(Lower) Payday
This week we passed a bill to disapprove the report of the State Officers Compensation Commission. The commission sets pay for the governor, lieutenant governor, commissioners, and legislators. It's a politically fraught subject, but we managed to find unanimity in turning it down.
A super-short history to start: Legislative and top-of-the-executive-branch pay had stagnated for a couple of decades and some legislators had been perp-walked for taking bribes in the mid-2000's before then-Rep. Mike Doogan passed a bill to put the pay issue in non-legislative hands. Under the law he passed, the commission issues a report at the top of a legislative session, then legislators have 60 days to disapprove it by passing a bill into law, or the report takes effect automatically.
This year's version would have done some weird and inappropriate stuff. A few commission members were really hung up on the daily amount legislators who travel to the capital get to cover the costs of working away from home. So the commission proposed both cutting it by 2/3 and requiring receipts for everything from rent to milk to sandwiches.
That approach would require creating a whole new accounting position in the legislature just to keep track of all the small dollar receipts. (That's assuming you could hire someone to spend their days going through supermarket receipts to decide whether the chewing gum is reimbursable, or whether the Windex wipes are for cleaning the windows in a legislator's apartment (reimbursable) or car (not.) I'd rather floss a hippo.)
The commission also would have paid legislators' expenses only when the governor called a special sessions, not when the legislature called itself in. You can call me old fashioned, but I don't want the pay plan to shift the constitutional balance of power between the legislative branch and the executive.
There's a Juneau-specific angle there, too. Employers should never require workers to pay out of pocket when they have to work away from home. Not even grubby ol' politicians. Breaking that principle as the commission suggested would have created an incentive for legislators to call special sessions in Southcentral where fewer legislators have to pay out of pocket (even though the cost to the state treasury would be higher!) Clearly, Alaska is better off covering legislators' costs no matter who calls a special session.
At the same time, the commission would have increased legislators' salaries by about $14,000 per year. That bump in taxable income would certainly not make up for reducing non-taxable per diem $200 per day over the 121 days my out-of-town colleagues need to be in the capital city.
There are some problems with the way legislative per diem works today. There are ways to do it better and more fairly. But this report fell way, way short.
In the interest of full disclosure, this vote stung just a little bit. Juneau-based legislators don't qualify for per diem, so I would have gotten the pay raise and lost nothing on the per diem cut. But I'm not in the senate to serve my pocketbook, and the report clearly didn't pass muster for the state as a whole.
I hope the commission will put their heads together and come up with a smart re-write of legislative per diem for next year.