Putin’s Assault on Ukraine and Threat of a Wider War President Vladimir Putin has chosen the path of destruction instead of diplomacy. The Kremlin’s war on Ukrainian cities, towns, nuclear power stations, hospitals, and civilians is indefensible, illegal, premeditated, and heartbreaking. Making matters worse, Putin’s nuclear saber-rattling is raising the risk of escalation in ways we have not seen since the end of the Cold War.
If NATO and Russian military forces become entangled in the fight, the war could widen further and could potentially move to the nuclear level–with catastrophic consequences.
|
|
|
Since Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine, our team has: - Joined with many other civil society leaders around the world (and in Russia) to call for an immediate and unconditional cease-fire and immediate withdrawal of Russian forces.
-
Served as a go-to source explaining the dangerous thinking behind Putin’s nuclear threats, Russia’s official policy on potential nuclear first use, and why raising the readiness level of strategic nuclear forces is dangerous and destabilizing.
- Debunked Kremlin disinformation about U.S. cooperative threat reduction programs in Ukraine.
-
Provided analysis and information on Russia’s use of prohibited cluster munitions and the risk of a false-flag operation involving chemical weapons.
- Maintained contact with nongovernmental colleagues in Europe and inside Russia to continue to develop sound proposals to prevent nuclear catastrophe and prevent a post-war arms race.
How long Russia’s war on Ukraine will last and how it will end is not clear. What is clear is that we face a prolonged period of tensions with the Putin regime.
Unless we can persuade key leaders to make the right choices, we face the prospect of nuclear arms racing without arms control guardrails and the heightened risk of nuclear weapons use.
In an interview on March 1 with MSNBC news anchor Katy Tur, I noted that "until we get rid of these weapons we are going to be living with these risks."
She then asked: “Isn’t this going to eventually lead to a new conversation about whether or not Russia needs 4,000 nuclear weapons, whether or not the United States needs 3,000 or so nuclear weapons?”
My response: "It should" and, it must. And how that debate turns out will depend on how we all respond in this dangerous moment in history. In the days, weeks, months, and years ahead, we need to make sure we don’t lose sight of the fact that it is war and the threat of nuclear war that are our common enemies.
Please consider helping the Arms Control Association continue to be a leading voice in the conversation, so we can get back on the right path. |
|
|
| Daryl G. Kimball,
Executive Director |
|
|
For a sobering analysis of what would happen if, in a conflict between NATO and Russian forces, nuclear weapons were to be used by one side or the other, see
"Plan A: How a Nuclear War Could Progress," originally published in the July 2020 Issue of Arms Control Today.
In an article published March 11 in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, "How to avoid nuclear catastrophe—and a costly new arms race," Daryl Kimball breaks down what is at stake, what could go wrong, and what can be done to move us away from the nuclear brink. |
|
|
Ideas. Information. Influence. Become a monthly sustainer.
If you value our information, news, and analytical resources, please consider making a donation or becoming a member of ACA.
Select your monthly contribution today! |
|
|
Deal to Restore JCPOA Is Close; Debate in Congress Looms
After nearly a year of on-and-off indirect multilateral negotiations to restore U.S. and Iranian compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the parties are nearing a win-win solution.
According to senior U.S. officials, there are a few issues that must still be sorted out, but a deal is “doable” in the coming days.
Unfortunately, some in Congress are threatening to try to block the agreement. If these opponents succeed, it is possible, and maybe even probable, that Iran would become a threshold nuclear-weapon state. We can expect an intense debate in the coming weeks over a vote on a potential joint resolution of disapproval, which would require 60 votes in the Senate to override a veto.
For more on what’s at stake, see our Issue Brief "The Logic of Restoring Compliance with the 2015 Iran Nuclear Deal."
To sign up for updates and our Action Alert Network, sign in here: https://www.armscontrol.org/get-the-latest |
|
|
ACA’s 50th Anniversary Annual Meeting Set for June 2!
Please join us at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. on June 2 for our 2022 Annual Meeting, which arrives 50 years after ACA became an independent, non-profit organization. We’ll review our five decades of accomplishments, examine today’s pressing arms control challenges, hear from ACA friends and alumni, and discuss what we need to do to enable ACA to take on the challenges of tomorrow. Following our meeting we will gather for an informal garden reception.
For more information and to register, see: www.armscontrol.org/armscontrol2022. We hope you will join us and also consider becoming a 50th anniversary sponsor. |
|
|
Staff Goodbyes and Hellos
Earlier this month, our reliable and hard-working Arms Control Association research associate Julia Masterson left ACA to join the U.S. State Department to work in the office of Arms Control, Verification, and Compliance.
She joins other former ACA staff who have continued their arms control careers at State, including our former research analyst Peter Crail, former research Director Wade Boese, and our former Scoville Peace Fellow Maggie Tennis, among others. Such departures are always bittersweet, but we are proud to see her move into a position where she can continue to make a difference.
We welcome a new research associate beginning April 4: Gabriela I. Rosa-Hernández. She holds a Master’s degree in Central European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies from the University of Glasgow, and has previously worked with the Foreign Policy Research Institute, the International Crisis Group, the U.S. Department of Defense, the Baltic Defense College, and the University of Maryland as a research assistant and intern. |
|
|
ACA in the News
Our communications and policy team has been very busy in recent weeks. Here is a partial list of our work with journalists to help inform the debate. -
The Agence France Presse report from March 17, “Iran nuclear deal talks on the home straight?,” quotes Daryl Kimball saying: “it’s clear that a restoration of the agreement is essential to avert another major global crisis.”
-
“Dear Ohio: Should We Start Worrying About the Bomb?” In this March 16 podcast interview, Curtis Jackson of SpectrumNews spoke with Daryl Kimball, about the risks of nuclear escalation, arms control agreements.
-
"Cluster Bomb Use is Needless Cruelty” in CounterPunch, March 11 quotes ACA fellow Jeff Abramson.
-
ACA senior policy analyst Shannon Bugos spoke with TV3 (Spain) on March 5 on the risk of nuclear escalation. See: "Els EUA i Rússia arriben a la crisi d'Ucraïna gairebé sense mecanismes de control nuclear."
-
Kimball spoke with Sirius XM Radio’s “POTUS” show on the "Nuclear Danger of Russia's Invasion” on March 4, 2022.
-
On March 4, Daryl Kimball spoke with CNN’s Erin Burnett on the dangers to nuclear power plants and spent fuel storage facilities as Russian forces attacked the Zaporizhzhia complex in Ukraine.
-
A March 2 news analysis by Spencer Bokat-Lindell in The New York Times "Putin Is Brandishing the Nuclear Option. How Serious Is the Threat?” cites ACA’s analysis.
-
Daryl Kimball spoke with MSNBC’s Katie Tur on March 1 for their segment, "Putin Places Nuclear Forces on High Alert."
-
A February 28 Washington Post explainer "What to know about Putin’s nuclear order” includes analysis from the Arms Control Association and Daryl Kimball.
-
An MSNBC report from February 27, "In 'unprecedented' action, Putin orders nuclear deterrent forces to be on 'high alert' amid spiraling tensions over Ukraine,” cites Daryl Kimball.
-
A Washington Post report from Feb. 27 "With Russian nuclear forces on alert, Ukraine crisis enters more dangerous phase” cites Daryl Kimball.
-
Daryl Kimball appeared on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal program to discuss "Russian Nuclear Capability” on Sunday February 26.
-
A widely published Feb. 26 Associated Press explainer by Robert Burns "Does Putin’s alert change risk of nuclear war?” quotes Daryl Kimball saying: “Inserting nuclear weapons into the Ukraine war equation at this point is extremely dangerous, and the United States, President Biden, and NATO must act with extreme restraint” and not respond in kind.“This is a very dangerous moment in this crisis, and we need to urge our leaders to walk back from the nuclear brink.”
- A Feb. 25 Foreign Policy magazine news report, "Biden Halts Russian Arms Control Talks Amid Ukraine Invasion,” cites an Arms Control Today editorial.
-
ACA Senior Fellow Michael Klare wrote an article for the February issue of The Nation magazine,"A New “March of Folly” in Europe: Can It Be Averted?” that foreshadowed the dangers of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
-
In a Feb. 5 story in The New York Times,“Ukraine Gave Up a Giant Nuclear Arsenal 30 Years Ago. Today There Are Regrets," by William J. Broad, Daryl Kimball noted that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, “... will reinforce the impression that nuclear-armed states can bully non-nuclear states and thus reduce the incentives for disarmament.”
|
|
|
Copyright © 2022 Arms Control Association, All rights reserved. Arms Control Association
1200 18th Street NW, #1175
Washington, DC 20036
United States |
|
|
|
