[Will today’s unions invest big-time in the young workers now
beginning to rebuild American labor? Or will they remain AWOL and
ensure the movement’s continued decline?]
[[link removed]]

LABOR’S JOHN L. LEWIS MOMENT  
[[link removed]]


 

Steven Greenhouse, Harold Meyerson
June 9, 2022
The American Prospect
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Will today’s unions invest big-time in the young workers now
beginning to rebuild American labor? Or will they remain AWOL and
ensure the movement’s continued decline? _

, RON ADAR/SOPA IMAGES/SIPA USA VIA AP IMAGES

 

For decades, the labor movement’s efforts to halt its long slide
have been—to speak plainly—an utter failure. The U.S. has gone
from having 35 percent of its workforce unionized in the 1950s to 20
percent in the 1980s to just 10 percent today.

But now, finally, comes a burst of unexpected hope: lopsided union
wins at more than 100 Starbucks across the nation, the landmark
unionization victory at an Amazon warehouse on Staten Island, the
first-ever unionization of an REI store, wins at two Google Fiber
stores in Kansas City, a growing campaign to organize video game
companies and Apple Stores, and undergraduate student workers at
Grinnell voting 327 to 6 to unionize. And that’s the tip of the
iceberg. This is exciting stuff. It reflects an overwhelming pro-labor
sentiment among the young, 77 percent of whom approve of unions in the
most recent Gallup poll. The same poll showed that among all
Americans, 68 percent approve of unions, the highest level since the
mid-1960s.

These numbers reflect broad public concern about the stratospheric
levels of inequality that now define our economic life, about the
emergence of a new generation of economic oligarchs, and about the
decades of wage stagnation and economic insecurity that have dragged
down tens of millions of Americans. Many Americans, most particularly
the young, feel righteous anger about this cumulative assault on the
prospect of broadly shared prosperity and a good and fulfilling life.

_MORE FROM STEVEN GREENHOUSE_
[[link removed]] | _HAROLD MEYERSON_
[[link removed]]

All this anger and energy have created the possibility of a rebirth
for American labor unions. The current wave of pro-union action could
build into something far bigger, something that reverses labor’s
decades-long decline.

But that requires something that has yet to happen: the all-out
backing of the nation’s strangely quiescent union movement. Instead
of pitching in, instead of rushing to help, most labor unions seem to
be sitting on their hands as these young workers bravely seek to
unionize. It makes you wonder what happened to the notion of
solidarity.

IN MANY WAYS, this moment resembles a landmark moment in labor
history. It was the mid-1930s, and workers in America’s
mass-production industries were flexing their muscles and seeking to
unionize. But the leaders of many craft-based unions in the American
Federation of Labor had zero interest in helping these workers
unionize. They looked down on mass-production workers as less skilled.
They were also appalled by these workers’ efforts to organize all of
a factory’s thousands of workers into one union, rather than
dividing them by craft (and then slotting them into the appropriate
craft unions). Most AFL unions turned their backs on this fledgling
movement to unionize mass-production industries.

But John L. Lewis, then president of the United Mine Workers, the
nation’s richest, most powerful union at the time, reacted very
differently. Lewis could see that wall-to-wall unionization was the
future, and along with several other union presidents (particularly
Sidney Hillman of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers), he threw his
weight behind this newfangled strategy.

This moment won’t last forever. A recession and higher unemployment
may be just around the corner.

Defying the AFL, Lewis decided to underwrite this movement of
mass-production workers: autoworkers, steelworkers, and machinery
workers. He hired more than 500 organizers to go to Detroit and Flint,
to Johnstown and Akron, to Pittsburgh and Chicago, to organize the
very factory workers his fellow union presidents had chosen to ignore.
Thanks to Lewis’s foresight, the United Mine Workers’ very deep
pockets, and the courage, solidarity, and organizing ingenuity of many
mass-production workers, a modest trickle of unionization turned into
a colossal wave. Union density among the nation’s nonagricultural
workers nearly tripled, from 12 percent in 1935 to 32 percent in 1947.

One fear—or perhaps premonition—that drove Lewis was the idea that
if the overall labor movement remained weak, that would inevitably
erode the strength even of his own mighty Mine Workers. That same
worry should weigh on today’s labor leaders. Unions can continue
stumbling along with a sliver of the workforce, but labor leaders must
ask how strong and effective their unions can remain in bargaining, in
statehouses, and in Congress, if the percentage of workers in unions
slips from 10 to 8 and then to 6 percent and below.

Lewis possessed the clarity of vision and sense of urgency to embrace
the moment. His motto might have been: Damn labor’s inertia, full
speed ahead.

That clarity and urgency are nowhere yet apparent among today’s
labor leaders. But the opportunity to act is now squarely before them.
Will they embrace the moment, or shrink from it?

BEGINNING THIS SUNDAY, the AFL-CIO will hold its first convention in
five years (it was delayed for a year because of the pandemic).
Barring a huge surprise, Liz Shuler, the federation’s well-liked
president, will be elected to a full four-year term, after having
succeeded Richard Trumka last August after he died of a heart attack.
Several labor leaders told us that Shuler wants the nation’s unions
to do considerably more to help today’s surge of unionization grow,
but also that many unions in the federation feel little urge or
compulsion to help.

As AFL-CIO president, Shuler doesn’t run the whole show. The
federation works far more by consensus, with the biggest unions
holding much of the power. According to labor leaders we spoke with,
the three biggest unions in the AFL-CIO —the American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the American
Federation of Teachers (AFT), and the United Food and Commercial
Workers (UFCW)—are saying all the right things, but haven’t yet
stepped up to provide the money, lawyers, and other resources that are
required to turn the current burst of unionization into a far larger,
more lasting wave.

If not now, when? Not only is there a surge of youth-driven organizing
in industries and companies that have not previously been organized,
but Joe Biden is the most pro-union president in U.S. history, and
his appointees at the National Labor Relations Board
[[link removed]] are
enforcing workers’ legal protections more rigorously than they’ve
been enforced during the past five decades. Moreover, millions of
workers are angry about how poorly they were treated during the
pandemic and are demanding better conditions at work. Today’s
unusually low unemployment rate has emboldened millions more, as have
the Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, and Fight for $15 movements.

This moment won’t last forever. A recession and higher unemployment
may be just around the corner. Workers might soon start feeling less
emboldened about sticking their necks out and unionizing.

And yet, organized labor remains mired in inertia. Most unions still
do very little organizing. Last June, the Teamsters said they would
launch a major effort to unionize Amazon’s warehouses, but a year
later, there is little to show for it. (In fairness, the union’s new
leadership has been in power for only two and a half months.) The
unionization wave has been going strong for six months at Starbucks,
but it hasn’t jumped to other fast-food companies like McDonald’s
or Chipotle, where many workers complain of low wages. The UFCW seems
to have all but given up seeking to unionize Walmart, Target, and many
other major retailers.

Some unions, though, have been spending heavily on organizing. The
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) underwrote the Fight for
$15’s organizing efforts and has had huge success getting states to
enact a $15 minimum wage, although it has failed to unionize any
fast-food workers. The SEIU has also been organizing health care and
airport workers, while its affiliate, Workers United, has been quietly
backing the Starbucks organizing campaign with money and organizers.
The Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union organized the REI
store in Manhattan and, with many challenged ballots still to be
counted, hopes yet to prevail in its drive to unionize an Amazon
warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama. National Nurses United has been
aggressively organizing nurses in several states, and the AFT has been
organizing charter schoolteachers, college faculty, and grad student
workers.

But there is vastly more to be done, and it’s time for organized
labor to step up.

AS JON HIATT, the AFL-CIO’s former chief of staff and general
counsel, has written for the _Prospect_
[[link removed]],
these unions and others should use this moment to form a “Coalition
of the Willing” that creates a multimillion-dollar fund to help
today’s surge of unionizing at Starbucks and other food and retail
chains. They should feed and fuel these bottom-up, youth-driven,
self-organizing efforts. This coalition should include not just
AFL-CIO unions, but also unions outside the federation, like the SEIU,
Teamsters, Carpenters, and National Education Association.

The labor movement has massive financial resources available to invest
in this project, just as Lewis’s Mine Workers did in the 1930s.
According to an in-depth analysis in _Jacobin_
[[link removed]] by
Chris Bohner, who researches corporate finances for unions,
America’s unions currently have $29 billion in net assets, of which
$13.5 billion is in cash or cash equivalents. Some of that money is
set aside for strike funds to support union members when they go on
strike. But, as Bohner writes, “From 2010 to 2020, organized labor
paid out on average $70 million a year in strike benefits, or just
0.35% of net assets annually.” To be sure, strikes have increased in
number since 2018, but even prolonged large work stoppages would still
leave plenty in the till to finance major organizing campaigns in
retail and fast food, on campuses and elsewhere.

A key mission for the AFL-CIO and Coalition of the Willing should be
to form a unified effort to organize Amazon. It would be far smarter
to have one common campaign organizing a behemoth like Amazon than to
have unions divided and fighting over jurisdictional lines. Christian
Smalls, Derrick Palmer, and the Amazon Labor Union should of course
play a major role in any unified Amazon effort, given their historic
breakthrough in Staten Island and all they have to teach labor about
bottom-up organizing at that company.

Many bottom-up unionization efforts seem ready to sprout at other
companies, like Trader Joe’s
[[link removed]],
where workers at one store have filed for recognition for an
independent union they’ve established. Such efforts badly need more
money and resources, however. Established unions can provide that
support, with the goal of maximizing union growth and worker power,
while eschewing the old jurisdictional game of which union gets the
members and dues money. Lewis and Hillman understood this when they
formed the CIO to create new unions like the United Auto Workers and
the United Steelworkers.

This ambitious organizing project, whether overseen by the AFL-CIO or
the Coalition of the Willing, will need visionary individuals to
oversee it, people with strong track records in organizing, like D.
Taylor, president of UNITE HERE. It will need inspiring
spokespersons—if you prefer, rabble-rousers—like Sara Nelson
[[link removed]],
president of the Association of Flight Attendants. (At the moment,
Nelson is busy campaigning to unionize Delta’s flight attendants.)
If unionists like Taylor and Nelson could lead these efforts, in
conjunction with the heads of those unions that have actually been
organizing, such as the SEIU’s Mary Kay Henry and the AFT’s Randi
Weingarten, that could help ramp up organizing across the nation.

One simple thing that the AFL-CIO, and indeed all of the nations’
unions, could do is work to create an accessible online guide that
explains how to organize your workplace and co-workers, while also
explaining the rights and protections that workers have when they seek
to unionize.

These unionization efforts will need plenty of lawyers, and together
the nation’s unions should assemble a stable of attorneys who are
ready to step in, for instance, when workers need help petitioning the
NLRB to hold a unionization election or when workers believe they were
illegally fired in retaliation for pushing to unionize.

FOR FAR TOO LONG, the nation’s labor movement has done far too
little organizing, a stance that many union leaders defend by saying
it’s too darn hard and expensive to win because the playing field is
tilted against unions and in favor of corporations. That position has
become harder to maintain as organizing drives by and for young
workers have racked up one important win after another, often with
overwhelming margins. And many other workers seem eager to ride this
union wave.

Today’s labor leaders and labor unions have a crucial decision to
make: Will they remain mere spectators to these efforts, thereby
increasing the chances that this very promising moment will peter out?
Or will they heed the example of John L. Lewis, and join in solidarity
with the most pro-union generation this nation has seen in 80 years?
Will they put up the money and resources required to turn this into a
watershed moment for labor?

This is the first time in decades that America’s workers have a real
opportunity to increase their power after it has steadily eroded for
half a century. If organized labor fails to come in big to help, this
may become the last time that workers have that opportunity.

_STEVEN GREENHOUSE, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation, was
a New York Times reporter for 31 years, including 19 as its labor
and workplace reporter. He is the author of the book Beaten Down,
Worked Up: The Past, Present, and Future of American Labor
[[link removed]]._

_HAROLD MEYERSON is editor at large of The American Prospect. His
email is [email protected]. Follow @HaroldMeyerson
[[link removed]]_

_Used with the permission. © The American Prospect, Prospect.org,
2022. All rights reserved. _

_THE AMERICAN PROSPECT is devoted to promoting informed discussion on
public policy from a progressive perspective. In print and online,
the Prospect brings a narrative, journalistic approach to complex
issues, addressing the policy alternatives and the politics necessary
to create good legislation. We help to dispel myths, challenge
conventional wisdom, and expand the dialogue. Support the American
Prospect [[link removed]] Click here
[[link removed]] to support the Prospect's brand of
independent impact journalism_

* Labor
[[link removed]]
* unions
[[link removed]]
* organizing
[[link removed]]
* youth
[[link removed]]
* Inequality
[[link removed]]
* AFL-CIO
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]