From Hudson Institute Weekend Reads <[email protected]>
Subject What We Must Do to Help Ukraine Win
Date May 21, 2022 11:00 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
No images? Click here [link removed]

A Ukrainian special forces soldier observes a destroyed bridge north of Kharkiv, May 16, 2022. (Dimitar Dilkoff/ AFP)

The goal of U.S. aid should be to help Ukraine win—and not simply survive—the war. With its over-emphasis on humanitarian and diplomatic aid and the wrong mix of weapons, the Biden administration’s approach to supporting Ukraine will only extend the conflict with Russia, argue Hudson Senior Fellows Rebeccah Heinrichs [[link removed]] and Bryan Clark [[link removed]] in The Dispatch [[link removed]]. See below for key excerpts.

Read the Op-ed [[link removed]]

Key Insights

1. Unify NATO Around the Goal of Ukrainian Victory

Geopolitically, the U.S. should align with NATO allies who want to see Ukraine push out Russia. That side is led by the U.K., Poland, and those along the Black Sea—NATO’s modern front. France and Germany have so far been unwilling to be as forward-leaning, making U.S. leadership necessary. The impending additions of Finland and Sweden to the alliance adds momentum to consolidate a fiercer and visibly more courageous Western allied effort.

The United States must put unyielding pressure on European allies to do what they can do. That includes providing the food, medicine, and other services the Ukrainians need during the war, and will require to rebuild their country once this war is over. Poland has shouldered the brunt of the Ukrainian refugees, and rich Western allies, like Germany, should share the financial burden.

2. Provide Weapons that Enable a Counteroffensive

Militarily, Ukraine’s urgent need is for longer-range strike systems. Guided multiple launch rocket systems could help Ukrainian forces attack Russian supply depots and logistics lines. And MQ-9 Reaper drones could engage Russian armor across the open fields of Donetsk and Luhansk. Ukraine also needs more effective ground weapons for the Donbas, namely self-propelled howitzers like the M109 that can navigate the devastated road network of eastern Ukraine, where the US M777 towed howitzers already on their way are likely to prove useless. To help keep Russian troops from gaining more ground, the United States should provide Ukraine anti-vehicle mines, such as the Gator, that remain allowed under international mine protocols and conventions.

3. End Russia's Blockade of Odesa

U.S. and allied efforts to help Ukraine win on the ground will come to naught if Ukraine cannot break Russia’s naval blockade off Odesa. The United States should send some of its substantial inventory of Harpoons or work with Norway’s Kongsberg to provide Ukraine with some of its newer Naval Strike Missiles.

Quotes may be edited for clarity and length.

Read the Op-ed [[link removed]] Go Deeper

Deter Russia by Arming NATO Allies [[link removed]]

To deter further Russian belligerence in Europe, NATO needs to adapt and modernize its military capabilities, particularly at its forward perimeter, Bill Schneider [[link removed]] wrote in a prescient piece for The Wall Street Journal.

Read [[link removed]]

NATO and Russia’s War on Ukraine: A Conversation with NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoana [[link removed]]

A reinvigorated NATO heads toward its Madrid Summit in June, where it will unveil its first Strategic Concept since 2010. In anticipation of that event, Hudson’s Distinguished Fellow Ken Weinstein [[link removed]] hosted NATO Deputy Security General Mircea Geoana for a discussion on the future of the alliance and its role in Ukraine.

Watch [[link removed]]

Ukraine Embraces the ‘Messy Middle’ to Win the Drone War [[link removed]]

Ukraine’s drone warfare is a successful example of human-machine teaming on the battlefield. The Pentagon should take note, write Hudson Senior Fellows Bryan Clark [[link removed]] and Dan Patt [[link removed]] in the National Interest, arguing that the sweet spot in unmanned warfare operations lies somewhere between fully autonomous and remotely operated platforms.

Read [[link removed]] [[link removed]] Share [link removed] Tweet [link removed] Forward [link removed] Hudson Institute

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Fourth Floor

Washington, D.C. 20004 Preferences [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis