View this email in your browser ([link removed])
An update from FactCheck.org
People evacuate an area near Irpin, Ukraine, on March 10. Photo by Chris McGrath via Getty Images.


** Misinformation About Russia's War
------------------------------------------------------------

Russia’s war in Ukraine has dominated public discourse since troops amassed at the border before invading on Feb. 24. We’ve done nine stories so far about false and misleading claims related to the war.

When an issue commands this much attention, we keep a running list of our stories on the topic. You can read our articles to date about the war in "FactChecking Claims About the Conflict in Ukraine ([link removed]) ." We’ll keep updating it as we write more articles.

Most recently, we addressed ([link removed]) a viral claim on social media that falsely identified two of the victims of Russia’s bombing of a maternity hospital in the Ukrainian port city of Mariupol as the same “crisis actor.”

One of the women, who was not identified, later died along with her baby. The other was Marianna Podgurskaya, a social media influencer who survived and gave birth to a daughter on March 10.

Photos of Podgurskaya and the woman who died were misrepresented in social media posts to falsely claim Podgurskaya was a paid crisis actor who posed as two different pregnant women.

The claim spread widely on many platforms and was also posted by the Russian embassy in the U.K., before Twitter removed the post.

We often see bogus claims about “crisis actors” following tragedies. It happened after the killing ([link removed]) of George Floyd in 2020, and the mass shooting ([link removed]) at a Parkland, Florida, high school in 2018.

Some other recent claims we’ve addressed include the falsehood ([link removed]) that American megachurches aren’t supporting Ukrainians, and the mislabeling ([link removed]) of an old video to make the false claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin had recently met with the South Korean president.
HOW WE KNOW
After Congress passed a $1.5 trillion spending bill, some on social media falsely implied that it provided members of Congress with "a 21% pay raise." FactCheck.org reporter Brea Jones went through the bill ([link removed]) , summaries ([link removed]) of the bill ([link removed]) and a Congressional Research Service report ([link removed]) to get the facts. She learned there was a 21% increase in the House members office accounts, but it doesn't raise the salaries of lawmakers. In fact, members of Congress haven't had a pay raise since 2010. Read more ([link removed]) .
FEATURED FACT
The seven-day average for new COVID-19 cases peaked on Jan. 15 at 809,621, according to ([link removed]) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As of March 15, the seven-day average had reached the lowest point since July — 30,934 cases. But Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told an ABC News affiliate ([link removed]) in San Diego that he expects the latest omicron variant will cause an uptick in cases in the coming weeks.
WORTHY OF NOTE
Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center and co-founder of FactCheck.org, and Angie Holan, editor-in-chief of PolitiFact, were panelists in an hourlong discussion on March 16 about fact-checking the 2022 U.S. elections.

The virtual event -- "Election 2022: Fact-Checking and Countering Misinformation ([link removed]) " -- was hosted by the State Department's Washington Foreign Press Center ([link removed]) for the benefit of foreign journalists. The center provides such events for foreign journalists covering the United States.

Jamieson, who started FactCheck.org in 2003, noted how fact-checking has changed over the years and the challenge that it poses for fact-checkers.

"There’s been a concerted attack on the fact-checking enterprise itself – that is, there have been attempts to call its legitimacy into question," she said. "And so fact-checking has changed across time in that it is no longer accepted by all in the way it once was as a journalistic enterprise that was working from common norms and as a result is trustworthy. Its trustworthiness has been challenged, and that makes it more difficult to do what it is we’re doing."

She added that it is "more important than ever" to feature "our journalistic norms" of disclosing the sources cited in our articles, providing links to our sources and correcting the record when we get something wrong.
REPLY ALL

Reader: I came across this today on Facebook Group “Tin Can Sailors USA”:

“[R]emember the Cuban missile crisis. The state dept just admitted we have Bio Weapons Labs in Ukraine. After this Covid pandemic just imagine what we would be doing if Russia had bio weapons labs in Mexico or Cuba. May be these labs are the ones that Saddam had.”

Is there any truth here?

FactCheck.org Science Editor Jessica McDonald: This isn’t true. Neither the U.S. nor Ukraine has admitted there are U.S.-funded biolabs or bioweapons labs in Ukraine. In fact, officials from both countries have said the opposite, and there’s no evidence that any such labs exist.

As FactCheck.org freelancer Joseph A. Gambardello has explained ([link removed]) , many of these bogus claims are distortions of the U.S. Department of Defense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program ([link removed]) , which has worked to improve Ukrainian public health labs and ensure any pathogens remain secure.

Since we published Gambardello’s story on March 2, false claims about Ukrainian bioweapons labs have only spread further, as Russia accused ([link removed]) the U.S. of supporting a biological weapons program in Ukraine during a March 11 U.N. Security Council meeting. The U.N. has said it’s not aware ([link removed]) of any such program.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson, among other conservative news outlets, have helped ([link removed]) to propagate these claims, including by spinning testimony from Victoria Nuland ([link removed]) , the undersecretary of state for political affairs. In a March 8 Senate hearing, Nuland said that Ukraine has “biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of,” adding that the U.S. was working with Ukraine “on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.”

But as our colleagues at the Washington Post have written ([link removed]) , this doesn’t mean Ukraine has a bioweapons program. Many biology labs conducting standard research might have potentially dangerous pathogens, which could become a concern if Russian soldiers take over.

Many labs don’t even have that. One Ukrainian lab that Russia has falsely accused of being part of a covert bioweapons program studies parasites in bats. The researchers collaborated with German scientists, but did not receive U.S. funding -- and there are no infectious pathogens to worry about, as the collected samples were preserved in ethanol, Science reported ([link removed]) .

These claims are just the latest in a decades-long effort ([link removed]) from Russia to spread falsehoods about the U.S. and biological weapons.

“On a daily basis, Russia propagates disinformation aimed at [Biological Threat Reduction Program’s] laboratory and capacity building efforts in former Soviet Union countries—falsely claiming that the U.S. Department of Defense support is used to develop biological weapons,” a March 11 fact sheet ([link removed]'S-COOPERATIVE-THREAT-REDUCTION-PROGRAM-BIOLOGICAL-THREAT-REDUCTION-PROGRAM-ACTIVITIES-IN-UKRAINE.PDF?utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=aaeeccc625-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_03_15_10_51&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-aaeeccc625-48392213) from the Department of Defense states. “Unlike Russia, the United States and Ukraine are not developing biological weapons and are in full compliance with the Biological Weapons Convention.”


** Wrapping Up
------------------------------------------------------------

Here's what else we've got for you this week:
* "Evidence Still Lacking to Support Ivermectin as Treatment for COVID-19 ([link removed]) ":
Randomized controlled trials haven’t found ivermectin is beneficial in treating COVID-19, although results for ongoing studies will provide a more definitive answer. Yet, a video presents two weak studies as “powerful” and “overwhelming” evidence that the medication works to combat COVID-19.
* "Both Sides Spin Domestic Oil Production ([link removed]) ": With the U.S. blocking new purchases of Russian oil, the White House, Republicans and the oil industry are engaged in a disagreement over whether the administration has hampered domestic oil production on federal land or whether the industry is holding back. Both sides are spinning the facts.
* "Ads Attacking Dr. Oz ([link removed]) ": A super PAC that supports Republican Pennsylvania Senate candidate Dave McCormick has been flooding the airwaves in the Keystone State with ads attacking his opponent, cardiac surgeon and TV personality Dr. Mehmet Oz, as a "Hollywood liberal" and RINO, or Republican in Name Only. We'll provide some context about the claims.
* "Ads Attacking Dave McCormick ([link removed]) ": The campaign of Dr. Mehmet Oz and a super PAC supporting him are running ads that seek to paint his chief rival in the Pennsylvania Senate Republican primary, Dave McCormick, as a "friend" of China who outsourced Pittsburgh jobs and is out of step with former President Donald Trump. But the ads distort some facts to make that case.
* "TV Ad Features Cherry-Picked Comments from Rep. Ted Budd About Putin ([link removed]) ": In late February, Republican Rep. Ted Budd described Russian President Vladimir Putin as “erratic,” a “thug” and “intelligent.” He also said Putin has “strategic reasons” for wanting to “protect” his country’s borders, but called Russia’s invasion of Ukraine “evil” and pledged support for Ukrainians. But a new TV ad from Republican Pat McCrory cherry-picks from Budd’s remarks to claim the congressman “excuses Putin” for Russia’s deadly attack on Ukraine.
* "Fauci Continues Making Public Appearances and Hasn’t ‘Disappeared’ ([link removed]) ": Dr. Anthony Fauci has continued making public appearances, although news coverage has largely shifted away from the pandemic since Russia invaded Ukraine in February and COVID-19 cases have dramatically fallen. Some politicians and pundits, however, have suggested that Fauci has become so unpopular that he has “disappeared” from public view. He hasn’t. Fauci has made at least a dozen public appearances since Feb. 15.
* "Social Media Posts Misrepresent Victims of Hospital Bombed in Mariupol ([link removed]) ": Russian planes bombed a hospital in Mariupol, Ukraine, on March 9, killing three people and injuring at least 17, including two pregnant women seen in photos shared around the world. Social media posts falsely claimed one woman “posed” as the two women. One of the women died of her injuries, along with her baby; the other gave birth to a daughter.

Y lo que publicamos en español ([link removed]) (English versions are accessible in each story):
* "Publicación malinterpreta campañas de salud pública para concientizar sobre coágulos sanguíneos ([link removed]) ": En febrero, los Centros para la Prevención y el Control de Enfermedades (CDC, por sus siglas en inglés) y Pfizer tuitearon sobre los peligros de los coágulos sanguíneos en venas, los cuales son relativamente comunes y afectan a hasta 900.000 estadounidenses cada año. Sin embargo, una historia publicada en las redes sociales vinculó erróneamente esos mensajes de salud pública con las vacunas contra el COVID-19.
* "Aún no hay pruebas que apoyen el tratamiento contra el COVID-19 con ivermectina ([link removed]) ": Los ensayos controlados aleatorizados no han encontrado beneficios en el uso de la ivermectina como tratamiento contra el COVID-19, aunque los resultados de investigaciones en curso brindarán una respuesta más definitiva. Sin embargo, un video presenta dos estudios de pobre calidad como pruebas “poderosas” y “abrumadoras” de que el medicamento funciona para combatir el COVID-19.

Have a question about COVID-19 and the vaccines? Visit our SciCheck page ([link removed]) for answers. It's available in Spanish ([link removed]) , too.
Donate to Support Our Work ([link removed])

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2022 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=aaeeccc625-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_03_15_10_51&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-aaeeccc625-48392213)
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=aaeeccc625-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_03_15_10_51&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-aaeeccc625-48392213)
.

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania . 202 S 36th St. . Philadelphia, Pa 19104 . USA