Turns out that government itself was violating “truth in advertising” laws.

At your request: This week's California Commentary by Jon Coupal
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pasadenastarnews.com%2F2022%2F05%2F08%2Ffree-speech-and-trivial-lawsuits%2F Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pasadenastarnews.com%2F2022%2F05%2F08%2Ffree-speech-and-trivial-lawsuits%2F)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
[link removed]

[link removed]


** California Commentary
------------------------------------------------------------

You are receiving this email because you subscribed on the HJTA website, or you provided your address in response to direct mail. Please see the bottom of this message to unsubscribe.


** Free speech and trivial lawsuits
------------------------------------------------------------

By Jon Coupal

Everyone knows that the Constitution protects free speech under the First Amendment.

But many may not realize that the First Amendment also protects commercial speech, such as advertisements. Even though the level of protection afforded to commercial speech is less than that given to other kinds of speech, especially political speech, businesses still have rights about what they say.

The First Amendment is also implicated when laws require labeling for commercial enterprises. For example, it is entirely legal for government to require fast food businesses to post the calorie count on the products they serve to the public. There are innumerable other examples of required disclosures, such as gas mileage and safety ratings for automobiles and whether a newly constructed home is subject to Mello-Roos taxes.

One infamous example of “forced speech” in California was imposed via Proposition 65, passed by voters in 1986. Commercial enterprises are required to post warning labels that their products or place of business may contain substances known to cause cancer. But Prop. 65 warnings are so ubiquitous in California that they have become meaningless. They are found on everything from bread to potato chips to chocolate chip cookies. In California, it appears, everything causes cancer.

But a recent court ruling over acrylamide, a naturally occurring substance that is formed in the process of baking goods, may have reined in the absurdity of Prop. 65 warnings just a bit. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that because scientific evidence couldn’t come to a single conclusion over whether acrylamide in food and beverages can cause cancer in humans, the Prop. 65 warning signs for these products were “likely misleading.”

Turns out that government itself was violating “truth in advertising” laws.

To read the entire column, please click her ([link removed]) e ([link removed]) .

Click here to listen to this week's Howard Jarvis Podcast, "California's Budget: A Pile Of Manure With No Pony" ([link removed]) The Howard Jarvis Podcast features HJTA President Jon Coupal and VP of Communications Susan Shelley with a lively conversation that takes you inside California government in a way that's fun, interesting and sometimes scary. Check out all the recent podcasts by clicking here: [link removed]
A note to our valued members and supporters: To increase the reach of our message to as many Californians as possible, HJTA made an agreement with the Southern California News Group papers to carry Jon Coupal's weekly column. The newspapers in the group, including the Orange County Register and the Los Angeles Daily News, have added a paywall that allows only a limited number of page views per month, and then asks readers to become subscribers. HJTA is not marketing these subscriptions or receiving any payment from them. The columns are exclusive to SCNG's papers for one week and then are posted in full on HJTA's own website, www.hjta.org ([link removed]) , under "California Commentaries," where you can read them at your convenience, or read Jon's column online in all the SCNG papers at these links:
www.whittierdailynews.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.dailybulletin.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.redlandsdailyfacts.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.sgvtribune.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.ocregister.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.pe.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.dailynews.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.pasadenastarnews.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.sbsun.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.dailybreeze.com/opinion ([link removed])
www.presstelegram.com/opinion ([link removed])
Jon Coupal is the President of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA). He is a recognized expert in California fiscal affairs and has argued numerous tax cases before the courts.
HJTA is totally dependent on the voluntary support of California taxpayers.
Please consider a donation now to help us continue our work on your behalf.
[link removed]
[link removed]

============================================================
Don't Forget To Follow Us On Social Media
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
** Pinterest ([link removed])
** Pinterest ([link removed])

Copyright © 2022 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. All rights reserved.
621 S. Westmoreland Avenue, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90005

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association . 621 South Westmoreland Avenue, Suite 200 . Los Angeles, CA 90005 . USA