Here is the Heritage Take on the top issues today.Please reply to this email to arrange an interview.
Russian invasion of Ukraine could be costly even without US troops involved, experts say <[link removed]>
– A further invasion into Ukraine <[link removed]> could be costly
for Russian forces <[link removed]> even if American and NATO troops don’t get involved because of the assistance they’ve already provided to Ukrainian forces <[link removed]>, a panel of outside experts said Monday. “The Ukraine that we have today is not the same Ukraine in 2014 [when Russia invaded Crimea],” said Luke Coffey, director of the Allison Center for Foreign Policy at the Heritage Foundation, during a panel discussion on tensions in Eastern Europe. “The Ukrainian Armed Forces are far
better trained, equipped and resourced, and are more motivated than they were in 2014 … The Ukrainians can fight for themselves.” Heritage Experts: Alexis Mrachek <[link removed]> and Nile Gardiner <[link removed]>
As Homicide Rates Break Records, Black Lives Clearly
Don’t Matter to BLM or to Soros-Backed Rogue Prosecutors <[link removed]> – The rise of rogue prosecutors such as Krasner has
dovetailed with the rise of BLM, and its push for “abolition.” In their lexicon, abolition has nothing to do with ending slavery, of course. As BLM founder Patrisse Cullors explained in this Feb. 22 video <[link removed]>, “To really put it simply, abolition is the getting rid of police, prisons and jails, surveillance, and courts.” In the video, Cullors adds that she learned about abolition and restorative justice at the age of 21 in a workshop put together by Critical Resistance, which was founded by Communist Party leader Angela Davis. So when BLM said in its statement this week, “In an abolitionist society, this trial would not be taking place,” they are completely correct. Under abolition, Smollett would not have been arrested, prosecuted, tried, or convicted. No criminal would be. And that’s the problem. Heritage Expert: Mike Gonzalez <[link removed]>
Inflation Hits Nearly 40-Year High as Biden Administration Embraces Reckless Spending <[link removed]> –
“President Biden represents an embrace of radical, socialist policies that will exacerbate inflation <[link removed]>, labor shortages <[link removed]>, and supply chain <[link removed]> disruptions Americans are facing. Make no mistake, these enormous expansions of government spending by the left will come at a cost. Americans will pay either through direct taxation, higher borrowing costs, or the hidden tax of inflation. This inflation tax can be the most destructive and painful of all. Additionally, Democrats are trying to effectively suspend the debt limit with a one-time bill that eliminates traditional safeguards, allowing Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer a blank line to write in whatever debt increase he desires—likely a significant number that would dramatically increase nondefense spending, enact the massive tax and spending package, plus leave funds for
future pet projects.” Heritage Expert: Joel Griffith <[link removed]>
Christendom’s Greatest Satirist <[link removed]> – The willingness to forsake
partisanship in the pursuit of moral truth: Here is a partial remedy for the political and cultural rifts that seem to threaten our democratic republic. Jean Le Clerc, a Protestant scholar in Amsterdam, summarized the influence of Erasmus: “It cannot be doubted that he has contributed greatly to the enlightenment of his age and to preparing men to accept a day of which he himself has seen only the dawn.” America could benefit from another enlightenment, this time in the spirit of Erasmus. Heritage Expert: Joe Loconte <[link removed]>
Wikipedia Threatens to Purge ‘Communist Mass Killings’ Page, Cites Anti-Communist
Bias <[link removed]> – Wikipedia’s efforts to delete the article represent a dangerous combination of censorship and communist apologia. And given the fact that the specter of communism still represents a global threat, Wikipedia’s willingness to sanitize the evil philosophy represents a dire threat. To their credit, it appears that Wikipedia has hit the brakes on deleting the article. But that doesn’t mean we should become complacent. “There have been many victims of communism. They cannot be forgotten,” warns Edwards. “These voices of the victims are calling out to us through the decades … Communist China continues to be a threat to the safety, prosperity, and freedom of the rest of the world.” Wikipedia’s actions do a disservice to those victims of Marx’s failed philosophy. It is up to us to guard their memories, so that the atrocities of communism stay buried in the past where they belong. Heritage Expert: Douglas Blair <[link removed]>
Why Taiwan is The Lynchpin of China’s Quest for Global Dominance <[link removed]> –
Taiwanese firms have more than 60
percent <[link removed]> of the global market share of chip production. Were China to somehow jeopardize that capacity, Beijing would have the ability to influence other countries to an overwhelming degree. This would affect not only the United States but such key allies as Japan and Germany. It is not for the United States to determine the ultimate fate of Taiwan, or dictate the relationship between Beijing and Taipei. But it is in America’s interest to ensure that this sensitive region, with its enormous impact on global economic security, does not see the outbreak of conflict. American efforts to support a peaceful resolution of the Taiwan Straits issue, including deterring a Chinese use of force against the island of Taiwan, are an integral part of sustaining global peace and stability. Heritage Expert: Dean Cheng <[link removed]>
Will New York Times, Washington Post Return Pulitzers for Misleading ‘Russia Collusion’
Stories? <[link removed]> – In 2018, journalists from The New York Times and The Washington Post won a Pulitzer Prize in national reporting for their biased and inaccurate coverage
of Russia’s alleged collaboration <[link removed]> with the Trump campaign to interfere with the 2016 election, a claim we now know was a hoax <[link removed]>. So, when are they going to return the prize? If this sounds familiar, it should. This is not the first time the prize—which is supposed to recognize outstanding achievement and public service in journalism <[link removed]>—was awarded for misleading and discredited coverage. Heritage Expert: Hans von Spakovsky <[link removed]>
-
