View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]
[link removed]
** Biden plans to mandate mask-wearing on airplanes - again ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Earlier this year, a federal judge declared the long-standing and highly contentious mask mandate on public transportation to be unlawful, but now, President Joe Biden is working to reimpose a federal mandate for air travel.
The overturning of the original mandate was met with widespread exultation, as videos surfaced of passengers cheering and celebrating ([link removed]) their maskless flights.
In my personal experience, I have noticed how few people have worn masks on each flight I have been on since masking became optional, and also how the overall atmosphere at airports has become less tense, all of which raises a serious question:
If huge amounts, potentially even vast majorities, of Americans are fine with going maskless into airports, then who exactly is the federal government doing this for?
It would be one thing if Americans chose to wear masks. It is another thing altogether for the government to make that choice top-down.
More often than not, it seems the prolonging of these mandates has been an experiment to test the American people’s willingness to comply, especially considering the questionable efficacy of mask mandates.
According to a report ([link removed]) in the reputable New England Journal of Medicine, “wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection."
They added, "In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
The University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy admitted ([link removed]) that “the data supporting the effectiveness of a cloth mask or face covering are very limited.”
Additionally, The Multiple Sclerosis Center of Arizona compiled a list of over 150 studies ([link removed]) on the topic of mask effectiveness - or lack thereof - and ultimately concluded that the “evidence has been stable and clear that masks do not work to control the virus and they can be harmful and especially to children.”
But even publications that tout the wearing of masks, including, for example, the New York Times, have admitted that mask mandates ([link removed]) “have not done much to reduce Covid caseloads over the past two years,” noting that Covid has spread at similar rates in cities both prone and resistant to masking.
Click Here to Read More! ([link removed])
** More News Here!
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** Trudeau proposes handgun ban, disregarding recent backlash & protests, will Biden follow? ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** Corruption at its finest: FBI has office inside law firm that represents Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** Convention of States can stop feds from forcing us into WHO’s global pandemic treaty ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
[link removed]
** Don't miss this COS at Home webinar featuring BlazeTV's Steve Deace! ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 Convention Of States Action, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you wanted us to send you updates on the Convention of States Project.
Our mailing address is:
Convention Of States Action
5850 San Felipe Street
Suite 580A
Houston, TX 77057
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
