The BBB-NWO isn't about climate, it's about control.
Real Clear Energy (11/21/21) reports: "When former President Barack Obama says “We are nowhere near where we need to be” in terms of climate change, he’s not talking about reducing carbon dioxide emissions...After all, the U.S. already leads the world in reducing Co2 emissions thanks in large part to hydraulic fracturing that accelerated during Donald Trump’s presidency. Forbes reports on the emissions reductions that occurred much to the consternation of the news media and its cheerleading for U.N. directives that raise energy costs without impacting climate. The U.S. Energy Information Administration has collected data that shows how innovative drilling techniques has unleashed natural gas, which in turn has been driving down emissions. This trendline has continued into the Biden presidency in part because natural gas has replaced coal and in part because of COVID-19 restrictions on travel and other activities. So, if Obama isn’t talking about emissions, what did he actually meanwhile addressing the U.N’s latest climate change conference in Glasgow, Scotland earlier this month? The answer comes in the form of the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that President Biden signed into law on Monday, and other anti-energy initiatives, ostensibly advanced in the name of climate change. The directives and mandates included in the legislation make it evident that what Obama really meant during his talk at the U.N. is that centralized planners in Europe and America are 'nowhere near' where they would like to be as it relates to implementing coercive policy measures."
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The administration sees higher energy costs not as a problem but as an opportunity. Since it cannot bring down the price of renewables to compete with oil and gas, it needs higher oil and gas prices. But when that happens, as it has, the administration wrings its hands and complains, or tries to sic the FTC on 'price gougers.'"
– Derrick Hollie, Reaching America
|
|
|
|
|
|
