Jews and non-Jews in Israel: the apartheid allegation
20 January 2022
Israel is increasingly accused of being an “apartheid” state. There is only one other country that has been the subject of that allegation – South Africa.
Apartheid and persecution are crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute, for good reason. Countries that are built on racial segregation should be punished.
Yes, Israel is a Jewish State. But that does not make it an apartheid state.
The legal definition of "Apartheid" is unclear (see the Herzberg/Kern article below). But it probably requires at least proof of a deliberate and systematic attack on, or oppression of, another racial group.
Jews are a people, not a race. So discriminaiton between Jews and non-Jews is not about race. That aside, there are many groups in Israel, including: Arab Muslims, Bedouin, Ahmadiyya, Arab Christians, Druze, Syriac Christians (Arameans and Assyrians), Copts, Samaritans, Armenians, Circassians, ethnic Russians, Ukrainians and Belarussians, and other immigrants from the former Soviet Union, such as Armenians, Georgians, Azeris, Uzbeks, Moldovans, Tatars of Russian or Ukrainian ethnicity; Finns, Baháʼís, Vietnamese, and African Hebrew Israelites of Jerusalem (a religious sect of Black Americans founded in 1960).
Some of these groups may feel marginalized or even discriminated against. Many Arab Israelis certainly do. But that is not unique. Many countries have problems with discrimination. That is not apartheid. Israel does not seek, nor does it have policies, "attacking" or "oppressing" any of these groups.
Israeli citizens – whatever their religion, ethnicity or nationality - have full civil and religious rights. Just look at the fact that an Arab Muslem is a member of the government.
Israel is far more pluralist and democratic than most countries in the region. You will not find Christian or Jewish members of the government in the Islamic Republic or Iran or Saudi Arabia.
The situation in East Jerusalem is complex, in part because of its difficult past (including Jordan’s ethnic cleansing of Jews in 1948-1967), and in part because many in the large Arab population (under pressure of the PLO) choose not to have Israeli citizenship, rather residency. As a result, they do not enjoy all the benefits of citizenship.
In Judea and Samaria (commonly called the “West Bank”), where Israel does not claim full sovereignty, it is true Israelis are treated differently from non-Israelis. The former are subject to Israeli law, the latter not. However, this is far from illegal. Even assuming the law of belligerent occupation applies (this is contested), the law of occupation contemplates separate legal regimes for protected persons and for nationals of an “Occupying Power”. One can criticize the occupation, and argue that Israel should withdraw from all or part of the territories. But that is an entirely different discussion, and is not about apartheid.
The "apartheid" claim is most often brought by those who simply don't like the idea of a Jewish state. It is at best unjustified, at worst mendacious.
The Editorial Team - Israel & Christians Today
|