Presidents have usurped Congress's powers

[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fpodcast-who-makes-us-immigration-policy Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fcis%2Fpodcast-who-makes-us-immigration-policy)
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
Who Makes U.S. Immigration Policy? ([link removed])
Presidents have usurped Congress's powers
Follow Parsing Immigration Policy on Ricochet ([link removed]) , Apple Podcasts ([link removed]) , Amazon Music ([link removed]) , Spotify ([link removed]) , Stitcher ([link removed]) , Google Podcasts ([link removed]) or use the podcast's RSS Feed ([link removed])

Washington, D.C. (March 3, 2022) – Congressionally established immigration policy has certain narrow carve outs providing discretion to presidents. One of these carve-outs, "immigration parole", has been abused by presidents of both parties to admit hundreds of thousands of ineligible people from abroad, ignoring the intent of Congress and undermining the Constitution’s separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches.

The Biden administration seems to want to parole in millions. Can presidents simply ignore laws passed by Congress and let into the United States anyone they want?

In this week’s episode of Parsing Immigration Policy ([link removed]) , George Fishman, the Center’s senior legal fellow with more than 25 years' experience in government, provides recommendations for how the courts or Congress can address the executive branch’s abuse of parole.

Jessica M. Vaughan, the Center’s director of policy studies, discusses the impact of allowing the mass entry of broad categories of beneficiaries. Categorical parole has allowed the Biden administration to essentially grant what Vaughan calls “green card lite” to illegal border crossers. These aliens can obtain a work permit, a Social Security number, and in some states, a driver’s license, which incentivizes illegal immigration.

In his closing commentary, Mark Krikorian, the Center’s executive director and host of Parsing Immigration Policy ([link removed]) , discusses the immigration implications of the Russian invasion of the Ukraine, and responds to the accusations by the New York Times that Hungary and Poland are xenophobic for opening their borders to refugees from next-door Ukraine, after not welcoming refugees from Syria, Afghanistan, and other distant lands.
Visit Website ([link removed])
Donate ([link removed])
Related links:

The Pernicious Perversion of Parole ([link removed])

Don’t Mess with Texas ([link removed])

============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** Google Plus ([link removed])
** LinkedIn ([link removed])
** RSS ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 Center for Immigration Studies, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
Center for Immigration Studies
1629 K St., NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
USA

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

** View this e-mail in your browser. ([link removed])

This is the Center for Immigration Studies CISNews e-mail list.