[The Tech Bro has become Hollywood’s go-to villain. Now, TV is
finally grappling with Silicon Valley’s complex female
entrepreneurs] [[link removed]]

PORTSIDE CULTURE

BOSSING IT: WHY THE WOMEN OF BIG TECH ARE TAKING OVER THE SMALL
SCREEN  
[[link removed]]


 

Laura Martin
February 18, 2022
The Guardian
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

_ The Tech Bro has become Hollywood’s go-to villain. Now, TV is
finally grappling with Silicon Valley’s complex female entrepreneurs
_

Phoning it in … Amanda Seyfried as Elizabeth Holmes in The Dropout.
, Phoning it in … Amanda Seyfried as Elizabeth Holmes in The
Dropout.

 

In the jaw-dropping saga of disgraced health-tech entrepreneur
Elizabeth Holmes
[[link removed]],
there was one aspect that attracted most of the public’s attention:
her voice.

Despite lying about her “revolutionary” pin-prick blood test
technology that failed to work, then duping her patients with false
diagnoses (she was convicted of four counts of defrauding investors
earlier this year) it was her appearance – the Steve Jobs-esque
black turtleneck jumpers and signature red lipstick – and her deep
baritone, masculine-affected voice that people really zoned in on. So
when The Dropout, the TV adaptation of Holmes’s life story – based
on Rebecca Jarvis’s 2019 podcast
[[link removed]] of
the same name – was first announced with Amanda Seyfried in the lead
role, the internet was abuzz. Would Seyfried do “the voice”?

Yes, as it turns out. But while this vocal affectation might have been
a joke to social media, to Melissa, who has worked in the upper
management of a big tech company for the past 20 years, it’s
something that rings true.

“I have absolutely lived that,” Melissa – who, like all the
women in tech interviewed for this article, asked for anonymity –
says. “When I want to be heard at my work, I have to talk slower and
deeper. If you hit too high of a pitch, they [the men] don’t hear
you. If I don’t think my voice will be listened to, I’ll call a
male colleague, one of my allies, prior to the meeting and say:
‘Hey, I’m going to ping you in the background, say this when I
tell you to.’ They’ll be my voice.”

With the news agenda for the past decade being full of the ethically
dubious behaviour
[[link removed]] of
some of the male leaders of the tech world, scant attention has been
paid to the women in the industry, who make up just 19%
[[link removed]] of
the tech workforce in the UK. The same is true reflected in pop
culture. While the Tech Bro villain
[[link removed]] is
now a well-worn trope in everything from the recent Matrix reboot
[[link removed]] to
Succession and the video game send-up Free Guy
[[link removed]],
and we’ve had multiple portrayals of Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Mark
Zuckerberg, there’s been hardly any representation of women in tech
on the small screen. With a smattering of comedy roles of women
working lower down the tech chain (the brilliantly sarky Dobby from
Peep Show or blagger Jen from The IT Crowd) to women actually making
power moves in the industry (riot grrrl programmer Cameron in Halt
and Catch Fire
[[link removed]] or
whistleblower coder Nanette in the Black Mirror episode USS Callister
[[link removed]]),
stories of women in tech have historically been as rare as a female
CEO in Palo Alto.

However, this year, TV’s gaze is finally turning to the female
power-players of Silicon Valley. Alongside The Dropout, dramatisations
of Sheryl Sandberg’s role as COO of Facebook (to be played by Claire
Foy in Doomsday Machine) and Arianna Huffington’s position on the
board at Uber (Uma Thurman, in Showtime’s Super Pumped) will hit the
screen later in 2022.

The onscreen depiction of these highly ambitious – some say ruthless
– women will be drawn from the books that have inspired the series:
Sandberg is “a master manager and delegator … who felt she was put
on this planet to scale organisations” (from Sheera Frenkel and
Cecilia Kang’s An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for
Domination); while Huffington leads with “charm and
persuasiveness” (as per Super Pumped’s author, Mike Isaac
[[link removed]]).
But do these representations reflect what it’s really like for women
working in Big Tech?

Ex-Spotify employee Simone explains: “I think what links these women
– and most women in the industry – is that you’ve got to be
smart, strategic and driven, as it’s a very tough environment.

I’ve experienced women trying to emulate the men of Silicon Valley.
I’ve seen some terrible things, and it can really crush you”

“The big six [Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Alphabet, Amazon and
Microsoft] are where everyone wants to work and the returns are huge
– you get a big salary and with all the equity … I feel like
working in tech is the new banking, especially with all the shares –
if you join a startup at the right time you can make millions.”

Therese, who works for Facebook (now rebranded Meta), agrees: “There
are unbelievable benefits to working at Facebook, the salary for
starters. But really, I’m interested in being part of something
that’s connected to the future, however potentially damaging that
future might be. There’s something very interesting about being part
of that conversation.”

It has taken so long to tell the women’s stories, Simone believes,
for the simple fact that it’s still an anomaly for women to be high
up in big tech companies. Someone such as Holmes is a “unicorn” in
a double meaning: both in the tech sense (her company Theranos became
a startup with a potential valuation of $1bn); and because, as a
female founder, she was as rare as the mythical beast. Her ability to
talk the talk was proved by her – mainly older, male – investors,
who included Rupert Murdoch, Larry Ellison and George Schultz,
elevating her to a role few women have ever experienced in the
industry.

“I’m not exactly sure why there are so few female founders,”
Simone wonders. “But in this culture it’s all about risk. Building
a product is a risk, joining a startup is a risk and maybe as women we
want more safety in our careers?”

Slogans such as “Move fast – break things!” and “Be brave!”
line the walls at Facebook but, in reality, women are rarely permitted
to exhibit those types of behaviour. To be seen as impulsive or
demanding perfection as a man in big tech is to be lauded – creative
genius at work here! – but they’re often seen as negative
qualities in a woman, who would be thought of as unreliable and
branded “bossy”.

In Simone’s experience, even in Spotify – a company founded in
Sweden, where there is a big push for gender equality – women are
still fighting to get a look in higher up the chain: “In most of the
inner circles, it’s still always men who are CEO or CFO, and the
token woman is head of HR or chief of operations. Women aren’t
decision-making on company strategy or direction, they’re in
nurturing, people-facing roles. Even Arianna [Huffington] came into
Uber to clean up culture and operations.”

“Oh fuck, yes, it’s still a total boys’ club,” says Melissa.
“The worst are the men who think they’re enlightened but when it
comes down to it they’re not. It’s not my job to teach you how to
be the good guy. Go and get training! Go and figure out your own
unconscious bias!”

After #MeToo, there seems to have been a concerted effort by tech
companies to put women in higher positions. This can sometimes come
across as “female-washing” of problematic brands, says Francesca
Sobande, a lecturer in digital media studies at Cardiff University.
“That’s not to suggest that I think the appointment of women in
certain roles in big tech is solely based on their gender identity in
any way, but I do think that organisations are hyper-aware of what it
means when a woman becomes a figurehead of a company that is typically
associated with male-dominated spaces.”

We have seen this on TV, she adds, through storylines such as Shiv Roy
in Succession, brought in to chair a Waystar Royco conference to
soothe shareholders’ worries about the company’s sexual misconduct
issues, or when she obsequiously tries to be an ally to Gerri over
those dick pics sent by her brother Roman, in what’s really a bid to
take him down instead.

“[In] a show like Succession there is a risk sometimes that these
sorts of conversations overlook the agency of women,” says Sobande.
“A character like Shiv knows exactly what she’s doing when she’s
making certain decisions that relate to the optics of gender and
power.

“It’s important when thinking about these things to always
acknowledge the agency of women within this, and what it means for a
woman to sometimes knowingly participate in or be complicit in these
types of power dynamics that oppress other women.”

This oppression of other women is seen offscreen, too, Therese says:
“I’ve definitely experienced women trying to emulate the men of
Silicon Valley. I’ve seen some terrible things, and it can really
crush you.”

Therese remembers one senior woman who was manipulative and “should
not have been in power”. “If I’m being kind about it, it was
probably her reaction to the highly competitive system. The pressure
of being constantly reviewed in the six-monthly 360 reviews – where
overtime is encouraged and your bonus is based on it – it starts to
affect how you feel about yourself, as a person, and it affects
everything. It starts to influence your feelings about your
self-identity and self-worth. It’s a massively, massively entrenched
system.”

What is telling in previous TV representations of women in tech, says
Sobande, is what is overlooked, from the fact that these stories are
all solely focused on white women to them not including “a critique
of the power dynamics and the often oppressive capitalist structure
that they’re implicated in”.

For those few “unicorns’’ who make it through to the top in
Silicon Valley, it might feel like a hollow victory, given the
accusations that many of these companies are entrenched in ethically
questionable behaviour – manipulating users’ emotions; allowing
conspiracy theories to spread – in the name of profit. Sobande adds:
“In some pop culture portrayals we see confusion for a
representation of any woman in a position of power with it symbolising
some form of feminism. With these upcoming series, I’m intrigued to
what extent we’re going to see this ‘girlboss’ narrative coming
through, and whether or not there’s going to be [an implication of]
a feminist sentiment to any of what is depicted.”

Simone also wonders if we can ever square the dichotomy of working for
certain corporations that appear to be morally bankrupt yet claim to
empower women: “I’m so interested to see Doomsday Machine because
of the juxtaposition of Facebook’s morals and Sheryl [Sandberg]’s
heavy messaging about women ‘leaning in’ [the concept at the
centre of Sandberg’s bestselling 2013 nonfiction book
[[link removed]]].
I want to get into her psyche about how you balance those two things:
promoting women but in a company that does so much destruction. But
it’s not just her. I think sometimes women are the ones who are
expected to be the ethical ones in the industry.

“I’m fascinated by it.” As are those of us outside big tech,
too.

_Some names have been changed. The Dropout __airs from 3 March on
Disney+ in the UK and Hulu in the US__. __Super Pumped airs in the US
from 27 February on Showtime__, with a UK broadcaster still TBC._

 

… we have a small favour to ask. We’d like to thank you for
putting your trust in our journalism last year - and invite you to
join the million-plus people in 180 countries who have recently taken
the step to support us financially, keeping us open to all, and
fiercely independent.

In 2021, this support sustained investigative work into offshore
wealth, spyware, the 6 January insurrection, the corporate actors
behind the climate crisis, and the abuses of Big Tech.

The new year, like all new years, will hopefully herald a fresh sense
of cautious optimism, and there is certainly much for us to focus on
in 2022 - the US midterms, the ongoing fight for racial justice, the
next round in the struggle against the pandemic and a World Cup.

With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we can set our own agenda
and provide trustworthy journalism that’s free from commercial and
political influence, offering a counterweight to the spread of
misinformation. When it’s never mattered more, we can investigate
and challenge without fear or favour.

Unlike many other media organisations, Guardian journalism is
available for everyone to read, regardless of what they can afford to
pay. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater
numbers of people can keep track of global events, understand their
impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take
meaningful action.

If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution,
however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our
future. SUPPORT THE GUARDIAN FROM AS LITTLE AS $1 – IT ONLY TAKES A
MINUTE. THANK YOU.

Support the Guardian

Available for everyone, funded by readers

Contribute
[[link removed]] Subscribe
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
* [[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web [[link removed]]
Submit via email
Frequently asked questions [[link removed]]
Manage subscription [[link removed]]
Visit portside.org [[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 



########################################################################

[link removed]

To unsubscribe from the xxxxxx list, click the following link:
[link removed]