From Brennan Center for Justice <[email protected]>
Subject Redistricting Roundup: February 2, 2022
Date February 2, 2022 10:42 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Redistricting Goes into Overtime in Ohio

([link removed])

[Redistricting Roundup]

The State of Play

Redistricting is entering its final stretch. As of February 1, a total of 32 states had passed new congressional maps and 33 states had passed state legislative maps, though in two states, Ohio and Alabama, courts have ordered congressional maps to be redrawn. Ohio’s legislative maps have been redrawn under court order and are currently being reviewed by the state supreme court.

The Brennan Center has two trackers you can use to keep up with the redistricting cycle. Our Redistricting Map Tracker

([link removed])

contains links to all of the newly passed maps while our Redistricting Litigation Roundup

([link removed])

outlines the legal cases pending over new plans. All told, 44 cases around the country are challenging newly passed congressional or legislative maps as racially discriminatory or partisan gerrymanders — or both.

Featured Pieces

Redistricting Goes into Overtime in Ohio

Republicans aren’t giving up on their attempts to gerrymander Ohio. Last month the Ohio Supreme Court struck down the state’s gerrymandered legislative maps that were challenged in a series of lawsuits, including one brought by the Brennan Center on behalf of community organizations and voters. The state’s redistricting commission then had 10 days to pass new maps, but instead of coming to a bipartisan compromise, the maps were minimally changed and passed once again on a party-line vote. Voters and groups challenging the original plans have filed objections to the new plans.

In a blog post, the Brennan Center’s Harry Black, Yurij Rudensky, and Alicia Bannon write

([link removed])

that the commission was “trying to slap some paint on what amounts to a broken foundation.” They explain

([link removed])

: “The facts are clear: the new maps were drawn by Republican map drawers and passed on party lines. To purportedly achieve ‘proportionality’ in the Ohio House of Representatives, as required by the state constitution, the commission converted Republican districts into razor-thin Democratic ones while leaving Republicans in safe seats. All told, 14 Democratic seats are toss-up districts while zero Republican-leaning districts fall into the same category.”

If the court finds that the redrawn maps also violate the state constitution, the redistricting commission will once again reconvene to draw a third set of maps. You can read more about the Brennan Center’s involvement in the fight for fair legislative maps in Ohio here

([link removed])

Documents Reveal Trump Administration’s ‘Unprecedented’ Attempts to Influence 2020 Census

Documents and correspondence obtained from a lawsuit filed by the Brennan Center under the Freedom of Information Act regarding the 2020 Census reveal the full extent of the Trump administration’s attempts to undermine a fair count. The documents show that political appointees ignored the protestations of career Census Bureau officials and that many more states agreed to share citizenship data with the Trump administration than had previously been reported.

Brennan Center senior counsel Kelly Percival writes

([link removed])

, “These FOIA results show just how fragile the census process is. It took timely litigation, advocacy, and career Census Bureau officials pushing back at political interference to ensure that the 2020 Census did not fail … In the meantime, it’s time to start thinking about what guardrails should be put in place to protect future censuses from reaching the brink of disaster.”

You can read more about the Brennan Center’s lawsuit to obtain these documents here

([link removed])

Featured Maps

The congressional map proposed by New York Democratic legislators would dramatically alter the state’s political geography, with Rep. Claudia Tenney’s (R-New Hartford) district serving as an illustrative example.

Source: Redistricting &amp; You

([link removed])

In the current map (left), the heavily Democratic city of Utica is included in Tenney’s Upstate district (NY-22), which was one of the most competitive districts in the country in 2020. By contrast, in the redrawn map (right), the district is surgically dismantled with Utica and much of NY-22 combined with more Democratic-leaning areas closer to New York City to create a district (NY-19) that would have supported President Biden by 10 points. In response to the proposed plan, Rep. Tenney has decided to run

([link removed])

in a Republican-leaning district anchored in western New York, though that has led to accusations of carpetbagging

([link removed])

Redistricting in the News

In a new piece

([link removed])

for The Guardian, writer Michael Harriot writes that, despite claims to the contrary, new redistricting plans devised by Republicans across the country revolve around race, not politics. He writes

([link removed])

, “For years, there has been a subtle campaign to redefine racism by the intent and not the effects of discriminatory actions. According to this new American translation, disenfranchising entire communities by suppressing their voting power is not necessarily racist as long as the person didn’t mean to be racist.”

The North Carolina Supreme Court heard oral arguments

([link removed])

Wednesday morning on the state’s new congressional and legislative redistricting plans. Advocacy groups and voters allege that the plans violate the state constitution because they heavily favor Republican candidates. The court is expected to rule quickly on whether it has the authority to order new plans.

Alabama is appealing

([link removed])

a lower federal court’s decision to block its new congressional plan to the U.S. Supreme Court. The three-judge lower court, which included two Trump appointees, found that Alabama’s congressional map violated the rights of Black voters

([link removed])

because it did not include a second Black opportunity district. The case is the first redistricting case to reach the Supreme Court this cycle.

A prominent Republican Texas state senator has admitted

([link removed])

that the newly drawn Senate District 10 in the Fort Worth area violates the Voting Rights Act because it was drawn to include Black and Latino voters in a whiter, more rural district to dilute their voting power. The sworn declaration from Sen. Seliger (R- Amarillo) was brought to light as a three-judge panel considers challenges to Texas’s enacted plans. His statement contradicts those of redistricting committee chair, who has repeatedly insisted that the maps were drawn “race-blind.”

Read more from the Brennan Center on how SD-10 disempowers communities of color here

([link removed])

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) has vetoed

([link removed])

the congressional map submitted by the state legislature, meaning that the courts will ultimately decide the new district lines. The state supreme court has ordered a lower court judge to serve as a special master

([link removed])

and submit a report with her redistricting recommendations by February 7. The court will hear oral arguments over the special master's report on February 16.

Tennessee’s new congressional map is expected to soon be signed into law by Gov. Bill Lee (R), meaning that Nashville, the state’s largest city, will be split among three districts. Incumbent Rep. Jim Cooper (D-Nashville) has said

([link removed])

he will not run for reelection because he was, “gerrymandered out of a congressional seat.” Critics of the plan also claim that it constitutes a racial gerrymander

([link removed])

because it divides Nashville’s Black communities.

New York Democrats have released their congressional redistricting proposal

([link removed])

after the state’s redistricting commission failed to agree on a redistricting plan

([link removed])

Because of the deadlock, responsibility for map drawing has shifted to Democratic legislators, who hold a supermajority in both houses for the first time in decades. Their plan has already triggered sharp allegations of partisan gerrymandering for cutting the number of Republican-leaning districts in half, from eight to four.

In some parts of the country, communities of color are struggling to gain a seat at the table. But in other places, map drawers are being responsive to demographic change, creating more electoral opportunities for communities of color that have previously been shut out of power. In California, the Orange County Board of Supervisors map includes a Latino-majority district

([link removed])

for the first time. The new district has opened a door for Garden Grove City Councilwoman Kim Nguyen, a self-proclaimed “Vietxican” to run to become

([link removed])

Orange County’s first Latina supervisor. Nguyen is no stranger to new opportunities. She was first elected to the Garden Grove City Council after its at-large districts were struck down by a court in 2016 and replaced with single-member districts.

You can find earlier editions of our Redistricting Roundup here

([link removed])

([link removed])

Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law

120 Broadway, Suite 1750 New York, NY 10271

646-292-8310

tel:646-292-8310

[email protected]

Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences

[link removed]

Want to stop receiving these emails? Click here to unsubscribe

[link removed]

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis