(Regarding Biden’s Supreme Court nominee)


<[link removed]>

Friend,


We demand answers from Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, Ketanji Brown
Jackson.


In 2001, Jackson co-authored an amicus brief opposing pro-life Americans’
First Amendment right to freely protest outside of abortion clinics.


Her clients included NARAL – one of the most radical pro-abortion lobbying
groups in the nation.


Jackson’s record proves that she cannot be trusted to serve as an independent
justice who will uphold the Constitution and protect the rights ofall Americans.


That’s why SBA List sent a letter along with 40 other national and state
pro-life leaders to the chairs of the Senate Judiciary Committee urging them to
examine Jackson’s opposition to the First Amendment and her hostility to
pro-life citizens whose views are held by a majority of Americans.


But now we need YOU to echo our call to demand answers from Jackson on her
deeply troubling pro-abortion, anti-free speech record.


Please add your name to our letter urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to
examine critical points of concern regarding Ketanji Brown Jackson’s
pro-abortion, anti-free speech record.
<[link removed]>


ADD YOUR NAME ✏️
<[link removed]>


Below is the text of our letter:


As the Senate engages in its important role in the Supreme Court nomination
process, we write as a coalition of national and state pro-life leaders to
raise grave concerns regarding Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination.


President Joe Biden has committed to only appoint justices who support the Roe
v. Wade jurisprudence.1 Scholars from across the spectrum of legal thought have
criticizedRoe as “bad constitutional law”2 and “among the most damaging of
judicial decisions.”3 Roe not only denigrates our legal system, but also
authorizes our nation’s radical policy of abortion on demand until birth.


One of the destructive outcomes of the Roe decision was removing policymaking
decisions from elected representatives. Judicial activism promotes and extends
this blatant overstepping of separation of powers. Especially now, as the
Supreme Court considers a case that questionsRoe’s core holding, confirming a
justice to the Supreme Court with a commitment to judicial activism would be a
step in the wrong direction.


Jackson’s past writings strongly indicate that she may be unable to fairly
consider arguments from those politically divergent from her own. In an amicus
brief co-authored by Jackson on behalf of the Massachusetts National Abortion
Rights Action League (Mass. NARAL) and other abortion groups regarding buffer
zones around abortion clinics in Massachusetts, she portrayed pro-life sidewalk
counselors as a “hostile, noisy crowd of ‘in-your-face’ protesters.”4 However,
offering life-affirming support or prayer outside of a clinic is not
“harassment”5 and to insist that offering an alternative to abortion is
“indisputably harmful to a medical patient's physical well-being”6 is the
height of absurdity.


Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record speaks loudly of the type of justice she would
be on the Supreme Court. She has been handpicked by a pro-abortion president to
satisfy the pressure campaign from pro-abortion, progressive activists. These
activists refuse to acknowledge the toll thatRoe v. Wade has inflicted on our
country. More than 62 million lives have been lost to abortion since the 1973Roe
decision. As science has advanced, our policymakers have been held back from
enacting laws to protect the unborn.


As the Judiciary Committee considers Jackson’s nomination, we ask that you
thoroughly examine her concerning pattern of judicial activism, hostility to
the pro-life community, and connections to the deep-pocketed pro-abortion
industry.


ADD YOUR NAME ✏️
<[link removed]>


In McGuire v. Reilly, Jackson co-authored an amicus brief supporting a
Massachusetts law that created a floating “buffer zone” to prevent pro-life
sidewalk counselors from approaching to speak with women outside of abortion
facilities.


Jackson didn’t just refuse to recognize the constitutional right to life for
babies in the womb…


…She even wanted to stop citizens from fighting for those babies’ right to
live.


At a time when pro-life voices are being ruthlessly censored online, we simply
cannot have an anti-First Amendment judge like Jackson with a clear hostility
toward pro-life Americans serving on the Supreme Court.


And with the Senate locked in a 50-50 majority, there is no reason we need to
accept Jackson’s confirmation as an inevitability.


But we must do our due diligence to expose Jackson’s extremist record and
ensure Senatorspublicly demand answers from her.


So please, add your name to our letter urging the Senate Judiciary Committee
to examine critical points of concern regarding Ketanji Brown Jackson’s
pro-abortion, anti-free speech record.
<[link removed]>


For LIFE,



<[link removed]>


Marjorie Dannenfelser
President, Susan B. Anthony List


 
Click here
<[link removed]>
if you would like to unsubscribe from these messages.2800 Shirlington Road
Suite 1200, Arlington, VA 22206

Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List) is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) membership
organization. With your gift of $25 or more you will become a Sustaining Member
of SBA List, and will receive information regarding the special benefits of
your annual membership. Your contribution, which is not required to be publicly
disclosed and is not deductible as a charitable contribution for federal income
tax purposes, will be used for pro-life advocacy and social welfare activities
in accordance with the mission and purposes of SBA List, at the discretion of
its board of directors and officers. If you would like to make a directed
contribution to support a particular project, please contact us. Although SBA
List periodically uses its general treasury funds to engage on important
political matters, the organization does not accept funds earmarked for
independent expenditure activity or designated for other political purposes in
support or opposition to federal candidates.