The Latest from the Prospect
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
 
MAY 31, 2022
Meyerson on TAP
Building Our New Electric Fleet
In a signal victory last week, an activist group prevailed on a major bus manufacturer to hire its workers from local, historically disadvantaged communities.
In 1997, after a campaign of several years’ duration, the Los Angeles City Council voted to establish the nation’s first living wage ordinance. Under its terms, businesses with which the city had contracted to do its work—for which the city’s taxpayers were footing the bill—were required to pay their employees a specified, decent wage, as well as offering them a modicum of benefits.

The ordinance, and the campaign that pressured the council to enact it, were the brainstorm of Madeline Janis, the attorney who’d founded and led the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy (LAANE). "Taxpayers should not be subsidizing poverty-wage jobs," Janis argued.

At roughly the same time, in tandem with another progressive community organization, LAANE also persuaded a number of local developers to sign community benefits agreements (CBAs), which obligated those developers to hire local residents—in effect, disproportionately minorities and women—on major construction projects. Previously, such projects were built by a heavily white male workforce that lived nowhere near the city’s center, even as those projects uprooted the self-same minority communities who’d lived and worked there. With the coming of CBAs, minorities began to gain much greater entry to union construction jobs that offered pay and benefits that otherwise would have remained out of reach.

As living wage ordinances and community benefits agreements spread across the nation’s cities in the aughts, Janis moved on to an even more challenging task, or, more precisely, a dual task: bringing manufacturing back to America, and ensuring that the jobs created in the process hired locally and from historically disadvantaged communities. She created Jobs to Move America (JMA), which sought to ensure that the new railcars and buses that city and county governments purchased (an increasing number of which are electric) were manufactured in the U.S. by the same kind of workers who’d benefited from CBAs. (In the last decades of the past century, when a transit district had bought new railcars, they had had to buy them from abroad, as no one was building them in the States until JMA came along.)

Last week, Jobs to Move America won a signal victory when bus manufacturer New Flyer agreed that 45 percent of its new hires would go to minorities, women, and veterans at its Anniston, Alabama, plant, where it manufactures buses under a $500 million contract with Los Angeles’s L.A. Metro transit district. New Flyer has a number of factories across the nation that now may also come to adopt similar standards. And as the largest purchasers of railcars and buses are the transit authorities of major cities, where Democrats dominate politically, it’s likely that those authorities will favor such standards in their contracts going forward, and that Jobs to Move America will take manufacturers to court if they don’t comply. It required the combination of these two strategies to convince New Flyer to come to terms.

Like the railcars and buses themselves, the campaign to bring manufacturing home, with a representative workforce at good wages, has many parts. Earlier today, United Auto Workers president Ray Curry and American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten called on local governments to purchase their new electric fleets from unionized and local workers. The transit allocations in President Biden’s $1.2 trillion infrastructure act certainly give local governments the means to do that. The campaigns waged by Jobs to Move America—modeled in part on the campaigns Janis herself initiated a quarter-century ago—gives them the way.

After Hyper-Globalization
What should the next trading system be? Can we restore the capacity of the U.S. to produce—and of all nations to regulate capitalism? BY ROBERT KUTTNER
Clock Ticking on Big Tech Accountability Bills
The industry, and a couple of nervous Democrats, want to keep the legislation forever off the Senate calendar. Chuck Schumer is the key decision-maker. BY DAVID DAYEN
After Ukraine, Voters Want Climate Solutions
New polling shows a bolstered desire for a rapid transition to green energy. BY STANLEY B. GREENBERG
How Rich People Stole Identity Politics
Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò charts a course between cynical corporate liberalism and right-wing anti-wokeness. BY PROSPECT STAFF
 
Click to Share this Newsletter
Facebook
 
Twitter
 
Linkedin
 
Email
 
The American Prospect, Inc.
1225 I Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC xxxxxx
United States
Copyright (c) 2022 The American Prospect. All rights reserved.

To opt out of American Prospect membership messaging, click here.
To manage your newsletter preferences, click here.
To unsubscribe from all American Prospect emails, including newsletters, click here.