Why lowering academic standards isn’t the answer to the crisis on college campuses
[link removed]
CounterCurrent:
Stop the Spread
(of Lowered Standards)
Why lowering academic standards isn’t the answer to the crisis on college campuses
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Academic Standards; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - My College Students Are Not OK by Jonathan Malesic ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
In March 2020, when colleges across the country sent their students home mid-semester in an effort to “stop the spread” of COVID, they claimed that measures such as virtual instruction and modified assignments would be temporary—originally only to last two weeks, and then only until the end of the semester. Although students and professors alike suffered from the sudden switch, most were committed to sticking it out, with the reassurance that everything would be back to normal soon.
Of course, we all know the end of that story—or rather, the lack thereof. More than two years later, colleges are still switching back and forth ([link removed]) between virtual and in-person classes in response to the fluctuating number of COVID cases ([link removed]) on campus (never mind that most students are vaccinated and face little danger from contracting COVID). Accommodations such as mandatory remote options, loosened attendance policies, and lightened workloads seem to be here to stay on many campuses, forced upon faculty by both explicit requirements and internal pressures.
As the pandemic waned, however, the justification for lowered standards began to shift: instead of COVID, many administrators now point to students’ ever-worsening mental health ([link removed]) when making the case for leniency. The pressure of grades and assessments is said to be too much for today’s college students ([link removed]) , who must have lighter workloads and decreased stress, whatever the consequences to the quality of their education.
And the consequences truly have been great. Just a few days ago, the New York Times published an op-ed from Jonathan Malesic, a writing professor at Southern Methodist University, that details the damaging effects of lowered standards and loosened course structures. In the article, titled “My College Students Are Not Okay ([link removed]) ,” Dr. Malesic describes the widespread disengagement that he and other college instructors have witnessed from students over the past two years. Student performance has plummeted by nearly every measure, Dr. Malesic says, and it appears that many students have lost all motivation to learn.
Rather than continuing the race to the bottom ([link removed]) , matching the decline in student motivation and performance with ever-lowering standards, Dr. Malesic argues that faculty should respond to the crisis by restoring structure to the classroom. He writes:
Higher education is now at a turning point. The accommodations for the pandemic can either end or be made permanent. The task won’t be easy, but universities need to help students rebuild their ability to learn. And to do that, everyone involved—students, faculties, administrators and the public at large—must insist on in-person classes and high expectations for fall 2022 and beyond.…
Because it is students whose educations are at stake, they bear much of the responsibility for remaking their ability to learn. But faculty members and administrators need to give students an environment that encourages intellectual habits like curiosity, honesty and participation in a community of inquiry. These habits aren’t only the means to a good education; to a large extent, they are the education.
Students need higher standards, not lower. For evidence of how high standards help students flourish, Dr. Malesic refers his readers to the University of Dallas (UD), a small Catholic university known for its conservatism and its Great Books curriculum. Although the school switched to remote instruction in March 2020, it pivoted right back for the Fall 2020 semester and continued its teaching mostly unhampered from there on out. As a result, UD students have thrived, even amidst the chaos of the past two years. As one UD student stated: “It’s difficult, but you want it to be difficult, and you want to be a part of it because it’s difficult” [emphasis added].
Instead of forcing professors to water down their content and soften their feedback, administrators should recognize the role that rigor plays in motivating students. Erasing standards won’t solve the problems that students face—it will only mask them.
Until next week.
Marina Ziemnick
Communications Associate
National Association of Scholars
P. S. Students with an appetite for grappling with difficult ideas should consider applying for Ralston College’s new, one-year M.A. in the Humanities ([link removed]) , which begins with two months of immersive language and culture study in Greece. All students who are accepted to the program will receive a full scholarship covering both tuition and accommodation. Applications are due May 21st, so spread the word ([link removed]) !
Read More ([link removed])
For more on academic standards and COVID-19:
[link removed]
November 04, 2021
** Don't Cancel Rigor ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
David Randall
Academic rigor shapes itself to the demands of the subject, not the inquirer, and makes the student worthy of what he studies. Academic rigor is truly transformative.
[link removed]
August 24, 2021
** COVID Wars Episode II: The Vaccine Strikes Back ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
David Acevedo
As schools reopen for the fall, mask and vaccine mandates have come to the fore.
[link removed]
November 30, 2020
** University Administrators’ Pandemic Power Grab ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Neetu Arnold
Universities are taking advantage of the pandemic to "hollow out the middle," that is, to defenestrate full-time and tenured faculty from their positions of influence in the university.
[link removed]
July 07, 2020
** Curing Higher Ed in the Wake of COVID-19 ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Adam Ellwanger
The current model of higher education is utterly dysfunctional. COVID-19 has given us an unprecedented opportunity to make it work again.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
