No images? Click here Welcome to The Corner. In this issue, we take a closer look at oligopoly causing soaring prices in the U.S. home-building sector; grade the Biden Administration’s on its handling of food and farming consolidation; and offer insights into the baby formula shortage.
Luke Goldstein As rents soar in metropolitan areas across the country — by a national average of 12% this year — there is no shortage of culprits to blame. The reopening of offices after the pandemic, the end of Covid-era rent restrictions, and soaring real estate valuations all play a role. Then there’s the buying up of homes by investment funds like Blackstone, as we reported in February. But there’s another factor that’s been largely overlooked: an oligopoly of homebuilders that have cornered construction capacity in many major cities and surrounding suburbs. Less competition allows large firms to build fewer homes and keep prices high. And indeed, perhaps the single biggest source of the rent crisis is simply that America is building too few new homes. By most estimates, our national housing stock falls short by around 4 million homes. "We're seeing large builders using their market power to decrease the housing supply for their own benefit," said Luis Quintero, a professor at Johns Hopkins’ Carey Business School who co-authored a paper investigating homebuilder concentration. As data from Builder Magazine shows, the nation’s top 10 builders capture 63% of the market share in the 25 fastest-growing home markets, compared to just 34% before the great housing crash of 2008. And these national market figures strongly understate the problem, as the level of concentration is often much higher in local and regional markets. A granular analysis by Johns Hopkins researchers at the Carey School breaking down local housing markets with high demand details such local concentration in homebuilding. The number of builders developing new housing in most local markets dropped by a quarter from 2006 to 2015. In a handful of areas with the highest levels of concentration, two or fewer firms produced at least 90% of new housing by 2016. In part, this is due to a series of big mergers among big builders. Pulte Homes and Centex merged in 2009 to create the largest homebuilding firm in the country at the time, and in 2017 Lennar purchased CalAtlantic, combining the second and fifth largest national builders. The Johns Hopkins study confirms that such deals have contributed to the housing shortage, costing the country some 150,000 additional homes a year since the great recession, compared to if the market had been as competitive as it was in 2006. With fewer competitors, builders don't face pressures to beat out rivals and can get away with producing fewer homes while charging higher prices. The Hopkins study also confirms that such deals drive up prices, with home prices between 2013 to 2017 growing more than twice as fast in local markets as they would have if the market hadn’t consolidated. The homebuilding market became even more concentrated during the pandemic. Economist Paul Emrath of the National Association of Home Builders says the skyrocketing cost of lumber and timber, the main inputs needed for new construction, is another factor blocking new entrants to the homebuilding market. "We've been hearing from a lot of builders that the supplies they need are just getting to be totally unaffordable," he says. Here again, big homebuilders have an advantage over smaller companies since they can purchase bulk orders for large projects which make the costs more affordable.
Open Markets Institute and Farm Action hosted an in-person event this week in Washington, titled “Making the Grade? A Midterm Review of the Biden Administration’s Commitment to Food System Competition.” The panelists included Ricardo Salvador of the Union of Concerned Scientists; Carrie Balkcom of the American Grassfed Association; John Boyd, Jr., founder and president, National Black Farmers Association; Michael Gay, owner and manager, Food Fresh; and Dennis Olson of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. Angela Huffman, Sarah Carden, and Dee Laninga spoke for Farm Action, and Claire Kelloway and Barry Lynn spoke for Open Markets. The event was covered by the Financial Times, Bloomberg, Tri-State Livestock News and The Fence Post, among other outlets.
Executive director Barry Lynn testified before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights, in a hearing titled “Baby Formula and Beyond: The Impact of Consolidation on Families and Consumers.” Ginger Carney of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis; Jeanette Contreras of the National Consumers League; and Scott Lincicome of the Cato Institute also testified. Senators Klobuchar, Lee, Booker, Blumenthal, Ossof, Cruz, Blackburn, and Hawley took part in the discussion. In his testimony, Lynn said that “Ronald Reagan’s embrace of Robert Bork’s radical efficiency theory for antitrust, in combination with Bill Clinton’s embrace of Larry Summer’s radical efficiency theory for trade, resulted in the bulldozing of almost every industrial system on which we depend, and has pushed us to the brink of catastrophe.”
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Facebook will likely halt annual multimillion-dollar payments to the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal. The article said Facebook pays per year more than $20 million to the Times, more than $15 million to the Post, and more than $10 million to the Journal. In the case of the Journal, the reporters said the payments form part of a larger agreement that provides parent company Dow Jones with more than $20 million worth of “compensation.” The article also implied that the payments amounted to a form of a political deal between Facebook and the publishers. Ending the payments, the reporters wrote, “would represent the end of a certain detente in the fraught relationship between online content makers and the social-media giant.” The article marked an important win for the Open Markets Institute, which has long opposed such under-the-table payments by Facebook and Google to publishers, precisely because of the threat they pose to the independence of America’s newspapers. Open Markets efforts include this groundbreaking article, produced by its Center for Journalism & Liberty program, in April 2021 on the payments, major conferences on the topic in April 2021 and in June 2018, and efforts to encourage Congress to require a full disclosure of such payments or even to outlaw them. 🔊 ANTI-MONOPOLY RISING:
📝 WHAT WE'VE BEEN UP TO:
We appreciate your readership. Please consider making a contribution to support the continued publication of this newsletter. 📈 VITAL STAT:43%The number of minor league teams that would be eliminated under a recent consolidation of minor league teams engineered by Major League Baseball. The consolidation plays a role in the decision by the Department of Justice to ask a court to limit MLB’s existing exemption from enforcement of antitrust law. (New York Times) 📚 WHAT WE'RE READING:
NIKKI USHER'S NEW BOOK
News for the Rich, White, and Blue: How Place and Power Distort American Journalism Nikki Usher, a senior fellow at Open Markets Institute’s Center for Journalism & Liberty, has released her third book, News for the Rich, White, and Blue: How Place and Power Distort American Journalism. In her latest work, Usher offers a frank examination of the inequalities driving not just America’s journalism crisis but also certain portions of the movement to save it. “We need to radically rethink the core functions of journalism, leverage expertise, and consider how to take the best of what the newspaper ethos of journalism can offer to places that have lost geographically specific news, “ says Usher, an associate professor at the University of Illinois-Champaign. “The news that powers democracy can be more inclusive.” Usher is also the author of Making News at The New York Times (2014) and Interactive Journalism: Hackers, Data, and Code (2016). News for the Rich, White, and Blue, published by Columbia University Press, is available as a hardback, paperback and e-book. You can order your copy here. 🔎 TIPS? COMMENTS? SUGGESTIONS? We would love to hear from you—just reply to this e-mail and drop us a line. Give us your feedback, alert us to competition policy news, or let us know your favorite story from this issue. |