As calculated through the Finance weighting formula, the California CPI is rising at rates just slightly below the national inflation numbers. This outcome, however, has to be considered from the fact that the state’s inflationary trends are being applied to a much higher cost base, overall and in particular when looking at the energy numbers. In the most recent Regional Price Parity data from US Bureau of Economic Analysis for 2020, California was the 3rd most expensive state behind only Hawaii and New Jersey. At the MSA level, California contained half of the 10 most expensive urban areas in the country, and 12 of the 20 most expensive.
From a policy perspective, a great deal of consideration has been given to how California can pursue a more equitable recovery. The actions, however, have only looked at certain elements while allowing energy costs to be driven to new levels, not just higher than in previous years but higher than virtually any other state. Actions have focused on rents, not the related utility costs required to live within those households. Actions have focused on working conditions, not the rising cost of workers getting to their jobs especially with mass transit becoming less of an option than it was even prior to the pandemic.
Historically, energy cost spikes of the magnitude being imposed on California have typically led to recessions. Costs rise rapidly and thereby squeeze household budgets that must then be cut back to pay the more essential energy bills, leading to reduced sales and jobs in other parts of the economy.
Lower income households throughout the state have already experienced this effect, although the scale of the cost impacts is beginning to affect other income levels as well. In the most recent Household Pulse Survey from the US Census Bureau:
-
19.4% of the state’s population age 18 and over was in a household that was unable to pay a utility bill or pay the full amount in at least one or two of the prior twelve months, and 4.8% were unable to do so almost every month. For household incomes of less than $50,000, the rates rose to 40.0% and 10.6%, respectively. For household incomes of less than $25,000, the rates were 47.9% and 14.7%.
-
Even cutting back on energy use has done little to help. In total, 19.2% were in households that kept the temperature at a level that felt unsafe or unhealthy at least one or two months, and 6.0% did so almost every month. For household income less than $50,000, the rates were 34.5% and 11.1%. For household incomes of less than $25,000, the rates were 34.8% and 10.7%.
-
Cutting back on other basic costs of living has been more prevalent. In total, 25.7% were in households reducing spending on other necessities such as medicine or food in order to pay their utility bill at least one or two months, and 7.0% did so almost every month. For household incomes under $50,000, the rates jump to 49.8% and 15.4%. For household incomes under $25,000, the rates are 55.3% and 16.2%.
The survey results are for the period December 29, 2021, through January 10, 2022.
|