From Mercatus Center <[email protected]>
Subject How has COVID changed healthcare?
Date March 13, 2022 3:33 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
To view this email as a web page, go to the link below, or copy and paste it into your browser's address window.
[link removed]



[link removed]






[link removed]


[link removed]
Virtual Health in a Post&ndash;COVID World: Optimizing Regulation, Reimbursement, and Regularity
[link removed]
Robert Graboyes ,
[link removed]
Darcy N. Bryan, MD and

Lyle Berkowitz
March 8, 2022

&#8202;

The COVID-19 pandemic and its attendant social distancing spurred a sharp increase in the use of “virtual health” across the United States. This has made it possible for Americans to access healthcare at any time and from almost anywhere in the country. In “Virtual Health in a Post–COVID World,” Robert Graboyes, Darcy N. Bryan, and Lyle Berkowitz examine how such levels of availability can be made permanent.

[link removed]
Continue Reading




[link removed]


[link removed]
Worth the Pain: The Costs and Benefits of a Strict Implementation of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act
[link removed]
Christine McDaniel and
[link removed]
Weifeng Zhong
March 10, 2022

&#8202;

The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act directs Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other federal agencies to prevent the importation of products made with forced labor in China. The implementation of this law is not straightforward because goods are produced in complex supply chains that extend across multiple countries. The complexity of supply chains increases the difficulty in determining the origin of all parts of an imported product and excluding products with parts of relatively small value (e.g., the cotton threads used in sewing polyester or the leather upholstery used in automobiles) if they are made with forced labor. CBP will have to weigh the economic costs of demanding strict compliance against the moral costs of implementing the law leniently.

[link removed]
Continue Reading




[link removed]


[link removed]
One Giant Leap for Evidence-Based Policy in Kansas
[link removed]
James Broughel
March 9, 2022

&#8202;

The purpose of periodic review is simple: determine whether regulations are achieving their objectives. Periodic review also creates a process during which rules can be fine-tuned as circumstances change. A periodic review process can take several forms, but perhaps the most common is to establish a set timeframe according to which regulations under an agency’s authority must be reviewed. That is the process envisioned by Sub SB34.

[link removed]
Continue Reading




[link removed]


[link removed]
Maryland Should Consider Creating a Regulatory Sandbox
[link removed]
Brian Knight
March 9, 2022

&#8202;

Regulatory sandboxes were developed to achieve several important goals, including encouraging innovation, competition, and entry in highly regulated industries; providing regulators with greater insight and transparency into cutting-edge products and services; and furthering consumer protection by both helping innovators design their products to be compliant with the law and encouraging the introduction of products and services that will better serve consumer needs.

[link removed]
Continue Reading




[link removed]


[link removed]
Allowing Accessory Dwelling Units Would Contribute to Housing Affordability in Maryland
[link removed]
Emily Hamilton
March 8, 2022

&#8202;

Land use regulations limit property owners’ right to build housing. When increasing demand for housing meets a market where zoning rules constrain housing supply—as in high-cost regions in Maryland— the result is that a limited supply of homes becomes more expensive, and low-income families are forced to look elsewhere. This outcome harms the state’s most vulnerable residents and undermines the state’s continuing role as a center of economic opportunity.

[link removed]
Continue Reading




[link removed]


[link removed]
Considerations for the ATS Proposal
[link removed]
Andrew N. Vollmer
March 11, 2022

&#8202;

The Proposal would add many regulatory obligations to the operation of the trading markets for fixed-income securities, particularly the markets for US government securities. The SEC should reconsider each of the specific proposals and adopt only those that are within its statutory authority, that address serious social harms that can be meaningfully reduced by further regulation, and that will produce benefits that exceed costs.

[link removed]
Continue Reading







Support the Work We DoDonate to the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

[link removed]
Donate Now


[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]





----------------------------------------

This email was sent by:
Mercatus Center
3434 Washington Blvd 4th Floor
Arlington, VA, 22201, US

We respect your right to privacy - visit the following URL to view our policy.
( [link removed] )

----------------------------------------

Visit the following URL to manage your subscriptions.
( [link removed] )

Visit the following URL to update your profile.
( [link removed] )

Visit the following URL to unsubscribe.
( [link removed] )
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis

  • Sender: Mercatus Center
  • Political Party: n/a
  • Country: United States
  • State/Locality: n/a
  • Office: n/a
  • Email Providers:
    • Salesforce Email Studio (ExactTarget)