The right to political expression under fire

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: March 31, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------


** The Right to Political Expression Under Fire: Protesters Fined $3000 Under Florida City’s Ban on ‘Indecent’ Political Speech
------------------------------------------------------------

CHARLOTTE COUNTY, Fla. — The Rutherford Institute is challenging a Florida city’s ordinance which resulted in two protesters being fined $3000 for displaying political messages ([link removed]) stating “F—k Biden,” “F—k Trump,” and “F—k Policing 4 Profit” in violation of a city ordinance banning signs, clothing and other graphic displays containing words that the city deems “indecent.”

In appealing the rulings by the Code Enforcement Board for the City of Punta Gorda, Fla., Rutherford Institute attorneys argue that the City’s ban on “indecent speech” is unconstitutionally vague and violates First Amendment safeguards for political speech which may not be censored or punished by the government.

“The right of political free speech is the basis of all liberty. No matter what their political persuasion might be, every American has a First Amendment right to protest government programs or policies with which they might disagree,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “Ultimately, the First Amendment assures every individual the right to speak truth to power using whatever nonviolent means are at their disposal. Moreover, as Lenny Bruce remarked, ‘If you can’t say ‘F—k’ you can’t say, ‘F—k the government.’”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

On June 2, 2021, the City Council of Punta Gorda, Fla., amended its ordinances to prohibit “any sign containing…indecent speech which is legible from any public right-of-way or within any public space, and which can potentially be viewed by children under the age of 17.” The ban extends to words appearing on flags and clothing, as well, and does not actually have to be seen by a child to constitute a violation. The ordinance defines “indecent speech” as “language or graphics that depict or describe sexual or excretory activities or organs in a manner that is offensive as measured by contemporary community standards.” Each violation can carry up to a $5,000 fine. During the first month of the new ordinance being enacted, Andrew Sheets was cited four times by police for violating the ordinance by displaying phrases which said “F—k Policing 4 Profit,” “F—k Trump,” “F—k Biden,” etc. Likewise, Richard Massey was cited for violating the ordinance by displaying a sign which said
“F—k Punta Gorda, trying to illegally kill free speech.”

Rutherford Institute attorneys defended Sheets’ and Massey’s right to political expression ([link removed]) at a hearing before the Code Enforcement Board. Both Sheets and Massey explained that they did not use any of the words in a sexual manner, but rather that the words were used to express their frustration with the government and with its attempt to restrict their right to freedom of speech. Despite disagreement among Board members about how to determine whether the words were “offensive as measured by community standards,” and despite the city’s inability to assemble an exhaustive list of offensive words that would violate the ordinance, the Board found Sheets and Massey to be in violation of the ordinance and punished them with fines for each instance. On appeal, Rutherford Institute attorneys argued that
the ordinance’s ban on indecent speech violates the First Amendment’s prohibition on content- and viewpoint-based regulations of speech by the government and is unconstitutionally vague because it fails to provide fair notice of what words would result in a penalty.

Affiliate attorney Phares Heindl is assisting with the defense of Massey’s and Sheets’ rights to political expression under the First Amendment. The Rutherford Institute’s briefs in Massey v. City of Punta Gorda, Fla. ([link removed]) and Sheets v. City of Punta Gorda, Fla. ([link removed]) are available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, provides legal assistance at no charge to individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated, and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fprotesters-fined-3000-under-florida-citys-ban-on-indecent-political-speech Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fprotesters-fined-3000-under-florida-citys-ban-on-indecent-political-speech)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2022 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])