On Thursday, the Supreme Court, following a pattern of deeply concerning decisions, dropped its ruling on West Virginia v EPA. The outcome is nothing to celebrate, but on the heels of a ruling that stripped away women’s autonomy over their own medical decisions, it could have been worse. Let’s set a few things straight.
What was the main decision here?
The Supreme Court’s decision interpreted Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have the authority to develop a sector-wide emissions standard, which would have forced utilities to close coal and natural gas plants and replace them with clean generation like nuclear, solar, wind, hydro, or geothermal.
How does this impact the US decarbonization strategy?
Under this new ruling, the EPA still has the authority to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, both under the Clean Air Act and other provisions, by ordering every individual power plant to reduce emissions using viable technologies. This could be through installation of carbon capture technology, co-firing fossil fuels with hydrogen or natural gas, or instituting efficiency upgrades. Even emissions trading and averaging remain on the table.
What is the larger issue with this ruling?
The Court’s decision relies heavily on the notion of the “Major Questions Doctrine.” A legal theory favored by Conservative judges, the doctrine states that agencies cannot implement any policies or address legal questions that would have “major” economic or political impact without specific authorization from Congress. This is an issue because Congress and the Courts have traditionally recognized their own limitations and deferred to agencies, and their specialized expertise, to interpret and carry
out policies. Now, agencies are likely to be much more cautious in interpreting the scope of their authority unless it is explicitly spelled out by Congress. This could have a chilling effect on federal agencies. With Congress in increasing gridlock, it is unlikely the legislature would be able to come to the rescue and resolve the confusion.
What’s Next?
Thankfully, the EPA has not lost its ability to regulate emissions and as such, must continue to do so through smart policies that will target heavy-polluting sectors like industry and transportation. Congress must work alongside the EPA, and other agencies, and pass a robust budget reconciliation package that will help roll out the clean energy technology we need to make serious dents in our emissions. We still have the capability of addressing climate change and we need to use every tool at our disposal to
do so.
Read Josh’s take here.
|