June 5, 2022

Read in Browser [[link removed]]

POWERED BY

Good morning and happy Sunday! This week we’re doing a deep dive on how antitrust laws and regulators impact some of the biggest deals in sports, media, and technology. The topic stems from BT Sport and Warner Bros.’ recent announcement of a potential JV that would see the two media giants share their media catalogs.

While you’re here, check out Front Office Sports Pro’s most recent Scouting Report [[link removed]] on everything you need to know about the esports market.

As always, drop me a line on Twitter at @liamkillingstad [[link removed]] if you want to continue the conversation.

Regulators Tighten on Sports and Media Deals [[link removed]]

BT/Design: Alex Brooks

Sometimes, the most exciting deals in the market never reach the finish line. Regulatory bodies often act as the ultimate arbiters of fairness for consumers and get the final say in which mergers see the light of day.

Earlier this month, British telecommunications giant BT Group and Warner Bros. announced [[link removed]] their intention to create a 50-50 joint venture for a new sports offering in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The deal is worth a reported $797 million and would create an extensive premium portfolio of sports properties.

UEFA Champions League and Europa League Premier League matchesPremiership RugbyUFCThe Olympics The Australian Open and French OpenCycling Grand Tours including the Tour de France and Giro d’Italia

One issue: What some might call the “fun police” have come knocking. The deal will undergo antitrust scrutiny from the UK’s top competition watchdog — the Competition Markets Authority.

Why is the CMA getting involved? The possibility of increased prices for consumers.

If the deal goes through, broadcasters could be charged more to carry BT Sport and Eurosport channels because of what would become a significantly larger content offering, and those higher costs would likely trickle down to consumers.

The deal comes at a time when BT has to take a serious look at its ability to continue to carry one of its most important properties — Premier League football. International and domestic broadcast rights are expected to fall somewhere in the $6 billion [[link removed].] range in the coming years, so it’s looking to Warner Bros to share the burden.

It’s unclear whether the CMA probe will end after Phase 1 or warrant a continuation onto the dreaded Phase 2 [[link removed]] — determination of lessening of competition.

What is clear, however, is that large regulatory bodies such as the CMA or the Federal Trade Commission in the U.S. can and will regulate away deals that, on the surface, seem to make sense.

Deal or No Deal?

A quick trip down memory lane: Back in 2016, 21st Century Fox owner Rupert Murdoch filed a bid to take full control of Sky Sports for $14.6 billion [[link removed]]. At the time, Murdoch and Fox already owned a 39% stake in Sky, but full ownership was just too juicy to pass up.

The CMA had other plans. The deal was blocked due to “ media plurality [[link removed]]” concerns — or how much power the resulting company would have over public opinion.

Ultimately, the block by the CMA led to Murdoch and Fox’s sale of their 39% stake to Comcast in a landmark deal that saw the telecommunications giant purchase Sky for some $38 billion. Unlike the Fox deal, the Comcast deal was not even brought to the CMA for a Phase 1 investigation.

The determination that a Murdoch-owned media empire (he also owns the Sun and the Times of London) was not in the U.K.’s public interest demonstrates just how quickly the nature of these transactions can change.

Industries other than media are also subject to the ire of the CMA.

In 2019, JD Sports acquired Footasylum for $113 million, but the deal was short-lived.In 2020, the CMA announced that it would prohibit the completed transaction due to expectations of a substantial lessening of competition.

The deal was appealed, but the companies were eventually forced to unwind the merger.

Tightening the Screws

The U.K. government proposed new laws in 2021 that would drastically lower the burden of proof needed to block a potential acquisition, particularly for larger and more strategic companies.

The measure would apply to tech companies with “ strategic market status [[link removed]]” (SMS), a new designation for those with an entrenched, powerful position in a digital market. In time, companies like Amazon, Apple, and Uber could be included if they are deemed to have SMS.

The proposed change would allow transactions that had any realistic prospect of reducing competition to be blocked.The language from the merger assessment guidelines describes the threshold as “greater than fanciful, but below 50%.”Basically, deals would require a less than 50/50 chance of potentially being anticompetitive to garner action.

There are currently only 42,300 public companies listed globally. For most, an acquisition by an SMS company is a lifeline and for many, the ultimate end goal.

If the decision to make it easier to stifle mergers goes through, companies in the technology, media, and telecommunications space are likely to feel the brunt of the regulatory burden. Startups and smaller companies in the sports ecosystem will find it increasingly difficult to be acquired.

Policing on Home Soil

The U.S. equivalent to the CMA is the FTC, and just like the CMA, it’s willing to stamp out any hint of anticompetitive behavior.

In the past year, we have seen interventions from probes to outright blocks across several prominent industries.

Nvidia’s [[link removed]] $40 billion acquisition of U.K. chip design provider Arm Ltd. was blocked by the FTC over competition concerns in late 2021.In January, Microsoft’s acquisition [[link removed]] of gaming giant Activision Blizzard received scrutiny by the commission to determine whether the deal would lead to a monopoly in “metaverse” properties.In May, the FTC announced [[link removed]] that it would be launching an investigation into Sony’s acquisition of Bungie in an aggressive probe to police tech consolidation. The Washington Commanders could soon be under investigation by the FTC [[link removed]] for engaging in “nefarious financial practices” related to ticket sales.

One of the main areas of concern on U.S. soil is data privacy — an issue that FTC chair Lina Kahn has made abundantly clear is a top priority as the global economy becomes more digitized.

Heavier regulation all around will have implications for sports-related companies down the line.

Deals like Google’s acquisition [[link removed]] of Fitbit or Flutter’s purchase of FanDuel may well be a construct of the past if regulators continue to move toward heavy regulation. While regulators aim to protect the interest of consumers, they may start becoming over eager in labeling deals as anticompetitive.

We do need to protect consumers when existing large companies plan to merge, but extending that logic further down the value chain might lead to unintended consequences. In their quest to protect consumers, I hope these governing bodies don’t unintentionally crowd out innovation.

SPONSORED BY COINBASE

The Impact of Crypto on the Sports Industry

Historically, professional sports teams and leagues have always been relatively slow to adopt change because they are rooted in tradition. In the last few years however, the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies, NFTs and blockchain technology has forced the sports world to take notice.

Sports leagues, teams, athletes and fans have quickly embraced crypto and its resulted in significant impacts on sponsorships, fan engagement, experiences and so much more. To learn more about the impact, Front Office Sports has partnered with Coinbase [[link removed]] for its latest course, Crypto in Sports Essentials [[link removed]].

This five-lesson course will help those looking to deepen their understanding of the growing connection between the blockchain and the sports industry. Participants will earn a digital verified badge to display on their social channels upon completion.

Sign up [[link removed]] for the course today.

Refer Friends, Win Merch

Ready to rep your favorite newsletter? Refer your friends and colleagues to Front Office Sports and you could win FOS merchandise.

It’s easy to spread the word. Copy and paste your unique link below and share it in an email or on your timeline.

Your custom referral link:

[link removed] [[link removed]]

Or use these one-tap sharing methods:

Email [[link removed]] Twitter [[link removed]] Facebook [[link removed]]

Your referral count: 0

If this email was forwarded to you, you can subscribe here [[link removed]].

Written by Liam Killingstad [[link removed]] Edited by Peter Richman [[link removed]]

MORE FROM FRONT OFFICE SPORTS:

The Leadoff [[link removed]] - Daily business of sports podcast

Front Office Sports Pro [[link removed]] - The most promising opportunities where sports meets industry

Front Office Sports Scoreboard [[link removed]] - The biggest stories in sports and the numbers behind them

Front Office Sports Learning [[link removed]] - Professional education at the speed of culture

Copyright © 2022 Front Office Sports. All rights reserved.

80 Pine Street Suite 3202 New York, NY 10005

Advertise [[link removed]] / Update your preferences [link removed] / Unsubscribe [link removed]