No images? Click here Welcome to The Corner. In this issue, we discuss the implications of a Belgian regulator’s ruling on ad consent pop-ups, our recent three-day conference dismantling myths about anti-monopoly reform, and the risks of rising concentration in the banking sector. How a Small Regulator in Europe Could Upend the U.S. Digital Ad Market Karina Montoya A recent ruling by the Belgian Data Protection Authority (DPA) may end up having powerful effects in the United States as talks to ban surveillance advertising and protect consumers’ privacy intensify. The decision centered on those "Accept All Cookies" pop-up windows that now commonly greet visitors to websites. The ad-tech industry has tried to use these pop-ups as a means of complying with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which went into effect in 2016. The Belgian DPA found that the pop-ups violated the GDPR’s requirement that personal data about any person should not be used without first acquiring the individual’s consent in a clear and transparent way. Moreover, the Belgian DPA found that ad-tech platforms, publishers, and advertisers violated the GDPR by failing to keep private the personal data they collect from cookies and use for targeting digital ads. As a corrective measure, the DPA ordered all such data be deleted immediately. It also gave a marching order to the European arm of the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB Europe), which is the largest trade association of digital advertisers that designed the protocols for these pop-ups under a so-called Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF). The DPA gave IAB Europe six months to come with a new framework under which the use of targeted ads would not violate the GDPR’s privacy safeguards. That won’t be easy. One of the key points of the ruling is that the TCF makes users individually identifiable through a combination of data strings and cookies. Although the TCF does not carry personal data, after users select their data-sharing preferences in the pop-ups, the retrieval of cookies installed in a user’s browser allows ad-tech platforms to snatch personal data. This can range from IP addresses and religious beliefs to GPS coordinates and even health conditions. The ruling threatens the foundations of surveillance advertising. This system relies on ad sellers and buyers exchanging terabytes of personal data about each of us on ad exchanges — the largest one being controlled by Google. This data packaging is not secure and leaks out in ways that clearly violate the privacy protections of the GDPR. When users click on “Accept all Cookies,” they have no way of knowing that their data will be processed by thousands of companies downstream. Johnny Ryan, a senior fellow at both the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) and at the Open Markets Institute, says the Belgian DPA ruling has implications far beyond Europe. In the U.S., IAB has developed the same pop-up system in response to the California Consumer Privacy Act. “U.S. lawmakers looked at the GDPR as a failure because of these nuisance pop-ups,” says Ryan, who was a claimant in the case brought before the Belgian DPA. “But the pop-ups were merely the tracking industry’s cynical attempt to undermine the GDPR. It looked like a failure but was not. In fact, the GDPR is what has now protected people from this new consent spam. Lawmakers should consider how a similar law could now protect the U.S. citizens against the consent spam that is starting to spread in their country.” IAB Europe has announced it will appeal the Belgian DPA’s decision. It also put out a statement denying that the TCF is illegal and advising that data collected through this system doesn’t have to be deleted. In response to this, the ICCL and the Electronic Privacy Information Center have sent a joint letter to several global advertisers calling on them to delete the data collected through the TCF in Europe. Antitrust Champions Endorse Stricter Enforcement to Dismantle Monopoly Power
More than a dozen competition policy experts, including Senator Amy Klobuchar, Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Jonathan Kanter, and Special Assistant to the President Tim Wu, took part last week in the Open Markets Institute’s conference “Busting the Big Myths on Anti-Monopoly Reform.” The panelists outlined the steps deemed necessary to ensure greater competition in the U.S. marketplace and reassert remedies to limit monopolies. The three hourlong midday conversations focused on three aspects of anti-monopoly reform:
The conference was covered by Bloomberg, Politico, and Common Dreams, among other outlets. Open Markets Submits Comment to the DOJ to Invigorate Bank Merger Enforcement
Open Markets last week submitted a comment to the Justice Department (DOJ), urging the agency to block more bank mergers in response to its request for comments on bank merger policies in December 2021. In our comment, Open Markets details how rising concentration of the American banking sector has led to increases in consumer prices and decreases in worker wages and leaves communities without access to essential banking services. We urged the department to enact bright-line rules governing bank mergers. Read the full comment here. 🔊 ANTI-MONOPOLY RISING:
📝 WHAT WE'VE BEEN UP TO:
We appreciate your readership. Please consider making a contribution to support the continued publication of this newsletter. 📈 VITAL STAT:27%The cut Apple proposes to take on every dollar of purchases people make on Dutch dating apps, after the Authority for Consumers and Markets, the Dutch regulator, prohibited Apple from requiring dating apps to use only its payment system. (The New York Times) 📚 WHAT WE'RE READING:
NIKKI USHER'S NEW BOOK
News for the Rich, White, and Blue: How Place and Power Distort American Journalism Nikki Usher, a senior fellow at Open Markets Institute’s Center for Journalism & Liberty, has released her third book, News for the Rich, White, and Blue: How Place and Power Distort American Journalism. In her latest work, Usher offers a frank examination of the inequalities driving not just America’s journalism crisis but also certain portions of the movement to save it. “We need to radically rethink the core functions of journalism, leverage expertise, and consider how to take the best of what the newspaper ethos of journalism can offer to places that have lost geographically specific news, “ says Usher, an associate professor at the University of Illinois-Champaign. “The news that powers democracy can be more inclusive.” Usher is also the author of Making News at The New York Times (2014) and Interactive Journalism: Hackers, Data, and Code (2016). News for the Rich, White, and Blue, published by Columbia University Press, is available as a hardback, paperback and e-book. You can order your copy here. 🔎 TIPS? COMMENTS? SUGGESTIONS? We would love to hear from you—just reply to this e-mail and drop us a line. Give us your feedback, alert us to competition policy news, or let us know your favorite story from this issue. |