If there’s one takeaway we want you to have from our work, it’s that we’re focused on building a diverse decarbonization strategy inclusive of all potential technological solutions.
View this email in your browser
[link removed]
[link removed]
Hi John,
If there’s one takeaway we want you to have from our work, it’s that we’re focused on building a diverse decarbonization strategy inclusive of all potential technological solutions. Not only will tech-inclusive policies make it easier and cheaper to cut emissions rapidly. They will lay the foundation for the future of American industry and manufacturing, representing an investment in American jobs, competitiveness, and global security. In addition to our recent work, the news this week shows this increasing support not only in the US but around the world.
1. USICA VS. COMPETES
This week, ProPublica and the New Yorker published an exceptional piece of reporting
[link removed]
by Alec McGillis on the history of coal production in Germany. McGillis focused on the state’s targeted effort to move away from coal, its social and economic impact on coal communities, and how it compares to the US’ own energy transition.
Here’s our take: whether intentional or not, when the climate community vilifies fossil fuels, fossil fuel workers who rely on coal, oil, and gas production for their livelihood see themselves being condemned. As a result, climate activism has however inadvertently perpetuated an “us vs. them” dichotomy that has made fossil fuel communities feel as if they’ve been pitted against the rest of the world. This has made it more difficult to have productive clean energy conversations within these communities.
At this point, the market is naturally moving toward cleaner alternatives to coal. These alternatives are more cost-competitive, and they have fewer negative impacts on public health and the environment. But good communication on climate change should take an “all-for-one, one-for-all” approach that gives fossil fuel communities a seat at the table as the country transitions and acknowledges the work they’ve invested in building out our existing energy infrastructure.
2. CHANGING THE CONVERSATION AROUND COAL
This week, ProPublica and the New Yorker published an exceptional piece of reporting
[link removed]
by Alec McGillis on the history of coal production in Germany. McGillis focused on the state’s targeted effort to move away from coal, its social and economic impact on coal communities, and how it compares to the US’ own energy transition.
Here’s our take: whether intentional or not, when the climate community vilifies fossil fuels, fossil fuel workers who rely on coal, oil, and gas production for their livelihood see themselves being condemned. As a result, climate activism has however inadvertently perpetuated an “us vs. them” dichotomy that has made fossil fuel communities feel as if they’ve been pitted against the rest of the world. This has made it more difficult to have productive clean energy conversations within these communities.
At this point, the market is naturally moving toward cleaner alternatives to coal. These alternatives are more cost-competitive, and they have fewer negative impacts on public health and the environment. But good communication on climate change should take an “all-for-one, one-for-all” approach that gives fossil fuel communities a seat at the table as the country transitions and acknowledges the work they’ve invested in building out our existing energy infrastructure.
3. H2 ON THE MOVE
There has been a lot of news around hydrogen, both in the US and around the world, in the past few months: New Mexico is considering a bill to expand low-carbon hydrogen production
[link removed]
; the Loan Programs Office at the Department of Energy issued its first non-nuclear loan guarantee in six years to a “turquoise” hydrogen plant
[link removed]
; Sweden has signed an agreement to launch the world’s first nuclear-powered “pink hydrogen” plant
[link removed]
; and Cemex, a leading multinational building materials company is investing in a clean hydrogen startup
[link removed]
to develop a low-carbon alternative to fossil fuels that power cement production.
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law includes $9.5 billion for clean hydrogen research, demonstration, and deployment, including the creation of clean hydrogen hubs and funding to bring down the cost of hydrogen electrolyzers and build out a domestic supply chain for hydrogen production.
So why is there so much investment in hydrogen as a climate solution?
Zero-carbon hydrogen has several uses. In the transportation sector, for example, hydrogen has a vital role to play in decarbonizing medium- and heavy-duty vehicles
[link removed]
, with hydrogen fueling helping to power the future of the trucking and shipping industries.
We can also use hydrogen in industrial applications to curb emissions from hard-to-abate sectors like steel production
[link removed]
. Sweden’s HYBRIT plant
[link removed]
, for instance, uses electrolysis to convert renewable energy into hydrogen, which it then used to power the production of low-carbon steel. This is one example of the industrial use for hydrogen that can help reduce the embodied carbon emissions in construction materials and ensure we’re on track to successfully decarbonize the industry sector.
Above all, hydrogen is becoming a critical alternative to fossil fuels in some of the most challenging industries and sectors to electrify.
4. BE SURE TO RSVP: PLUGGING IN TO FEDERAL CLEAN ENERGY INNOVATION PROGRAMS
[link removed]
Resgister HERE!
[link removed]
5. WHAT WE'RE READING
Earlier this week, the White House released Building A Better America
[link removed]
, a 465-page guidebook to steer the implementation of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for states. The guidebook is a comprehensive roadmap to the funding available under the new law.
In Bloomberg, Josh Saul
[link removed]
reports on a new venture spearheaded by BlackRock, NextEra Energy, and Daimler to build and operate battery charging and hydrogen refueling stations for trucks across the US. The three organizations are investing $650 million to build out charging stations along freight routes, which will be immensely helpful to transition our freight and trucking sector to low- and zero-carbon alternatives for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles.
In the Daily Beast, Thor Benson
[link removed]
breaks down why support for advanced nuclear as a climate solution is growing rapidly and why small modular reactors are helping reshape our perception of nuclear energy.
Let’s keep the conversation going,
Carly Berke
Climate and Energy Press Coordinator | Third Way
818.422.2759 :: @ThirdWayEnergy
[link removed]
Jared DeWese
Deputy Director | Third Way
202.427.3709 :: @jareddewese
[link removed]
Mary Sagatelova
Communications and Content Advisor | Third Way
216.394.7615 :: @MarySagatelova
[link removed]
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up to receive The Grid in your inbox HERE
[link removed]
.
Copyright © 2022 Third Way. All rights reserved.
Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences.
[link removed]
