Legislative Updates
Build Back Better Act Passes House, Moves to Senate
On Nov. 19, the House of Representatives voted to approve the Build Back Better Act, which provides $1.75 trillion in economic recovery funds, including $150 billion in affordable housing expenditures. The vote came after resistance from Democratic centrists in the House who refused to vote on the Act without a full Congressional Budget Office analysis. Build Back Better, along with its historic investments in homelessness solutions, now awaits a vote in the Senate. Advocates should continue to contact their Congressional representatives and urge them to vote yes on the Act.
Keeping Renters Safe Act Awaits Vote in Committee
At the end of September, Rep. Cori Bush introduced H.R. 5307 – Keeping Renters Safe Act of 2021 to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The Bill clarifies the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement and maintain a residential eviction moratorium, and directs HHS to implement such a moratorium that will remain in effect for at least 60 days following the conclusion of the COVID-19 public health emergency. The Act has 49 cosponsors in the House and 5 in the Senate, and is endorsed by 81 organizations, including the Law Center.
Litigation Updates
Lawsuit Against San Luis Obispo Challenges Citywide Practices of Excluding People Experiencing Homelessness from Public Spaces
California Rural Legal Assistance and the Public Interest Law Project filed a lawsuit against the City of San Luis Obispo, challenging several ordinances that prevent unhoused residents from sheltering in the City’s open spaces and streets. According to the initial complaint, San Luis Obispo has “a policy and practice of citing, fining, and arresting – as well as threatening to cite, fine, and arrest – unsheltered persons to force them to “move along” from public parks, creeks, sidewalks, open spaces, streets, and parking facilities” and the city “often seizes and destroys the personal possessions that these unhoused and unsheltered individuals need for protection, privacy, survival.”
ACLU of Massachusetts Files Geddes v. City of Boston to Stop Encampment Sweeps in Boston
ACLU Massachusetts, along with WilmerHale, filed a lawsuit earlier this month to prevent the City of Boston from clearing out encampments without first rehousing encampment residents. The lawsuit comes after recent encampment evictions that displaced encampment residents and destroyed their property.
Motion for Class Certification Granted in Alabama Panhandling Case
Earlier this month, the District Court for the Middle District of Alabama granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in an ongoing lawsuit challenging panhandling prohibitions in Montgomery, Alabama. The decision allows the named plaintiffs in the case to proceed on behalf of all individuals who will in the future stand on a public street in the state of Alabama for the purpose of soliciting contributions or employment, or who will in the future loiter, remain, or wander in a public place in the State of Alabama for the purpose of begging.
Advocates Prepare to Argue in Ninth Circuit to Keep Preliminary Injunction in Place Protecting People Experiencing Homelessness in Berkeley
In September, Where Do We Go Berkeley, a nonprofit comprised of people experiencing homelessness, obtained a preliminary injunction against the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) that prevented CALTRANS from evicting encampment residents based on the federal and state constitutions and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The District Court for the Northern District of California held in its decision that the Plaintiffs, “have sufficiently shown a likelihood of irreparable injury to the individual plaintiffs if the encampments where they are living were to be closed …” and “state a plausible claim that the discrimination clause affords them the right to a reasonable accommodation” under the ADA.
CALTRANS is currently in the process of appealing the preliminary injunction to the Ninth Circuit, and the Law Center, along with Disability Rights Advocates, plans to file an amicus brief in support of the Plaintiff-Appellees.
Denver Homeless Out Loud Argues Before Tenth Circuit to Stop Denver from Seizing Tents and Belongings
On Nov. 16, Denver Homeless Out Loud made oral arguments before the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals arguing that the preliminary injunction issued by the District Court requiring that Denver provide advance written notice for all sweeps should be upheld. Denver Homeless Out Loud first brought the case in October 2020 to challenge the city of Denver’s practice of conducting encampment sweeps without sufficient notice and seizing and disposing of homeless individuals’ property without due process of law.
Though the preliminary injunction issued by the District Court is narrow in scope, it does prevent Denver from conducting any encampment sweeps without seven days’ advance written notice unless the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment determines that there is a reasonable, evidence-based public health or safety risk that requires an encampment sweep.
Federal Policy Updates
|