View this email in your browser
An update from FactCheck.org 
U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Rachel K. Young-Porter

The Facts about the Unvaccinated & Boosters

We deal with facts and figures all the time. But one figure -- posted to President Joe Biden's official government Twitter account on Feb. 5 -- was startling: "Unvaccinated individuals are 97 times more likely to die compared to those who are boosted."

It is accurate, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

As FactCheck.org staffer D'Angelo Gore writes, "The CDC says that, as of Dec. 4, the weekly COVID-19 death rate among unvaccinated adults was 9.74 per 100,000 population, and the rate was 0.1 per 100,000 population for people 18 and older who were fully vaccinated with a booster dose."

But, for some, facts don't matter. One Twitter user responded to the president's tweet by falsely implying the "unvaccinated" included those who had received "1 or 2 jabs" of the vaccine. But that's not true. 


The CDC’s “Rates of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Vaccination Status” webpage contains a footnote that defines  “unvaccinated" as those who have “not been verified to have received COVID-19 vaccine.”

Read the full story, "Latest CDC Data: Unvaccinated Adults 97 Times More Likely to Die from COVID-19 Than Boosted Adults."

HOW WE KNOW
One of our go-to sources is the Congressional Research Service -- a department within the Library of Congress that does research for Congress. On Feb. 3, President Joe Biden claimed of gun manufacturers: "They're the only industry in America that is exempted from being able to be sued by the public.” But CRS proved him wrong. Other industries have certain legal protections, too. For example, CRS has said that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act “shields manufacturers, distributors, healthcare providers, and other entities from liability for injuries resulting from the use or administration of certain medical products during a public health emergency,” including the COVID-19 pandemic. Read more.
FEATURED FACT
Under the Biden administration, approximately 1.87 million people were apprehended trying to cross the southern border illegally (not at a legal checkpoint) from February through December 2021, according to the latest data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Of those 1.87 million, 56% — more than 1 million people — represent migrants who were immediately expelled under Title 42, a public health law the Trump administration began invoking at the southwest border in March 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic and which Biden has continued in a modified form. Given the high recidivism rate, about a quarter of the 1.87 million were repeat offenders. For more information, read "Cotton Distorts Border Apprehension Impact."
WORTHY OF NOTE
In honor of Black history month, Annenberg Classroom -- a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, home of FactCheck.org -- offers five films for educators to use in their classrooms. Four of them are available to the public. 

The films, which were done in partnership with the Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands, tell the story of people such as Dollree “Dolly” Mapp, a woman who stood up to the police when they tried to enter her home without a search warrant in 1957. Her act of defiance led to a landmark Supreme Court ruling in Mapp v. Ohio that limited police powers.

You can watch Mapp's story here. See the full list of films here
REPLY ALL

Reader: An unvaccinated elderly friend of mine has Covid and is receiving hydroxychloroquine treatment. What does the CDC or the medical science community in general have to say about the efficacy of this substance or known side effects if any?

FactCheck.org Director Eugene Kiely: There hasn’t been much new about hydroxychloroquine. The last story we did about the subject was in July 2021, “No New Revelation on Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19.”

As we wrote at the time: 

[R]andomized controlled clinical trials, in which one group of patients is given the medication and another receives standard care, haven’t found a benefit in mortality or other clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients.

Data from such a trial, among other evidence, led the Food and Drug Administration in June 2020 to revoke an emergency use authorization it had issued three months earlier giving some patients easier access to hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine if they couldn’t participate in a clinical trial. In revoking the EUA, the agency said the drugs, which are also used to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, were “unlikely to be effective in treating COVID-19 for the authorized uses in the EUA.” The FDA said the “known and potential benefits” of the drugs “no longer outweigh” the risks.

As of July 2021, the CDC’s treatment guidelines said this on its website about the risks of taking “Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine and/or Azithromycin”:

Adverse Effects
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have similar toxicity profiles, although hydroxychloroquine is better tolerated and has a lower incidence of toxicity than chloroquine. Cardiac adverse events that have been reported in people who received hydroxychloroquine include QTc prolongation, Torsades de Pointes, ventricular arrythmia, and cardiac deaths.

The use of azithromycin has also been associated with QTc prolongation, and using it in combination with hydroxychloroquine has been associated with a higher incidence of QTc prolongation and cardiac adverse events in patients with COVID-19.

QTc prolongation is a heart condition in which the heart muscle takes longer than usual to contract and relax. It could cause a heart attack.

Bottom line, the CDC says: "The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends against the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine and/or azithromycin for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients (AI) and in nonhospitalized patients (AIIa)."

Wrapping Up

Here's what else we've got for you this week:

  • "COVID-19 Booster Enhances Protection, Contrary to ‘Immune Fatigue’ Claims": A COVID-19 booster dose increases protection against the coronavirus. But in an interview, comedian Bill Maher incorrectly said COVID-19 booster shots were “useless” and could cause “immune system fatigue.” Online, others have made similar claims. There is no basis for the notion that the immune system would tire out, even after repeated boosters. 
  • "Biden Repeats False Claims at Gun Violence Meeting": In remarks at a Feb. 3 gun violence prevention task force meeting, President Joe Biden repeated claims about gun rights and gun manufacturing that fact-checkers have previously found to be false.
  • "Florida Video Shows Legal Migrant Workers, Not ‘Busloads of Illegals’": Dozens of people stayed at a Florida hotel in January while employed as temporary farmworkers for a wholesale plant nursery. But a Facebook video and a tweet by State Rep. Anthony Sabatini falsely claimed they were “illegals” — sparking a protest outside the hotel. Attorneys for the nursery said all of them had visas to work in the U.S.
  • "Facebook Post Misleads on NIH’s Position on Ivermectin": The National Institutes of Health has not recommended and the Food and Drug Administration has not approved ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment. But a Facebook post misleadingly implies that an article published on the NIH website is an endorsement of the drug to treat COVID-19. The NIH and FDA have said more clinical studies are needed.  
Y lo que publicamos en español (English versions are accessible in each story):
  • "DeSantis da información engañosa sobre tratamientos con anticuerpos contra el COVID-19 resistentes a ómicron": Luego de que la Administración de Medicamentos y Alimentos (FDA, por sus siglas en inglés) retirara su autorización para el uso de dos tratamientos contra el COVID-19 con anticuerpos monoclonales por la alta probabilidad de que no sean efectivos contra la variante ómicron, el gobernador de Florida, Ron DeSantis, afirmó erróneamente que la decisión se había adoptado “sin un ápice de información clínica” que la fundamente. Puede que no haya estadísticas de pacientes, pero los estudios de laboratorios que sugieren que los tratamientos no ayudarán a las personas infectadas por ómicron son robustos. 
  • "Estudios muestran que las dosis de refuerzo potencian la inmunidad contra ómicron": Ni la serie de vacunación primaria ni la inmunidad natural están deteniendo mayormente las infecciones por la variante ómicron, pero las investigaciones muestran que las dosis de refuerzo aumentan sustancialmente la protección. Sin embargo, el senador republicano Rand Paul afirmó que un caso de COVID-19 proporciona “mejor inmunidad que la vacuna”.
Have a question about COVID-19 and the vaccines? Visit our SciCheck page for answers. It's available in Spanish, too.
Donate to Support Our Work
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2022 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.






This email was sent to [email protected]
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania · 202 S 36th St. · Philadelphia, Pa 19104 · USA