|
Strzok-Page Emails Show Special Treatment
of Clinton Email Witnesses
Do you remember all the cloak and dagger meetings in a parking garage in
the movie about Watergate, “All the President’s Men?” Guess what.
Barack Obama’s FBI was still looking for secret places to carry out their
efforts to protect Hillary Clinton. Here’s a quote that would work on the
big screen: “Is there an offsite somewhere in the DC area that might be
better? If so, don’t tell me where it is.”
We read this in 35
pages of records of communications between former FBI official Peter
Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa Page that show the attorney
representing three of Hillary Clinton’s aides met with senior FBI
officials. We received the documents in response to our January 24, 2018,
lawsuit
filed after the Department of Justice failed to respond to a December 4,
2017, FOIA request (Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)).
Two March 2016 emails show then-FBI General Counsel James Baker and
then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe had discussed meeting with attorney
Beth Wilkinson, who was representing Clinton aides Cheryl Mills, Heather
Samuelson, Jake Sullivan and Philippe Reines.
The FBI officials discussed holding “discreet” meetings with Wilkinson
in secure locations that were set up to avoid any “stakeouts” by the
press. (In a separate Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit,
U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said that he was “dumbfounded”
that Cheryl Mills had been given immunity and was allowed to accompany
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to her FBI interview:
I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied
under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case
where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out
she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary
Clinton email case. So I did not know that until I read the IG report and
learned that and that she had accompanied the Secretary to her
interview.
In an email exchange with Deputy Assistant Director in the
Counterintelligence Division Jonathan Moffa, Strzok discusses Clinton
aides’ laptops, and that Wilkinson said that the laptops in the FBI’s
possession did not contain Clinton’s 60,000 emails. She also said that
the two laptops that had them are the personal laptops of Mills and
Samuelson that were still in use at that time.
Strzok and Page were lead investigators in the Clinton email and Russia
collusion investigations. The newly released records include:
On March 1, 2016, an unidentified official from the FBI Office of General
Counsel asks
Baker if he’d had a chance to speak with Wilkinson, noting “CES
[Counterespionage Section] wants to reach out to discuss scheduling
additional interviews but wanted some feedback from you first.” Baker
replies, “Just did… She appreciated the heads up about the pending
press articles. She wants to meet with the DD [Deputy Director] but can
only meet on the weekends right now. I will check his availability
tomorrow.”
In a follow up email
thread on March 4, Wilkinson tells Baker that she would be able to do the
meeting with McCabe that day. Baker forwards the note to McCabe, saying
“Andy, do you want to try to do this today?”, and copies numerous top
FBI officials, including Michael Steinbach, Bill Priestap, Trisha Anderson,
and Page. Page forwards the note to Strzok. Strzok then tells Page that
he’s been “Talking to DOJ, they ([George] Toscas and CES) have strong
opinions about it. Call me.” Page replies, “He’s not calling. Don’t
worry about it.” Strzok then adds, “Also you need to know what
[redacted] and she discussed. I can tell you over lunch…”
In a March 4, 2016, email
with the subject line “Interview,” Baker emails the same top FBI
officials, saying that he’s just spoken with Wilkinson and “I think we
are now back on track. She is going to call [redacted] today or tomorrow
about scheduling the next interview. Given the witness’s personal
schedule, Beth said that it may not happen for a few weeks but she will
work that out with [redacted]. We also discussed making sure that
this is done in a secure location in a discreet way; she will work with
[redacted] and the FBI team on that as well but I said that we will make
sure that it happens in a high quality way.”
In a follow-up email sent only to Strzok, Baker writes, “She understands
that it needs to be in a SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information
Facility]. She seems more comfortable with NYFO [New York Field Office],
but I think would be open to WFO [Washington Field Office] if she can get
in and out in a discreet manner (i.e., no chance of a press stakeout or too
many people in the office seeing them and having awareness of what is going
on). Is there an offsite somewhere in the DC area that might be better? If
so, don’t tell me where it is.”
On March 20, 2016, Strzok emails
FBI Deputy Assistant Director Moffa, writing: “Big news of the day? Beth
[presumably Wilkinson] said none of the laptops we have had the original
60k [presumably Hillary’s 60,000 emails]. The two that did were - and are
- the personal laptops of Cheryl [Mills] and Heather [Samuelson].
[Redacted] That they are still using now. Funny that never cane [sic] up
before now.” Strzok forwards this email with Moffa on to Page with the
note: “My frustration.”
The new documents show Strzok expressing concern about the office of DNI
using private email in an exchange containing information regarding a
sensitive U.S.-European Community information sharing agreement. On January
31, 2016, Strzok
writes: “GIVEN EVERYTHING GOING ON WHY IS [redacted] USING A YAHOO!
ACCOUNT FOR THIS? [Emphasis in original] (Actually, apparently a Yahoo!
account from [redacted] iPad”) Make him stop!!!!!!”
Page responds: “What do you want me to do?!”
Strzok replies, “I have no idea. It’s not clear what account [redacted]
iPad used. [Redacted] at DNI is the one with the Yahoo! account. Maybe tell
[redacted] with the IC IG [Intelligence Community Inspector General]
investigating use of private servers and webmail, perhaps it’s not an
opportune time for he/DNI staff to be doing the same? I don’t know.”
(Judicial Watch had previously
reported that FBI officials used unsecure devices in discussing how the
U.S. could improve the sharing of sensitive data with the European Union
top executive governing commission.)
In a February 29, 2016 email
exchange Strzok tells Page he tried to reach “Bill” [presumably
Strzok’s boss, Bill Priestap, Assistant Director of FBI
Counterintelligence] to get him to pass some information to Baker but was
unable to via email. Page says, “Just call him.” Strzok replies, “I
can’t. This isn’t life or death and I need to give the chain of command
a few minutes to work.” Further along, Page agrees, saying, “I totally
get it. I completely hate this about our organization, but it is what it
is. Np.” Strzok responds, “It’s necessary to have a chain of command
and gatekeepers. Otherwise you’d have 790 idiots calling the GC, EADs,
and DD every day.”
The FBI will continue producing Strzok-Page documents through 2021.
These documents show that the Hillary Clinton team had advocates at the top
of the Obama FBI – no wonder their investigation of her was a sham. With
explosive material such as this, no wonder the FBI is slow-rolling the
release of Strzok-Page documents to us – wanting to wait until late 2021
to produce records!
Judicial Watch Sues For the ‘Missing’ Strzok-Page Texts
Mueller’s Office Deleted
We’ve never considered Bob Mueller’s special counsel
“investigation” of Donald Trump to be anything more than a political
vendetta, and nothing confirms this better than his office’s deliberate
erasing of key text messages between two anti-Trump FBI executives.
So we are suing the Justice Department for text messages of former FBI
officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page that are believed to be in the
possession of the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and for other
special counsel communications with the FBI relating to Strzok and Page (Judicial
Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:19-cv-02693)).
The text messages in question would have been sent and received on Justice
Department issued iPhones assigned to Strzok and Page during their
assignments to the Special Counsel’s Office and should have been
recovered, reviewed and preserved by the Special Counsel Office before the
phones were sent back to the Justice Department’s Justice Management
Division for reassignment.
Strzok was
removed from the Special Counsel team and Page stepped down in the
summer of 2017 after their anti-Trump/pro-Clinton texts written during
their tenure at the FBI were uncovered. Once the Office of the Special
Counsel became aware of the incendiary text messages, and at the time
Strzok and Page were notified of their termination from the special counsel
team, the duo’s special-counsel phones normally would have been
confiscated and the content on the phones recovered, reviewed and
preserved. Those are the records we want. Strzok and Page are
no longer with the FBI.
We sued after the Justice Department and FBI failed to respond to December
17, 2018, FOIA requests seeking access to the following:
- All records related to the hardware, software and contents of mobile
phones issued to FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page for their use
while they served on the investigative team of Special Counsel Robert
Mueller.
- All records of communication (whether on government or non-.gov email
accounts and whether using real names or aliases), with FBI officials
relating to the hardware, software and contents of mobile phones issued to
FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page for their use while they served on
the investigative team of Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
The time frame for the requested records is May 1, 2017, to December 17,
2018.
In December 2018, the DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General
issued a
report regarding the recovery of “thousands of text messages.”
The IG “initiated this investigation upon being notified of a gap in text
message data collection for the period December 15, 2016, through May 17,
2017, from Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) mobile devices assigned to
FBI employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.”
The OIG asked the FBI Inspection Division to locate the FBI issued
Samsung Galaxy S5 devices formerly assigned to the subject employees and to
obtain from the same individuals their assigned FBI issued Samsung Galaxy
S7 devices…. The result of these steps was the recovery of thousands of
text messages within the period of the missing text messages, December 15,
2016 through May 17, 2017, as well as hundreds of other text messages
outside the gap time period that had not been produced by the FBI due to
technical problems with its text message collection tool.
Because of the content of many of the text messages between Strzok and
Page, the IG also asked Mueller’s office for the DOJ-issued iPhones that
had been assigned to Strzok and Page. The phone assigned to Strzok had been
“reset to factory settings” and “reconfigured for the new user to
whom the device was issued.” Page’s iPhone had been reset but had not
been reassigned.
The IG also said that as of the date of its report, the FBI wasn’t
reliably collecting text messages of all its employees.
Strzok and Page were key investigators in the Clinton email and Russia
collusion investigations. Strzok was removed from the Mueller investigative
team in July
2017 and reassigned to a human resources position after it was
discovered that he and Page exchanged pro-Clinton and anti-Trump text
messages.
Strzok worked for FBI Deputy Director Andrew
McCabe and was carrying on an extramarital affair with Page.
Page resigned in
May 2018. Strzok was
dismissed from the FBI in August 2018.
The Justice Department IG was unable to recover any text messages from
Strzok’s and Page’s phones because the compromised Mueller operation
wiped them. However, we are skeptical that these texts are really gone, and
the DOJ’s stonewalling suggests we are right to be suspicious.
100,000 DACA Applicants Have Been Arrested—Murder, Rape,
DUI
President Obama created a program called Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals, better known as DACA, simply by signing an order. Today, the
Supreme Court is considering whether President Trump has the authority to
undo this amnesty by fiat. There are many sound reasons to end this
travesty, not the least of which is the people this program puts on our
streets. Our Corruption Chronicles blog tells the
story.
More than 100,000 illegal immigrants who requested a special Obama-era
amnesty for adults who came to the U.S. as children have criminal
histories, according to an alarming report
released this month by the government. Offenses committed by the illegal
aliens seeking protection, benefits and rights under the policy known as
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) include murder, rape, weapon
and assault charges. DACA has shielded nearly 800,000 illegal aliens under
the age of 31 from deportation and allowed them to obtain work permits and
drivers licenses. Obama launched the outrageous measure through executive
order in 2012 to help children who came to the U.S. “through no fault of
their own.” The Trump administration tried to end DACA in 2017 but open
borders groups sued to keep it going and now the Supreme Court is set to
decide the matter.
Regardless of how the high court may rule, the fact remains that a big
chunk of DACA applicants have arrest records, according to the figures
released by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the Homeland
Security agency that administers the nation’s lawful immigration
system. The stats show that nearly 110,000 DACA requestors out of nearly
889,000 had arrest records, accounting for 12% of applicants. “Offenses
in these arrest records include assault, battery, rape, murder and driving
under the influence,” USCIS writes in a statement
announcing the report.
Here’s another disturbing fact; of approved DACA requestors with an
arrest, a whopping 85% (67,861) were arrested right before the U.S. granted
them amnesty. Nearly 25,000 DACA recipients with arrests had multiple
arrests and 218 had more than 10 arrests. Incredibly, around one-fourth of
the illegal immigrants with more than 10 arrests were approved by the
government as of last month. In all, the government reveals that it has
approved 79,398 DACA requestors with arrest records. Not all the
delinquents are approved, the figures show. More than 100,000 with criminal
arrests were denied or terminated.
Most of the arrested DACA approvals involve driving infractions and
immigration related civil and criminal offenses, but thousands were granted
amnesty after committing serious crimes. Nearly 8,000 illegal immigrants
granted protection under DACA committed theft or larceny, the records show,
and nearly 7,000 drug-related offenses. More than 4,000 were apprehended
for driving under the influence, 3,421 for battery and 3,308 for assault.
Thousands of others rewarded with DACA committed vandalism, burglary,
offenses against children and weapons crimes. Hundreds of others were
approved for DACA despite arrests for sexual abuse and rape, kidnapping or
trafficking, hit and run, embezzlement and a variety of other serious
offenses. Fifteen illegal aliens with murder charges got DACA as well as 15
street gang members and two arrested for child pornography. Most of the
DACA candidates were arrested between the age of 19 and 22 though tens of
thousands were also arrested between 23 and 26, well into adulthood.
Mexicans account for the overwhelming majority of DACA recipients arrested
(91,272) followed by El Salvador (4,998), Honduras (4,597) and Guatemala
(4,304).
“This agency is obligated to continue accepting
DACA requests from illegal aliens as a direct result of
the previous administration’s decision to circumvent the laws
as passed by Congress,” according to USCIS Acting Director Ken
Cuccinelli. “We hope this data provides a better sense of the
reality of those granted the privilege of a temporary deferral of
removal action and work authorization under DACA.” USCIS
figures
released last year show that the biggest concentration of illegal aliens
protected by DACA are in California (197,900) and Texas (113,000), though
states such as Illinois (35,600), New York (32,900), Florida (27,000) and
Arizona (25,500) also have significant numbers.
This illegal amnesty is “criminal” in more ways than one.
Until next week…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 3rd St Sw Ste 800
Washington, DC 20024
|
|
202.646.5172 |
|
|
©2017-2019, All Rights Reserved
Manage
Email Subscriptions |
Unsubscribe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|