From Tom Fitton <[email protected]>
Subject Getting Results in Court!
Date May 26, 2022 3:12 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Judicial Watch just announced a major victory for cleaner elections!
We settled our federal lawsuit against North Carolina after the state
removed over 430,000 ineligible names from its voter rolls!
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

[Judicial Watch]

Dear Judicial Watch Member,

On May 16th, a California court found California’s gender quota law
for corporate boards unconstitutional in _Robin Crest et al. v. Alex
Padilla_, a lawsuit that JUDICIAL WATCH filed in 2019 on behalf of
three California taxpayers.

The verdict in this case comes after a 28-day trial, and it follows a
similar ruling in JUDICIAL WATCH’S favor last month finding
California’s diversity mandate for corporate boards
unconstitutional.

Thanks to the generous commitment of our members across the country,
we are winning major victories for the core American value of equal
protection under the law!

And today, I urge you to join with us
[[link removed]]
so that we can
keep winning on behalf of the rule of law and for the American
people.

Contribute
[[link removed]]

Our most recent victory came out of our challenge to a 2018 law, known
as Senate Bill 826, which requires every publicly held corporation
headquartered in California to have at least one director “_who
self-identifies her gender as a woman_” on its board of directors by
December 31, 2019. The law also requires corporations to have up to
three such persons on their boards by December 31, 2021, depending on
the size of the board.

Judicial Watch argued that the quota for women on corporate boards
violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California
Constitution…and California Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis
agreed with us!

The Court found that “_putting more women on boards demonstrated
that the Legislature’s actual purpose was gender-balancing, not
remedying discrimination_.”

And, “_There is no Compelling Governmental interest in remedying
discrimination in the board selection process because neither the
Legislature nor Defendant could identify any specific, purposeful,
intentional and unlawful discrimination to be remedied.”_

This is the second California court decision finding that quotas for
corporate boards are unconstitutional. The radical Left’s
unprecedented attacks on anti-discrimination laws have suffered
another stinging courtroom defeat at the hands of JUDICIAL WATCH
attorneys!

JUDICIAL WATCH’S legal team is helping protect the civil rights of
every American with these successful lawsuits.

But every one of our lawsuits come with real price tags attached.

That’s why I am sohopeful you will make a tax-deductible
contribution and join the Judicial Watch team today.
[[link removed]]
Your donation
will help us take on new challenges to the rule of law whenever and
wherever they arise, and help keep us on track with all our current
lawsuits and investigations

Contribute
[[link removed]]

I urge you to join with us today!

Sincerely,

Tom Fitton

President

Contribute
[[link removed]]

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 Third Street SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024

©2021, All Rights Reserved

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions
are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are
tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis