Despite new variants, many prisons and jails have returned to pre-pandemic population levels.

Prison Policy Initiative updates for February 10, 2022 Exposing how mass incarceration harms communities and our national welfare

State prisons and local jails appear indifferent to COVID outbreaks, refuse to depopulate dangerous facilities [[link removed]] While some prison systems and local jails have maintained historically low populations, others have returned to pre-pandemic levels, despite the ongoing dangers of COVID-19 and new, more transmissible variants. [[link removed]]

by Emily Widra

The COVID-19 pandemic is far from over, particularly inside prisons and jails. The death rate from COVID-19 in prisons is more than double [[link removed]] that of the general U.S. population. As cases and hospitalizations climb outside prison walls, there is no doubt that cases are spiking [[link removed]] in jails and prisons across the country. In state and federal prisons, over 2,900 [[link removed]] people [[link removed]] have died of COVID-19, almost 476,000 people have [[link removed]] been infected, and thousands [[link removed]] of additional cases are linked to individual county jails. Even now, when more than 75% of people in the U.S. have received at least one dose [[link removed]] of the vaccine, correctional staff are hesitant [[link removed]] to [[link removed]] get [[link removed]] vaccinated [[link removed]] or receive boosters [[link removed]], and prison systems are slow to roll out boosters [[link removed]] to incarcerated people. As the more contagious [[link removed]] Omicron variant ravages parts of the nation and renders hospitals completely overrun [[link removed]], nearly three quarters of prisons [[link removed]] are experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks; public health officials [[link removed]] continue [[link removed]] to recommend [[link removed]] reducing prison populations as a primary method of risk reduction. In fact, in October 2021, the American Public Health Association adopted a policy in support of decarceration as a public health matter and new [[link removed](22)00045-9/fulltext] research [[link removed](22)00045-9/fulltext] shows the detrimental effect of COVID-19 on all-cause mortality in state prisons. Despite the clear need for smaller confined populations, the data show that with just a few exceptions, state and local authorities are allowing their prison and jail populations to return to dangerous, pre-pandemic levels.

The federal Bureau of Prisons, state governments and departments of corrections, and local justice system officials have a responsibility to protect the health and lives of those who are incarcerated. After almost two years of outbreak after outbreak in prisons and jails, correctional authorities must be held accountable for their repeated failure to reduce populations enough to prevent the illness and death of those who are incarcerated and in surrounding [[link removed]] communities [[link removed]].

Prisons

Even in states where prison populations have dropped, there are still too many people behind bars to accommodate social distancing, effective isolation and quarantine, and the increased health care needs of incarcerated people. For example, although California has reduced the state prison population by about 18% since the start of the pandemic, it has not been enough to prevent large COVID-19 outbreaks in the state's prisons [[link removed]], and the prison system has witnessed a 300% increase in infections among incarcerated people over the past few weeks [[link removed]] and a 212% increase in cases among staff. In fact, as of December 15th, 2021, California's prisons were still holding more people than they were designed for, at 113% [[link removed]] of their design capacity [[link removed]] (and up from 103% in January 2021 [[link removed]]). Considering the continued overcrowding in the California prison system, it's not surprising that the state is responsible for eight out of the ten largest COVID-19 prison clusters [[link removed]].

Prison population data for 50 state prison systems as reported directly from the state Departments of Correction and the Marshall Project and federal data as published weekly by the federal Bureau of Prisons.

Many states' prison populations are the lowest they've been in decades, but this is not because more people are being released from prisons; in fact, fewer people are. Data from 2020, recently released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, shows that prisons nationwide released 10% fewer people in 2020 [[link removed]] than in 2019. Instead, data suggest most of the population drops we've seen over the past 20 months are due to reduced prison admissions, not increasing releases. In the states for which we have recent data, both admissions and releases have decreased in recent years, making clear that prisons are not using all available tools [[link removed]] at their disposal to stop the spread of the virus in their facilities. The significant drop in admissions to prisons was largely an unintended consequence of court delays and suspension of transfers from local jails early in the pandemic, rather than any dedicated decarceration efforts. Finding ways to continue reducing the number of people admitted to correctional facilities is critical to lowering the number of people behind bars, but to quickly decarcerate, states should release far more people, too.

These twelve states publish monthly release and admission data for 2018, 2019, 2020, and most of 2021. These data show us a pattern of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: reducing prison admissions, while releasing fewer people from prison.

Despite evidence that large-scale releases — which have been used periodically in states across the U.S. — do not inherently endanger public safety [[link removed]], most states have elected to release people from prison on a mostly case-by-case [[link removed]] basis, which an October 2020 report [[link removed]] from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine charitably described as "procedurally slow and not well suited to crisis situations." In short, this choice ignores the crisis of COVID-19.

Thankfully, some states have recognized the inefficiency of case-by-case releases and the necessity of larger-scale releases. For example, in New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy signed [[link removed]] bill S2519 [[link removed]] in October 2020, which allowed for the early release of people with less than a year left on their sentences. A few weeks after the bill was signed, more than 2,000 people were released [[link removed]] from New Jersey state prisons on November 4th, 2020. In February 2021, North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper announced [[link removed]]a legal settlement had been reached to release 3,500 people in state custody (with 1,500 of those releases to take place within 90 days). The releases were the result of a NAACP lawsuit challenging prison conditions in North Carolina during COVID-19. The state said it would release people using discretionary sentence credits (similar to "good time credits"), home confinement, and post-release supervision. But these instances of larger-scale release efforts taking place in state prison systems are the exception, not the rule.

Jails

Jail populations, like prison populations, are lower now than they were pre-pandemic. Initially, many local officials — including sheriffs, prosecutors, and judges — responded quickly to COVID-19 and reduced their jail populations. In a national sample of 415 county jails of varying sizes, almost all (98%) decreased their populations from March to May of 2020, resulting in an average change of a 33% population decrease across all 415 jails at the start of COVID-19. These population reductions came as the result of various policy changes [[link removed]], including police issuing citations in lieu of arrests, prosecutors declining to charge people for "low-level offenses," courts reducing cash bail amounts, and jail administrators releasing people detained pretrial or those serving short sentences for "nonviolent" offenses.

But those early-pandemic, common-sense policy changes didn't last long. Between May 2020 and February 2021, the populations of 83% of the jails in our sample increased, reversing course from the earlier months of the pandemic. As of December 2021, 28% of the jails in our sample have higher populations now than they did in March 2020. Overall, the average population change across these 415 jails from March 2020 to December 2021 has diminished to only a 10% decrease, while the average population change from July 2021 to December 2021 has dropped to 0%, suggesting that the early reforms instituted to mitigate COVID-19 have largely been abandoned.

For example, by mid-April 2020, the Philadelphia city jail population reportedly dropped by more than 17% after city police suspended low-level [[link removed]] arrests and judges released [[link removed]] "certain nonviolent detainees" jailed for "low-level charges." But just two weeks later — as the pandemic raged on — the Philadelphia police force announced that they would resume arrests [[link removed]] for property crimes, effectively reversing the earlier reduction efforts. Similarly, on July 10th, 2020, the sheriff of Jefferson County (Birmingham), Alabama, announced that the jail would limit admissions [[link removed]] to only "violent felons that cannot make bond." That effort was quickly abandoned when the jail resumed normal admission operations [[link removed]] just one week later. The increasing jail populations across the country suggest that after the first wave of responses to COVID-19, many local officials have allowed jail admissions to return to business as usual.

Jails across the country initially responded to COVID-19 by reducing the number of people detained, but that trend reversed direction in May 2020, only two months after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic.

In New York City, the jail population sharply declined after the pandemic was declared. Importantly, NYC jails — particularly Rikers Island [[link removed]] - were some of the first jails in the country to witness a COVID-19 outbreak. And yet, across different demographics, NYC jail populations have slowly leveled out, suggesting that the policies responsible for the necessary decarceration are no longer in practice. In addition to suffering the effects of COVID-19, Rikers Island is also facing an unprecedented crisis [[link removed]] following a history of over-incarceration and, according to a federal monitor [[link removed]], "decades of mismanagement." At a time when jail populations should be at an all-time low, Rikers Island's confined population surpassed the pre-COVID-19 population in July 2021. The population only dropped back down below the pre-pandemic level at the end of September 2021, when Gov. Hochul signed the Less is More Act [[link removed]], which reduced the number jailed for technical violations of supervision.

Graph showing the daily count of the NYC jail population by 5 key metrics. By all metrics, the NYC jail population dropped quickly at the start of the pandemic, but then started to rise again.

Even before COVID-19, prisons [[link removed]] and jails [[link removed]] were a threat to public health [[link removed]]and considered notoriously dangerous places [[link removed]] during any sort of viral outbreak. As the U.S. Supreme Court recognized [[link removed]] years before the pandemic, by taking away a person's ability to care for their own medical needs, carceral facilities must make sure that those who are incarcerated receive proper medical care — failure to do so can constitute a violation of of the Eighth Amendment's guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment and necessitate a reduction in the carceral population [[link removed]]. And yet, correctional facilities continue to be the source of a large number of infections in the U.S. The COVID-19 death rate in prisons is almost three times higher [[link removed]] than among the general U.S. population, even when adjusted for age and sex (as the prison population is disproportionately young and male). Since the early days of the pandemic, public health professionals [[link removed]], corrections officials [[link removed]], and criminal justice reform advocates [[link removed]] have agreed that decarceration is necessary to protect incarcerated people and the community at large from COVID-19. Decarceration efforts must include releasing more people from prisons and jails. Despite this knowledge, state, federal, and local authorities have failed to release people from prisons and jails on a scale sufficient to protect incarcerated people's lives - and by extension, the lives of everyone in the communities [[link removed]] where incarcerated people eventually return, and where correctional staff live and work.

* * *

For more information, including appendices with the prison and jail population data used in this analysis, and detailed footnotes, see the full online version of this briefing [[link removed]].

Please support our work [[link removed]]

Our work is made possible by private donations. Can you help us keep going? We can accept tax-deductible gifts online [[link removed]] or via paper checks sent to PO Box 127 Northampton MA 01061. Thank you!

Other news: COVID looks like it may stay. That means prison medical copays must go. [[link removed]]

Medical copays behind bars never make sense, particularly during a highlight infectious, viral pandemic. Despite this, our recent briefing [[link removed]] shows that many states are still charging incarcerated people to access medical care.

Please support our work [[link removed]]

Our work is made possible by private donations. Can you help us keep going? We can accept tax-deductible gifts online [[link removed]] or via paper checks sent to PO Box 127 Northampton MA 01061. Thank you!

Our other newsletters Ending prison gerrymandering ( archives [[link removed]]) Criminal justice research library ( archives [[link removed]])

Update which newsletters you get [link removed].

You are receiving this message because you signed up on our website [[link removed]] or you met Peter Wagner or another staff member at an event and asked to be included.

Prison Policy Initiative [[link removed]]

PO Box 127

Northampton, Mass. 01061

Web Version [link removed] Unsubscribe [link removed] Update address / join other newsletters [link removed] Donate [[link removed]] Tweet this newsletter [link removed] Forward this newsletter [link removed]

You are receiving this message because you signed up on our website or you met Peter Wagner or another staff member at an event and asked to be included.

Prison Policy Initiative

PO Box 127 Northampton, Mass. 01061

Did someone forward this to you? If you enjoyed reading, please subscribe! [[link removed]] Web Version [link removed] | Update address [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed] | Share via: Twitter [link removed] Facebook [[link removed] Email [link removed]