Hey Young Dems,
We are sending out the proposed EBYD Bylaw amendments for everyone to have and review. These will be discussed at tomorrow's meeting so please go over them to provide whatever input you may have. We look forward to hearing from everyone!
Draft Insertions to East Bay Young Democrats Bylaws:
Ranked-Choice Voting
Endorsements
Text in boxes is notes, not part of proposed bylaws.
Definitions
“Election voters”: voters in a local, state, or federal election
“Endorsement voters”: EBYD members voting on a potential EBYD endorsement
A. One- or Two-Choice Elections
For endorsements in all election types where election voters have only one or two listed choices
on the ballot, including yes/no ballot measures and races with one or two candidates, the EBYD
endorsement ballot shall contain the election choices eligible for endorsement as well as “No
Endorsement” and “No Position”, and each endorsement voter shall have one vote. An
endorsement will be made if one of the election options receives at least 60% of all votes cast,
including “No Endorsement” in the denominator but excluding “No Position”.
For election types where election voters have three or more listed choices on the ballot, one of
the methods B through D shall be used. The EBYD board may by two-thirds majority and with
notice to membership adopt protocols to clarify, but not amend, the following procedures.
This section does not apply to elections where two candidates are on the ballot but two
candidates will be elected: section (D) below applies to such elections.
B. Multiple Votes, One Seat
For endorsements in all election types where election voters have more than one vote to cast,
but only one candidate will be elected - e.g., Ranked-Choice Voting - the following procedure
shall be used.
The ballot shall leave space for each endorsement voter to rank as many candidates as are
eligible for endorsement, in order from 1, most preferred, to last, least preferred, plus one
additional space. The ballot shall instruct endorsement voters not to rank candidates they do not
wish EBYD to endorse, and shall instruct them of the availability and meaning of “No
Endorsement” and “No Position” as options.
EBYD will make endorsements of no more than three candidates based on the results of the
vote tally, noting the rank order of support received.
In all of the following calculations, a candidate’s share of votes shall be defined as the ballots
that select them at the top (#1 or reallocated choices) divided by the total of all ballots, excluding
those that indicated “No Position”, but including those that indicated “No Endorsement”. “No
Endorsement” shall never be reallocated. If all of an endorsement voter’s ranked candidates are
eliminated and there is neither “No Position” nor “No Endorsement” anywhere, the ballot will still
be counted in the denominator for the share of votes.
Intention behind continuing to count such ballots is that these are cases where the voter did
not indicate whether their final preference was “no endorsement” or “no position”, and if they
didn’t say, we want to be cautious about reducing the 60% threshold where possibly that’s not
their intention.
Membership could indicate a different preference on this matter.
If a ballot ranks the same candidate in multiple spaces, the counting will skip those repeats. If a
ballot indicates “No Position” in rank order above a named candidate, that candidate will be
considered before the ballot is removed from the tally. If a ballot indicates “No Endorsement” in
rank order above a named candidate, that lower candidate will not be considered.
i. Bottom-up reallocation
In the first phase, all the candidates will be counted by number of #1 rankings they received
from endorsement voters, and their vote shares will be calculated.
If one candidate’s share is at least 60%, they will be considered the winner of this endorsement
round, and the process will skip to (ii) below. After such an endorsement, if the maximum
endorsement number has not been reached, the process will skip to (ii) below.
If there is no endorsed candidate, the candidate with the lowest vote share will be eliminated
from the count and the ballots of the voters who ranked that candidate #1 will be reallocated to
the option they indicated next. In the case of ties, see (iii) below.
After reallocation, the shares will be recalculated. If a 60% winner is identified, they will be
endorsed and the process will skip to (ii) below. If not, this process of bottom-up reallocation and
share recalculation will repeat until the first of: (a) a 60% winner has been identified, or (b) only
two candidates remain, neither of which have 60%.
If on discussion the club prefers not to endorse more than one candidate, edit above deleting
(B)(ii) on top-down allocation, and in the paragraph further up, edit to “EBYD may make
endorsements of no more than three candidates”.
Or, if the club prefers for simplicity to endorse no more than two candidates, edit “three” to
“two” above and no other edits are required.
ii. Top-down reallocation
Eliminate the top, endorsed, candidate identified in (i) above and reallocate the ballots of those
who voted for that candidate to their next choices.
Then, return to the bottom-up reallocation process in (i) above to see if an additional winner with
at least 60% support can be found.
iii. Ties
In case two or more candidates each have the fewest #1 votes, or the most, it is necessary to
pick one to eliminate before the other in the order above. First, they will be compared by how
many #2 (or next-in-order) rankings they have; if there is still a tie, by #3 rankings; and so forth.
In the rare event that all rankings have been examined and they are still tied, a random process
will be used to determine which candidate is eliminated before the next. This random choice and
its outcome will be disclosed as part of the ballot disclosure.
iv. Ballot disclosure
In elections where ballots are reallocated, all ballot choices and ranks will be disclosed in an
anonymized form that does not show any handwriting or other means of identifying voters. All
calculations made (reallocations, vote share calculations, etc.) will be disclosed in a
comprehensible format. This disclosure shall be accessible upon request to any EBYD member
eligible to vote in that election. If a computer program is used to perform the tally, the source
code will also be accessible.
C. One Vote, One Seat
In elections where each election voter has only one vote, and the election will pick a single
officeholder (e.g., top-two primaries and nonpartisan primaries), the same process as in (B)
above shall be followed, except that EBYD shall endorse no more than one candidate, and no
top-down reallocation as in (B)(ii) shall be used.
D. Multiple Votes, Multiple Seats
In elections where each election voter has more than one vote, and the election will pick two or
more officeholders (e.g., at-large elections), no reallocation mechanism will be used. Each
endorsement voter will be allowed to cast the same number of votes as the election voter will
have. Candidate(s) that pass the threshold, as a percent of total votes cast shall be endorsed.
The threshold shall be 60% divided by the number of officeholders to be chosen: 30% for two
candidates, 20% for three, etc. No Endorsement and No Position shall be options, and No
Endorsement, but not No Position, votes shall be in the vote denominator.
EBYD will endorse no more than the number of officeholders to be chosen, and will not endorse
in rank order. If more candidates than this number pass the threshold, only the highest
vote-getters will be endorsed.
This is the same procedure we already have for such elections, just written out in more detail.
(Example: Alameda City Council)
In Community,
Victor E. Flores, EBYD Director of Communications
"The revolution has always been in the hands of the young. The young always inherit the revolution."
— Huey P. Newton