From Lindsay Koshgarian <[email protected]>
Subject National Priorities: What are we doing in Ukraine?
Date January 31, 2022 7:48 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[[link removed]]
John,
Five months ago, the U.S. left Afghanistan and ended a twenty-year war. Today, we stand at the brink of another one as the situation in Ukraine grows more dire.
We have to stop this endless loop. A military response in Ukraine threatens to undermine diplomatic efforts to resolve that crisis, and threatens countless Ukrainian lives. But our endless appetite for international conflict also shortchanges the investments in people that we need to thrive.
At the end of 2021, Congress failed to pass a $170 billion-a-year investment [[link removed]] in families, child care, and climate, while a vast bipartisan majority approved a Pentagon budget more than four times as high.
We are here to change that, and we need your help – so we are launching the first National Priorities Project [[link removed]] newsletter to share our work. You’ll be hearing from us once a month about how your tax dollars underwrite war and draconian law enforcement, instead of protecting public health, slowing climate change, or ending poverty.
You’ll also hear about the movements that are leading the fight to change our priorities - movements like the Poor People’s Campaign [[link removed]] , Defund Hate [[link removed]] , and climate activists. [[link removed]]
The key to changing our national priorities is to change the budget. We’re proud to link arms with these movements to build a safer, more just world, and we’re so grateful you’re with us.
Peace,
Lindsay, Ashik, and Lorah
[link removed] [[link removed]]THIS WEEK'S TRADEOFF
When Senator Joe Manchin blocked the passage of the Build Back Better Act, he did more than block funding for pro-family tax credits, health care, child care, home care, clean energy and more. He also signaled that in a country that spends $81 billion each year [[link removed]] for our military to guard the world’s oil supply, we aren’t willing to spend two-thirds as much — $55 billion per year — to transition from fossil fuels.
[link removed] [[link removed]]CIVILIANS KILLED IN U.S. POST-9/11 WARS
More than 20 years after the U.S. invaded Afghanistan, more than 900,000 lives have been lost to the fighting - many of them civilians. Recent reporting by The New York Times has shed light on the U.S. military’s failure to follow its own rules, and the civilian deaths that resulted. The legacy of the post 9/11 wars is one of destruction. In our September report [[link removed]] , we found that the U.S. had spent $21 trillion on foreign and domestic militarization, including wars, violence against immigrants, and racial profiling, since 9/11.
[[link removed]]PENTAGON CUTS REQUIRE A
PROGRESSIVE FOREIGN POLICY
Real cuts to Pentagon spending will require a new kind of foreign policy - one that prioritizes diplomacy and humanitarian aid over war and intimidation. This month, Representative Barbara Lee and Representative Pramila Jayapal introduced a resolution [[link removed]] to implement a progressive foreign policy that cuts Pentagon spending. As Congresswoman Lee said, “It’s far past time we take our foreign policy into the 21st century. We should be leading with diplomacy and human needs as the path to global security. The post 9/11 wars taught us that perpetual war takes countless lives, wastes trillions of dollars and does not make us any safer. To combat the challenges we face around the globe — like climate change, global health, and poverty — we should be investing our resources away from tanks and drones and towards the needs of people.”
"It is difficult to contain my feelings of anger and outrage when I hear lawmakers denigrate low and middle income individuals and families as 'moochers' on the take when they are willing to allocate billions to wealthy corporations with literally no strings attached."
Sister Karen M. Donahue,
The Hypocrisy of the Federal Spending Debate [[link removed]]
[[link removed]]RECOMMENDED READS
“What would US intervention in Ukraine really look like?” [[link removed]]
Responsible Statecraft
“ Martin Luther King Jr., Internationalist [[link removed]] ”
Khury Peterson-Smith, Foreign Policy in Focus
“Yes, There Were 10 Good Things About 2021” [[link removed]]
Medea Benjamin, Common Dreams
“A Dam in Syria Was on a ‘No- Strike’ List. The U.S. Bombed It Anyway.” [[link removed]]
Dave Philipps, Azmat Khan and Eric Schmitt, The New York Times
“Democrats ask Biden to overhaul counterterrorism, drone strike strategy” [[link removed]]
Caroline Vakil, The Hill
“ Jayapal, Lee Resolution Promotes More Peaceful US Foreign Policy [[link removed]] ”
Brett Wilkins, Common Dreams
[link removed] [[link removed]]JOIN THE DISCUSSION!
Follow our work on Twitter [[link removed]] , Facebook [[link removed]] , and Instagram [[link removed]] !
DONATE!
Donate [[link removed]]
National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies
[link removed] [[link removed]]
[MAIN NPP EMAIL] | unsubscribe: [link removed]
Institute for Policy Studies
1301 Connecticut Avenue Ste 600
Washington, DC 20036
United States
202-234-9382 | [email protected] [[email protected]] | www.ips-dc.org [www.ips-dc.org]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis