Email
Southwest Gas and NV Energy-funded groups advocate in favor of gas in Nevada’s “future of gas” docket
| From | Energy and Policy Institute <[email protected]> |
| Subject | Southwest Gas and NV Energy-funded groups advocate in favor of gas in Nevada’s “future of gas” docket |
| Date | February 10, 2022 1:02 PM |
Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
** Southwest Gas and NV Energy-funded groups advocate in favor of gas in Nevada’s “future of gas” docket ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
By Keriann Conroy on Feb 09, 2022 04:02 pm
Several groups calling on the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada (PUCN) for the continued use and expansion of fossil gas infrastructure in the state have ties to Southwest Gas and NV Energy, or their respective charitable foundations.
The PUCN opened an investigation ([link removed]) for the long-term planning of fossil gas utility services in the state last May. In response, HELP of Southern Nevada, the Henderson Chamber of Commerce and others that have received contributions from Southwest Gas, NV Energy, or their respective foundations submitted comments backing the gas companies plans.
Southwest Gas and NV Energy have a vested interest in Nevada’s continued use and expansion of gas infrastructure. Southwest Gas serves fossil gas to 790,000 customers in the state and over a million additional customers in Arizona and California. The company also owns ([link removed]) the Great Basin Gas Transmission Company, which operates an interstate pipeline system that extends from the Idaho-Nevada border to the California-Nevada border. Southwest Gas’ parent company also recently acquired ([link removed]) Dominion Energy’s Questar Pipeline company, which added 2,160 miles of interstate gas pipeline assets in the Rocky Mountain region to the business.
NV Energy is predominantly an electric utility with 1.3 million electric customers ([link removed]) in Nevada. Still, the utility also serves ([link removed]) nearly 200,000 gas customers in the state, and Berkshire Hathaway Energy (BHE), which owns NV Energy, has significant fossil gas assets as well. The holding company owns MidAmerican Energy, which serves ([link removed]) gas to 774,000 customers in Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, and South Dakota, and pipeline companies Northern Natural Gas ([link removed]) and Kern River ([link removed]) . BHE also purchased
([link removed]) Dominion Energy’s East Coast gas transmission and storage business in 2020. The acquisition added an additional 5,700 miles of gas pipelines and a 25% stake of the Cove Point liquefied natural gas export facility in Maryland to BHE’s fossil fuel portfolio. (BHE abandoned ([link removed]) the purchase of Questar following an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission).
State organizations filing comments to the PUCN in support of the utilities are invaluable to SWG and NV Energy’s political interests and their investors’ pockets. This practice, however, is not limited to Nevada utilities. It is a common utility-industry tactic to influence lawmakers and regulators alike. For example, in a first-of-its-kind analysis in 2019, the Energy and Policy Institute examined ([link removed]) the philanthropic contributions of 10 leading investor-owned electric utilities in the U.S. We found that all of these major utilities use their charitable giving to manipulate politics, policies and regulation in ways designed to increase shareholder profits, often at the expense of low-income communities, who often bear the brunt of climate impacts and suffer higher levels of air pollution.
** Utility-funded non-profits, associations, and chambers of commerce mobilize to support gas
------------------------------------------------------------
Of the 15 chambers of commerce, charities, and organizations that favored the utilities’ continued use of gas, EPI found that 9 have received utility money or are connected to the utility in another way.
Two 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations with a focus on affordable housing, Veterans Village, which is a project of SHARE, and HELP of Southern Nevada, filed comments in support of gas infrastructure in Nevada. The Southwest Gas Charitable Foundation contributed ([link removed]) $2,500 in 2019 and 2020 to HELP as part of the “Golfer’s Roundup Breakfast Sponsorship.” Senior Vice President of Operations Eric Debonis also sits on the Executive Board. The gas utility contributed $200 of board dues on behalf of Debonis in 2019. The NV Energy Charitable Foundation also donated ([link removed]) $10,000 to HELP in 2019 for a homeless youth shelter, and contributed ([link removed]) an additional $17,500 to the non-profit in 2020. Veterans
Village/SHARE received ([link removed]) $5,000 in 2019 and $2,500 in 2020 from ([link removed]) Southwest Gas’ foundation.
The Nevada Restaurant Association submitted comments ([link removed]) to the PUCN supporting continued fossil gas use because “control over the intensity of heat directly affects the flavor of food” and claimed that the restaurant industry would suffer if fossil gas were limited. Southwest Gas contributed ([link removed]) at least $500 in company dues to the Nevada Restaurant Association in 2019. The gas utility’s Arizona subsidiary attempted to have its customers pay for these dues as part of their rates, according to an exhibit ([link removed]) in Southwest Gas’ rate case application. However, the Arizona Residential Utility Consumer Office caught the payments and allocated the fees to shareholders. Many restaurant associations
have become political allies of gas utilities as gas stoves heat up the battle over electrification. The American Gas Association has used Facebook and Instagram ad campaigns ([link removed]) to improve public perceptions of gas stoves, even as years of mounting evidence makes clear ([link removed]) the risk that indoor gas use poses to human health and safety.
Other groups providing comments in support of gas include the Henderson Chamber of Commerce and the Latin Chamber of Commerce. Southwest Gas is a sponsor ([link removed]) of Henderson Chamber of Commerce’s Development Association, which is a $3,500 annual fee. NV Energy is a “Diamond” spon ([link removed]) s ([link removed]) or ([link removed]) , which is a $20,000 annual fee, according to a chamber spokesperson. The Latin Chamber of Commerce confirmed with EPI that both NV Energy and Southwest Gas are members, but would not confirm the membership status of either utility. Based on the LCC’s website ([link removed]) , the utilities could be paying between $500 and $25,000 annually. In 2020, both chambers of commerce signed a letter with SWG to Nevada Governor Sisolak
([link removed]) to express concerns about the state’s greenhouse gas emission reduction goals established by SB 254 in 2019. The coalition that signed the letter outlined the important role of “Clean, Affordable, Natural Gas” in reducing emissions and creating jobs.
The Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas and the Southern Nevada Homebuilder’s Association were other associations that weighed in with the PUCN. The Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas urged ([link removed]) the PUCN to include “renewable natural gas” in any long-term gas planning process. According to emails obtained by Energy and Policy Institute, Southwest Gas intends to “aggressively pursue ([link removed]) ” RNG in the coming years and is a “leadership” member of the coalition, which costs ([link removed]) $30,000 in annual dues. Southwest Gas has proposed that its Arizona customers pay for the majority of the Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas annual dues, according to an exhibit ([link removed]) in the rate case. Other
industry documents reveal that the gas industry planned to use RNG advocacy ([link removed]) as part of a pipeline expansion strategy to “mitigate” stakeholder opposition, specifically from environmental groups.
The Southern Nevada Homebuilder’s Association, a local trade association representing the residential construction industry in the region, highlighted ([link removed]) concerns regarding electrification. SWG and NV Energy are both members of the association ([link removed]) , paying annual dues of at least $1,592 ([link removed]) .
** Environmental advocates challenging the “future of gas”
------------------------------------------------------------
The PUCN’s docket to explore gas in Nevada comes in the wake of other states also opening similar investigations, including the Oregon Public Utilities Commission ([link removed]) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities ([link removed]) . Many states are pursuing more ambitious climate goals, and because methane – the primary component of fossil gas – has a warming potential 84 to 87 times ([link removed]) greater over a 20-year period than carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas has risen to the top of many advocates and commissions agendas. And with good reason: The latest UN IPCC report ([link removed]) makes clear that cutting methane emissions can help produce the type of quick and meaningful climate reductions necessary to keep temperatures below 1.5 degree celsius ([link removed]) .
Environmental advocates have also shown up to file public comments with the PUCN regarding Nevada’s future of gas. Western Resource Advocates, Natural Resource Defense Council, Sierra Club, Nevada Conservation League, and the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, submitted a joint, nearly 300 page statement in one filing. Their joint comments focused on the greenhouse gas reduction goals ([link removed]) set by the Nevada legislature. The groups propose a wide variety of paths to reduce emissions since the various sectors of the economy will reduce emissions on different schedules. For instance, the groups submitted modeling to show how gas can be eliminated ([link removed]) in the residential and commercial building sector, and explain that hydrogen and types of biomethane can be used in the industrial sector to reduce those emissions.
In a separate filing, RMI takes a more hard line stance against fossil gas development and calls out ([link removed]) the false claims about electrification made by Southwest Gas:
“Southwest Gas has repeatedly made the incorrect claim that ‘policy-driven electrification’ “offers no certainty that it will reduce GHG emissions.” This claim is patently false, as many comments on the record have clearly shown … SWG hinges much of its argument on customer preference for gas. However, this preference does not acknowledge the context in which gas became the known and familiar fuel for many customers, or the ways in which that context and priorities have shifted.”
RMI also proposes several policies ([link removed]) to eliminate line extension allowances and halt subsidies for gas allowances.
Organizations representing similar comments to RMI include the Mormon Women for Ethical Government, Advanced Energy Economy, CHR Inc. and CHISPA. The American Lung Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, Southern Nevada Health District, Dignity Health St. Rose Dominican and Nevada Nurses Association submitted a joint statement ([link removed]) addressing Nevada’s air quality challenges and the importance of transitioning away from fossil gas in order to safeguard clean air and Nevadans’ health.
The final comments in response to the utilities under investigation were submitted January 7, 2022 to the PUCN.
Featured image source: Wikimedia Commons, Ken Lund ([link removed](700879471).jpg) .
The post Southwest Gas and NV Energy-funded groups advocate in favor of gas in Nevada’s “future of gas” docket ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]
** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** Xcel Energy supports gas industry group pushing false claims in Colorado ([link removed])
** New records suggest Alabama Power paid millions to shadowy consulting groups involved in scandals throughout the Southeast ([link removed])
** Utility trade associations say utilities are disclosing climate risks to investors. Major investors disagree ([link removed])
** AEP admits in court: Its corporate accountability reports are mere “puffery” ([link removed])
** FERC issues Notice of Inquiry to understand how it can protect customers from subsidizing trade association political activities ([link removed]
============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.
Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
------------------------------------------------------------
By Keriann Conroy on Feb 09, 2022 04:02 pm
Several groups calling on the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada (PUCN) for the continued use and expansion of fossil gas infrastructure in the state have ties to Southwest Gas and NV Energy, or their respective charitable foundations.
The PUCN opened an investigation ([link removed]) for the long-term planning of fossil gas utility services in the state last May. In response, HELP of Southern Nevada, the Henderson Chamber of Commerce and others that have received contributions from Southwest Gas, NV Energy, or their respective foundations submitted comments backing the gas companies plans.
Southwest Gas and NV Energy have a vested interest in Nevada’s continued use and expansion of gas infrastructure. Southwest Gas serves fossil gas to 790,000 customers in the state and over a million additional customers in Arizona and California. The company also owns ([link removed]) the Great Basin Gas Transmission Company, which operates an interstate pipeline system that extends from the Idaho-Nevada border to the California-Nevada border. Southwest Gas’ parent company also recently acquired ([link removed]) Dominion Energy’s Questar Pipeline company, which added 2,160 miles of interstate gas pipeline assets in the Rocky Mountain region to the business.
NV Energy is predominantly an electric utility with 1.3 million electric customers ([link removed]) in Nevada. Still, the utility also serves ([link removed]) nearly 200,000 gas customers in the state, and Berkshire Hathaway Energy (BHE), which owns NV Energy, has significant fossil gas assets as well. The holding company owns MidAmerican Energy, which serves ([link removed]) gas to 774,000 customers in Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, and South Dakota, and pipeline companies Northern Natural Gas ([link removed]) and Kern River ([link removed]) . BHE also purchased
([link removed]) Dominion Energy’s East Coast gas transmission and storage business in 2020. The acquisition added an additional 5,700 miles of gas pipelines and a 25% stake of the Cove Point liquefied natural gas export facility in Maryland to BHE’s fossil fuel portfolio. (BHE abandoned ([link removed]) the purchase of Questar following an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission).
State organizations filing comments to the PUCN in support of the utilities are invaluable to SWG and NV Energy’s political interests and their investors’ pockets. This practice, however, is not limited to Nevada utilities. It is a common utility-industry tactic to influence lawmakers and regulators alike. For example, in a first-of-its-kind analysis in 2019, the Energy and Policy Institute examined ([link removed]) the philanthropic contributions of 10 leading investor-owned electric utilities in the U.S. We found that all of these major utilities use their charitable giving to manipulate politics, policies and regulation in ways designed to increase shareholder profits, often at the expense of low-income communities, who often bear the brunt of climate impacts and suffer higher levels of air pollution.
** Utility-funded non-profits, associations, and chambers of commerce mobilize to support gas
------------------------------------------------------------
Of the 15 chambers of commerce, charities, and organizations that favored the utilities’ continued use of gas, EPI found that 9 have received utility money or are connected to the utility in another way.
Two 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations with a focus on affordable housing, Veterans Village, which is a project of SHARE, and HELP of Southern Nevada, filed comments in support of gas infrastructure in Nevada. The Southwest Gas Charitable Foundation contributed ([link removed]) $2,500 in 2019 and 2020 to HELP as part of the “Golfer’s Roundup Breakfast Sponsorship.” Senior Vice President of Operations Eric Debonis also sits on the Executive Board. The gas utility contributed $200 of board dues on behalf of Debonis in 2019. The NV Energy Charitable Foundation also donated ([link removed]) $10,000 to HELP in 2019 for a homeless youth shelter, and contributed ([link removed]) an additional $17,500 to the non-profit in 2020. Veterans
Village/SHARE received ([link removed]) $5,000 in 2019 and $2,500 in 2020 from ([link removed]) Southwest Gas’ foundation.
The Nevada Restaurant Association submitted comments ([link removed]) to the PUCN supporting continued fossil gas use because “control over the intensity of heat directly affects the flavor of food” and claimed that the restaurant industry would suffer if fossil gas were limited. Southwest Gas contributed ([link removed]) at least $500 in company dues to the Nevada Restaurant Association in 2019. The gas utility’s Arizona subsidiary attempted to have its customers pay for these dues as part of their rates, according to an exhibit ([link removed]) in Southwest Gas’ rate case application. However, the Arizona Residential Utility Consumer Office caught the payments and allocated the fees to shareholders. Many restaurant associations
have become political allies of gas utilities as gas stoves heat up the battle over electrification. The American Gas Association has used Facebook and Instagram ad campaigns ([link removed]) to improve public perceptions of gas stoves, even as years of mounting evidence makes clear ([link removed]) the risk that indoor gas use poses to human health and safety.
Other groups providing comments in support of gas include the Henderson Chamber of Commerce and the Latin Chamber of Commerce. Southwest Gas is a sponsor ([link removed]) of Henderson Chamber of Commerce’s Development Association, which is a $3,500 annual fee. NV Energy is a “Diamond” spon ([link removed]) s ([link removed]) or ([link removed]) , which is a $20,000 annual fee, according to a chamber spokesperson. The Latin Chamber of Commerce confirmed with EPI that both NV Energy and Southwest Gas are members, but would not confirm the membership status of either utility. Based on the LCC’s website ([link removed]) , the utilities could be paying between $500 and $25,000 annually. In 2020, both chambers of commerce signed a letter with SWG to Nevada Governor Sisolak
([link removed]) to express concerns about the state’s greenhouse gas emission reduction goals established by SB 254 in 2019. The coalition that signed the letter outlined the important role of “Clean, Affordable, Natural Gas” in reducing emissions and creating jobs.
The Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas and the Southern Nevada Homebuilder’s Association were other associations that weighed in with the PUCN. The Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas urged ([link removed]) the PUCN to include “renewable natural gas” in any long-term gas planning process. According to emails obtained by Energy and Policy Institute, Southwest Gas intends to “aggressively pursue ([link removed]) ” RNG in the coming years and is a “leadership” member of the coalition, which costs ([link removed]) $30,000 in annual dues. Southwest Gas has proposed that its Arizona customers pay for the majority of the Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas annual dues, according to an exhibit ([link removed]) in the rate case. Other
industry documents reveal that the gas industry planned to use RNG advocacy ([link removed]) as part of a pipeline expansion strategy to “mitigate” stakeholder opposition, specifically from environmental groups.
The Southern Nevada Homebuilder’s Association, a local trade association representing the residential construction industry in the region, highlighted ([link removed]) concerns regarding electrification. SWG and NV Energy are both members of the association ([link removed]) , paying annual dues of at least $1,592 ([link removed]) .
** Environmental advocates challenging the “future of gas”
------------------------------------------------------------
The PUCN’s docket to explore gas in Nevada comes in the wake of other states also opening similar investigations, including the Oregon Public Utilities Commission ([link removed]) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities ([link removed]) . Many states are pursuing more ambitious climate goals, and because methane – the primary component of fossil gas – has a warming potential 84 to 87 times ([link removed]) greater over a 20-year period than carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas has risen to the top of many advocates and commissions agendas. And with good reason: The latest UN IPCC report ([link removed]) makes clear that cutting methane emissions can help produce the type of quick and meaningful climate reductions necessary to keep temperatures below 1.5 degree celsius ([link removed]) .
Environmental advocates have also shown up to file public comments with the PUCN regarding Nevada’s future of gas. Western Resource Advocates, Natural Resource Defense Council, Sierra Club, Nevada Conservation League, and the Southwest Energy Efficiency Project, submitted a joint, nearly 300 page statement in one filing. Their joint comments focused on the greenhouse gas reduction goals ([link removed]) set by the Nevada legislature. The groups propose a wide variety of paths to reduce emissions since the various sectors of the economy will reduce emissions on different schedules. For instance, the groups submitted modeling to show how gas can be eliminated ([link removed]) in the residential and commercial building sector, and explain that hydrogen and types of biomethane can be used in the industrial sector to reduce those emissions.
In a separate filing, RMI takes a more hard line stance against fossil gas development and calls out ([link removed]) the false claims about electrification made by Southwest Gas:
“Southwest Gas has repeatedly made the incorrect claim that ‘policy-driven electrification’ “offers no certainty that it will reduce GHG emissions.” This claim is patently false, as many comments on the record have clearly shown … SWG hinges much of its argument on customer preference for gas. However, this preference does not acknowledge the context in which gas became the known and familiar fuel for many customers, or the ways in which that context and priorities have shifted.”
RMI also proposes several policies ([link removed]) to eliminate line extension allowances and halt subsidies for gas allowances.
Organizations representing similar comments to RMI include the Mormon Women for Ethical Government, Advanced Energy Economy, CHR Inc. and CHISPA. The American Lung Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, Southern Nevada Health District, Dignity Health St. Rose Dominican and Nevada Nurses Association submitted a joint statement ([link removed]) addressing Nevada’s air quality challenges and the importance of transitioning away from fossil gas in order to safeguard clean air and Nevadans’ health.
The final comments in response to the utilities under investigation were submitted January 7, 2022 to the PUCN.
Featured image source: Wikimedia Commons, Ken Lund ([link removed](700879471).jpg) .
The post Southwest Gas and NV Energy-funded groups advocate in favor of gas in Nevada’s “future of gas” docket ([link removed]) appeared first on Energy and Policy Institute ([link removed]) .
Read in browser » ([link removed])
[link removed] [link removed]
** Recent Articles:
------------------------------------------------------------
** Xcel Energy supports gas industry group pushing false claims in Colorado ([link removed])
** New records suggest Alabama Power paid millions to shadowy consulting groups involved in scandals throughout the Southeast ([link removed])
** Utility trade associations say utilities are disclosing climate risks to investors. Major investors disagree ([link removed])
** AEP admits in court: Its corporate accountability reports are mere “puffery” ([link removed])
** FERC issues Notice of Inquiry to understand how it can protect customers from subsidizing trade association political activities ([link removed]
============================================================
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2022 Energy and Policy Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in at our website via our Contact Us page.
Our mailing address is:
Energy and Policy Institute
P.O. Box 170399
San Francisco, CA 94117
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
Message Analysis
- Sender: Energy and Policy Institute
- Political Party: n/a
- Country: United States
- State/Locality: n/a
- Office: n/a
-
Email Providers:
- MailChimp