Parsing Immigration Policy Podcast

[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fbiden-v-texas-remain-in-mexico-and-the-bigger-questions Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fbiden-v-texas-remain-in-mexico-and-the-bigger-questions)
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
Biden v. Texas: Remain in Mexico and the Bigger Questions ([link removed])
Follow Parsing Immigration Policy on Ricochet ([link removed]) , Apple Podcasts ([link removed]) , Amazon Music ([link removed]) , Spotify ([link removed]) , Stitcher ([link removed]) , Google Podcasts ([link removed])

Washington, D.C. (July 2, 2022) – The Supreme Court finished its 2021-2022 term with the release of Biden v. Texas, a case brought against the administration by the states of Texas and Missouri. Most of the media attention has focused on the Court’s finding that the Biden administration may rescind the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) – often referred to as the “Remain in Mexico” – policy. But receiving little attention is that the key issues in the matter were remanded to the lower courts. These are the issues that will have lasting impact on immigration policy and how it is enforced.

Today’s episode of Parsing Immigration Policy ([link removed]) highlights the issues that are left to be resolved, which will likely be making their way to the Supreme Court: Does the immigration law require the Department of Homeland Security to detain illegal migrants? Can the executive release on parole hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants? These questions go to the ability of the executive to simply refuse to enforce immigration laws.

To discuss this issue, we have brought together two individuals with extensive knowledge of immigration policy, including historical background, on the executive, judicial, and congressional levels. Andrew Arthur, Resident Fellow in Law and Policy at the Center, is a former immigration judge and counsel on the House Judiciary Committee, where he performed oversight of immigration issues. George Fishman, Senior Legal Fellow at the Center, served as DHS Deputy General Counsel and Acting Chief Counsel for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services under the Trump administration, after spending two decades as Republican Counsel for the U.S. House Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee with jurisdiction over immigration.

Visit Website ([link removed])
Donate ([link removed])
Related Articles:

Biggest Casualty of SCOTUS Remain in Mexico Opinion: Transparency ([link removed])
Biden v. Texas: MPP May End, but Main Issue Is Unresolved ([link removed])
SCOTUS: Courts Cannot Enjoin Termination of MPP ([link removed])
Narrow MPP Ruling Punts on the Real Question ([link removed])
Biden Has No Policy to Deter Illegal immigration, But The Fight Isn’t Over Yet ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Google Plus ([link removed])
** LinkedIn ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
Center for Immigration Studies
1629 K St., NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
USA

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])

This is the Center for Immigration Studies CISNews e-mail list.