CATEGORY: TRADITION (5 min)
“In our current political culture, it seems that not only can everyone have an opinion, everyone does—and you are expected to listen to it,” writes Phillip Dolitsky in First Things.
Is this a good thing? Almost certainly not, he argues.
The surfeit of opining gives us “hot-take punditry” in politics . . . and it gives us students and scholars who are ignorantly dismissive of the past.
Educators used to know better. In the 19th century, Dolitsky writes, “imitation” of past masters was the path to creativity. “Originality” meant wrestling with the ideas of your predecessors.
We need to recover that spirit of creative imitation today:
“Students need to be told that while they need to think for themselves, they cannot truly think without first paying homage and deference to those giants who came before them.”
Do you agree that the contemporary obsession with “originality” is regressive? Read Dolitsky’s case for imitation and limitations right here.
|