John,

The first week of the new year will be a busy one for pro-democracy litigation. Here’s a rundown of what we’re keeping an eye on this week:

A North Carolina state court will hold a trial on the state’s new districts.
Starting today, the Wake County Superior Court will hold a combined trial in Harper v. Hall [[link removed]] and North Carolina League of Conservation Voters v. Hall [[link removed]], cases challenging North Carolina’s new congressional and legislative districts. The plaintiffs allege the new districts are extreme partisan gerrymanders that favor Republicans and dilute the voting power of Black North Carolinians in violation of the state Constitution and ask the court to block their use in 2022 and order the creation of new, fair maps.

The North Carolina Supreme Court has paused candidate filing for the 2022 elections and delayed the state’s primary from March to May to ensure there’s a final decision on the maps before the elections. Per the state Supreme Court order, the trial court must rule on the maps by Jan. 11 and any appeal will be heard on an expedited basis. [link removed]

The trial will begin at 9:00 a.m. EST, with closing statements scheduled for Thursday. A live stream will be provided by WRAL-TV of Raleigh. [link removed]

Three suits challenging Alabama’s congressional map will have a hearing.
Tomorrow, Tuesday, Jan. 4, a federal court in Alabama will hold a preliminary injunction hearing in three cases challenging Alabama’s new congressional map on racial grounds. The cases — Singleton v. Merrill [[link removed]], Caster v. Merrill [[link removed]] and Milligan v. Merrill [[link removed]] — challenge the map for different reasons, but all ask the court to block the map from being used and order the creation of a map that accurately reflects the state’s Black population.

As this hearing is only on motions for a preliminary injunction, not a trial on the cases’ merits, there will be more hearings and legal steps before litigation over the congressional districts is resolved. [link removed]

A special panel in Minnesota will hold oral arguments over redistricting.
Also on Tuesday, a special panel appointed by the Minnesota Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Sachs v. Simon, a consolidated impasse litigation case over the state’s congressional and legislative maps. The cases argue Minnesota will likely not be able to adopt new maps by the Feb. 15 deadline and the courts will need to enact maps instead, as it has every decade since 1980. [link removed]

The plaintiffs all prepared their own proposals for Minnesota’s new congressional and legislative maps, which can be found here. The oral arguments will give plaintiffs the opportunity to argue in support of their proposals. [link removed]

Oral arguments will begin at 9:30 a.m. CST. A livestream will be available on the state Supreme Court’s website here. [link removed]


Keep an eye on our Alerts page for new updates and feel free to use the drop down menu on the Cases page to find more information about any of these cases. And be sure to check out our latest piece, “Looking Ahead: Litigation in the New Year,” for info about other cases coming down the pike. [link removed]

Keep up the fight,
Team Democracy Docket




Democracy Docket is the leading progressive media platform dedicated to providing information, opinion and analysis about voting rights, elections, redistricting and democracy.

Like getting our exclusive updates on all things democracy? We depend on the support of our readers to keep bringing you the latest on the fight for democracy. We can’t do this without you.

Support our work today! [[link removed]]

Wear democracy on your sleeve — visit our merchandise store for tees, mugs and more. [[link removed]]

Email is the best way to keep in touch, but click here to unsubscribe: [link removed] .

Democracy Docket
PO Box 733
Great Falls, VA 22066
United States

Follow us on social:

[[link removed]]
[link removed]]
[[link removed]]
[[link removed]]

Shop for Democracy Docket merchandise: [[link removed]]