From Jerrick Adams <[email protected]>
Subject Federal judge hears challenge to payroll deductions for public-sector union dues
Date November 22, 2019 6:35 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
The plaintiffs argued that dues deductions violate _Janus v. AFSCME_.
------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to _Union Station_, our weekly newsletter that keeps you abreast of the legislation, national trends, and public debate surrounding public-sector union policy.

In observance of the Thanksgiving holiday next week, we will not be publishing an edition of _Union Station_ on Nov. 29. Publication will resume on Dec. 6.



** FEDERAL JUDGE HEARS ARGUMENTS IN CASE INVOLVING PUBLIC-SECTOR UNION DUES DEDUCTIONS
------------------------------------------------------------

On Nov. 19, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ([link removed]) , of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ([link removed]) , heard oral arguments in _Mendez v. California Teachers Association_, a case involving payroll deductions for public-sector union dues.

WHAT IS AT ISSUE?
The plaintiffs allege that their First Amendment rights were violated when their unions continued to deduct dues from their wages over their stated objections. The plaintiffs argue that this practice violates Janus v. AFSCME ([link removed]) , a 2018 case in which the Supreme Court held that public-sector workers cannot be compelled to provide financial support to unions. The plaintiffs argue that unions must obtain informed consent before deducting dues from wages and refund any illegally obtained dues.

WHO ARE THE PARTIES TO THE SUIT?
The lead plaintiff is Bethany Mendez, a special education instructor. Six additional plaintiffs, all public-school teachers, later joined the suit. The plaintiffs are represented by San Francisco attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon and the Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit whose self-described mission is “to advance individual liberty, free enterprise, and limited, accountable government.”

The defendants are the California Teachers Association, the National Education Association, the state of California, and the individual school districts for which each of the plaintiffs works.

* The California Teachers Association (CTA) is an affiliate of the National Education Association. With its approximately 310,000 members ([link removed]) , CTA is among the state's largest public-sector unions.

WHAT ARE THE REACTIONS?

* Karin Sweigart, litigation counsel for the Freedom Foundation, said ([link removed]) , “_Janus _protects the rights of public employees to decline union dues deduction. But it also makes clear that anytime someone signs up for dues deduction, they are waiving their First Amendment rights – and Constitutional rights cannot be waived knowingly.”
* When the lawsuit was filed in March, Claudia Briggs, a representative for the California Teachers Association, said ([link removed]) , “This is just another lawsuit from the Freedom Foundation to continue the attack on public education and public employees.”

WHAT COMES NEXT?
Rogers, who was appointed to the court by President Barack Obama (D), has not indicated when she expects to reach a verdict. The case name and number are Mendez v. California Teachers Association ([link removed]) , 3:19-cv-01290.

------------------------------------------------------------

[link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------


** THE BIG PICTURE
------------------------------------------------------------


** _NUMBER OF RELEVANT BILLS BY STATE_
------------------------------------------------------------

We are currently tracking 106 pieces of legislation dealing with public-sector employee union policy. On the map below, a darker shade of green indicates a greater number of relevant bills. Click here ([link removed]) for a complete list of all the bills we're tracking.

------------------------------------------------------------


** RECENT LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
------------------------------------------------------------

No legislative actions have occurred since our last issue.

------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for reading! Let us know what you think! Reply to this email with any feedback or recommendations.
BALLOTPEDIA DEPENDS ON THE SUPPORT OF OUR READERS.

The Lucy Burns Institute, publisher of Ballotpedia, is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All donations are tax deductible to the extent of the law. Donations to the Lucy Burns Institute or Ballotpedia do not support any candidates or campaigns.


Click here to support our work ([link removed])

------------------------------------------------------------

============================================================
** Follow on Twitter (#)
** Friend on Facebook (#)
** Forward to Friend ([link removed])
_Copyright © 2019, All rights reserved._

OUR MAILING ADDRESS IS:

Ballotpedia
8383 Greenway Blvd
Suite 600
Middleton, WI 53562
** unsubscribe from all emails ( [link removed] )
** update subscription preferences ( [link removed] )
** ( [link removed] )
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Ballotpedia
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • Pardot
    • Litmus