Beware of campaign ads putting a price on a candidate's policies.

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
An update from FactCheck.org
Photo by Sharon McCutcheon on Unsplash


** Political Price Tags
------------------------------------------------------------

In political campaigns, TV ads often try to warn voters about how an opposing candidate’s policies would affect them. Or cost them. But beware.

Case in point: a TV ad from the National Republican Senatorial Committee claims John Fetterman, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania, has “embraced parts of the Green New Deal that’d cost you 50,000 bucks a year.”

Given that the median household income ([link removed]) in the U.S. is about $65,000, that’s … a lot of money. But as Deputy Managing Editor Rob Farley explains, the figure is a speculative estimate of what it would cost to achieve the goals of the Green New Deal. And more importantly, there’s no evidence that Fetterman supports the policies that estimate includes.

Fetterman says he “never supported the Green New Deal,” which was a nonbinding resolution introduced in the U.S. House in 2019 with lofty goals to “achiev[e] net-zero greenhouse gas emissions” through a “10-year national mobilization effort.” The effort would include upgrading buildings to be more efficient and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation and agriculture. The resolution is big on ideas but short on specifics.

Fetterman does, however, support a longer-term transition away from fossil fuels -- “a balanced and gradual energy transition spanning decades,” his campaign told us, “that respects Pennsylvania communities that depend on the fossil fuel industry.”

As for the $50,000 estimate, that comes from the free-market think tank the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which admittedly had to make a lot of assumptions to put a price tag on what households in Pennsylvania, and those in four other states, might end up paying to reach the Green New Deal’s goals. Experts have told us before that it’s tough to estimate a cost for the too-vague resolution.

Fetterman faces Republican nominee Dr. Mehmet Oz in the November general election to replace outgoing Republican Sen. Pat Toomey.

For more, see the full story, “NRSC’s Misleading Green New Deal Attack on Fetterman ([link removed]) .”
HOW WE KNOW
After at least 2,000 cattle died of apparent heatstroke following a heat wave in Kansas, social media posts baselessly suggested the deaths were part of a conspiracy about the food supply. To get the facts, we contacted the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and the Kansas Livestock Association. Spokespeople for both explained ([link removed]) that the hot and humid weather created heatstroke conditions for the cattle.
FEATURED FACT
The chickenpox vaccine is a two-dose vaccine made from weakened, or attenuated, varicella-zoster virus, which is around 90% effective ([link removed]) in preventing the disease. While some people who are vaccinated later get shingles -- a disease caused by reactivation of the dormant chickenpox virus -- the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says ([link removed]) this is “much less common after vaccination than after chickenpox disease.”
WORTHY OF NOTE
Fact-checkers from around the world are meeting this week in Oslo, Norway, for GlobalFact 9 ([link removed]) , the ninth summit hosted by the International Fact-Checking Network. FactCheck.org Director Eugene Kiely is there, and he spoke on a panel about tackling misinformation in Spanish in the United States. (You can see all of the articles we have published in Spanish here ([link removed]) .)

This is the first in-person GlobalFact after a two-year shift to virtual conferences due to the coronavirus pandemic.
REPLY ALL

Reader: So you have made hundreds of statements stating that the coronavirus vaccine is totally safe. Now it’s been made very clear that it is not totally safe.

Do you have plans to go back and correct all of your false statements?

FactCheck.org Science Editor Jessica McDonald: Clinical trials and subsequent studies and ongoing safety monitoring have shown the COVID-19 vaccines to be safe and effective, but we have never stated that they are “totally safe.” In fact, we have been careful to say that no vaccine is 100% safe ([link removed]) , and have taken pains to explain ([link removed]) the low, but real, risks of vaccination. For the two most used vaccines in the U.S., those include rare events, such as serious allergic reactions and cases of myocarditis or pericarditis ([link removed]) (inflammation of the heart or its surrounding tissue).

As with any medical product, the question about safety is whether the benefits outweigh the risks -- and to date, the evidence is quite clear that the benefits do outweigh the risks. So no, we don’t plan to correct our statements, because there is no need.

We will, however, be sure to share any safety concerns with the vaccines that may emerge in the future and will continue to provide accurate information about vaccine safety to our readers.


** Wrapping Up
------------------------------------------------------------

Here's what else we've got for you this week:
* "Social Media Swirls With Unsupported Claims About Cause of Justin and Hailey Bieber’s Medical Conditions ([link removed]) ": Pop star Justin Bieber announced he has Ramsay Hunt syndrome, a form of facial paralysis caused by a reactivation of the virus that causes chickenpox. Social media posts have claimed his condition was caused by COVID-19 vaccination, but there is no established link between vaccination and the syndrome. Some posts have also baselessly claimed vaccination was behind a mini-stroke suffered by Bieber’s wife, Hailey.
* "Kansas Cattle Died After Unusual Heat Wave, Contrary to Baseless Claims Online ([link removed]) ": At least 2,000 cattle have died following a heat wave in southwestern Kansas. Although the cattle apparently died of heatstroke, social media posts have made baseless claims suggesting that the deaths might be part of a larger conspiracy theory about the food supply.

Y lo que publicamos en español ([link removed]) (English versions are accessible in each story):
* "Publicaciones en redes distorsionan cuestionable estudio sobre vacunación contra el COVID-19 y llamadas a servicios médicos de emergencia ([link removed]) ": Estudios han encontrado que el COVID-19 aumenta el riesgo de enfermedades cardíacas y que los beneficios de las vacunas contra el COVID-19 superan a los riesgos en mujeres y hombres en todos los grupos de edad. Pero publicaciones en las redes sociales han malinterpretado y publicitado un criticado estudio que dice haber identificado una correlación entre llamadas a servicios médicos de emergencia por eventos cardiacos y la tasa de vacunación en Israel.

Have a question about COVID-19 and the vaccines? Visit our SciCheck page ([link removed]) for answers. It's available in Spanish ([link removed]) , too.
Donate to Support Our Work ([link removed])

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2022 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=ef9159042d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_06_23_07_54&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-ef9159042d-48392213)
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=ef9159042d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_06_23_07_54&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-ef9159042d-48392213)
.

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania . 202 S 36th St. . Philadelphia, Pa 19104 . USA