[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
Voting Rights Bill Blocked by Parties Unknown—According to Headlines Julie Hollar ([link removed])


Reuters: U.S. Senate Democrats fail in bid to pass voting rights bill

Reuters' headline (1/20/21 ([link removed]) ) put the emphasis on the Democrats' failure rather than the Republicans' success.

With the GOP leaning ever more heavily on a strategy of voter suppression ([link removed]) and election manipulation ([link removed]) to gain power, Democrats finally made an effort to stop some of those maneuvers by bringing a voting rights bill before the Senate. But Wednesday's unified GOP filibuster ([link removed]) —and the refusal by Democratic senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin to modify Senate rules to allow a majority vote on this one bill—killed the attempt.

To the New York Times headline writers (1/19/21 ([link removed]) ), the story went: "After a Day of Debate, the Voting Rights Bill Is Blocked in the Senate." Their counterparts at CNN.com (1/19/21 ([link removed]) ) chose: "Senate Democrats Suffer Defeat on Voting Rights After Vote to Change Rules Fails." At Reuters (1/20/21 ([link removed]) ): "US Senate Democrats Fail in Bid to Pass Voting Rights Bill."

The morning after the late-night vote (1/20/21), the Washington Post's homepage version of its headline read: "Voting Rights Bill Effectively Dead as Senate Rejects Filibuster Change."

None of those headlines were given top billing, at least not by late morning Eastern Standard Time. By lunchtime, the Post's headline had dropped out of the Top Stories section, and CNN.com was giving its top slot to "A Look at Biden's First Year in False Claims" (1/20/22 ([link removed]) ).
CNN: Fact check: A look at Biden's first year in false claims

CNN's lead example (1/20/22 ([link removed]) ) of factchecking Biden was whether the president had falsely claimed to have once driven an 18-wheeler.

But notice what—or more precisely, who—is missing from all the headlines. We don't even get a nod to any responsible actor. ("Bill Killed in GOP-Involved ([link removed]) Filibuster," anyone?)

The Washington press corps seems much more comfortable identifying democracy-endangering ([link removed]) GOP obstructionism when framing it as a story about Democrats. In an extraordinarily rare instance of a story that that acknowledged the GOP as the main culprit, New York Times congressional reporter Jonathan Weisman ([link removed]) (1/19/21 ([link removed]) ) managed nevertheless to make the focus Democratic infighting and impotence in a story with the subhead, "Prominent Democrats are expressing rage at their party’s two filibuster holdouts, rather than at Republicans who have blocked their voting rights bill." Weisman wrote:

The remarkable vitriol Democratic activists are training on two members of their own party has largely given Republicans a pass for blocking the bill and standing by new state laws devised to limit access to the ballot box and empower partisan actors to administer elections and count votes.

Manchin ([link removed]) and Sinema ([link removed]) surely deserve intense scrutiny for their corrupt and anti-democratic role in this chapter of our country's history. But how many times have the supposedly moderate GOP senators that the press corps so praised over their work on the bipartisan infrastructure bill been named in a headline about the voting rights bills? It's not Democratic activists at fault for "giving Republicans a pass" here—but don't hold your breath waiting for journalists to take responsibility for their own role ([link removed]) in the withering of a democracy their corporate owners have little interest in defending ([link removed]) .


Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
​

© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .