From The Progressive <[email protected]>
Subject "Why does this only happen in your country?"
Date May 28, 2022 4:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this email in your browser ([link removed])

Dear Progressive Reader,

On May 24, in Uvalde, Texas, nineteen students and two teachers were murdered by a heavily armed eighteen-year-old, who was also killed by police in the incident. This tragedy is the second most deadly shooting at an elementary or high school to date. In 2012, a twenty-year-old murdered twenty children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut. In 2018, a nineteen-year-old killed seventeen and injured seventeen others at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, and in 2018, almost exactly four years before the Uvalde killings, a seventeen-year-old murdered ten and wounded ten others at Santa Fe High School, in a Texas town less than five hours from Uvalde.

At the time of the Santa Fe shootings, Texas lieutenant governor Dan Patrick told ([link removed]) residents and the media that the answer was “fewer doors” at schools. His comments drew a firestorm of sarcastic retorts ([link removed]) on social media: “Guns don’t kill people, doors do.” One Texas housing official even noted that “Texas has stricter regulations for doors than it does for guns.” The oft repeated ([link removed]) rhetoric of “hardening the target” that follows these tragic incidents begs the question – “Why must our schools be ‘targets’?”

As Education Week reports ([link removed]) , there have been twenty-seven school shootings so far this year, and 119 since 2018 (the last year illustrated in the chart above). In almost every incident, the killings were perpetrated by a young man between eighteen and twenty-one years old, using an easily available, legally purchased, semi-automatic weapon with a large-capacity magazine for ammunition. Many easy-to-implement, and publicly popular ([link removed]) , regulations have been proposed—background checks, “red flag” laws, age restrictions, restrictions on large capacity magazines, restrictions on military-style assault weapons. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban, enacted in 1994, expired in 2004. During the life of the ban, mass shootings declined ([link removed]) ; since its expiration, they
have risen dramatically ([link removed]) . There are things that can be done. They must be done now.

As Mark Fiore illustrates ([link removed]) , many of the politicians who are currently offering only “thoughts and prayers” to the families in Uvalde, are also speaking at the annual convention of the National Rifle Association this weekend in Houston, Texas (about 275 miles from Uvalde). The NRA has done more than any other single organization to promote the “gun culture” of the United States, which makes us a dramatic outlier ([link removed]) in the entire world ([link removed]) . Frank Smyth, author ([link removed]) of The NRA: An Unauthorized History, reports for our website this week on the convention, noting ([link removed]) , “the price of the tall tales they’ve told—about everything from Reconstruction to gun reform—is
being paid by the murdered children and their parents along with other victims and survivors of gun violence.”

Also on our website this week, Robert Davis looks at ([link removed]) the nation’s affordable housing shortage and what can be done about it; Christian Thorsberg writes about ([link removed]) a new museum exhibit that centers Native people in its design and implementation; Ed Rampell reviews ([link removed]) a new film that unravels the missing eighteen-and-one-half minutes of Watergate tape from fifty years ago; and Jeff Abbott reports ([link removed]) on a Guatemalan judge facing death threats for pursuing justice. Plus Steph Black describes ([link removed]) the activism opposing Oklahoma’s new extreme anti-abortion bill, and Mike Ervin asks
([link removed]) what else the Supreme Court might go after next, following the current threat to Roe v. Wade.

Please keep reading, and we will keep bringing you important articles on these and other issues of our time.

Sincerely,
Norman Stockwell
Publisher

P.S. – If you like this weekly newsletter, please consider forwarding it to a friend. If you know someone who would like to subscribe to this free weekly email, please share this link: [link removed].

P.P.S. – If you don’t already subscribe to The Progressive in print or digital form, please consider doing so today ([link removed]) . Also, if you have a friend or relative who you feel should hear from the many voices for progressive change within our pages, please consider giving a gift subscription ([link removed]) .

P.P.P.S. – Thank you so much to everyone who has already donated to support The Progressive! We need you now more than ever. If you have not done so already, please take a moment to support hard-hitting, independent reporting on issues that matter to you. Your donation today will keep us on solid ground in 2022 and will help us continue to grow in the coming years. You can use the wallet envelope in the current issue of the magazine, or click on the “Donate” button below to join your fellow progressives in sustaining The Progressive as a voice for peace, social justice, and the common good.
Donate ([link removed])

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 The Progressive, Inc.

P.O. Box 1021 • Madison, Wisconsin 53701 • (608) 257-4626

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis