francisco must build more housing to keep young people in the city and grow the next generation.