Why expanding federal student aid only worsens the debt crisis
[link removed]
CounterCurrent: The Pell Grant Chicken Comes Before the Egg
Why expanding federal student aid only worsens the debt crisis
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Student Loans/Debt; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - Pell Grant Expansion Actually Hurts Low-Income Students by Neetu Arnold ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Which came first, the federal student loan system or the high cost of college?
Many people approach the student debt crisis like the classic chicken-and-egg riddle. We can all agree that college is too expensive, but we immediately butt heads when trying to explain why. There are plausible arguments for the chicken (student loans) and for the egg (high tuition), but at the end of the day, we can’t really know which came first. Some even say “neither” and point to other causes entirely.
In reality, as NAS Research Associate Neetu Arnold details in her report Priced Out: What College Costs America ([link removed]) , the answer is pretty simple: it’s the chicken. The student loan chicken clearly came before the cost of college egg.
Of course, that chicken was not alone—a whole hen house of government actions, beginning with good-faith initiatives such as the G.I. Bill and President Truman’s “higher education for all” philosophy, aided in flooding American colleges and universities with more students than ever before, while also subsidizing their studies to an unprecedented extent. In response, higher education leaders said “Hey, free money!” and hiked tuition at will. After all, how else are they going to pay for the new lazy river ([link removed]) ?
Many still believe the egg came first, though, and so they advocate for bigger, fatter chickens to help alleviate student debt. One popular proposal as of late is to increase the Pell Grant, a federal aid program launched in the 1970s that currently sits at a maximum of $6,495 per year. President Biden’s Build Back Better Framework ([link removed]) would add $550 to the Pell Grant, but many say this is not enough. Entire organizations have sprung up ([link removed]) in an effort to double the Pell Grant. But would any Pell Grant amount—$6,495, $7,045, or even $12,990—actually help students, particularly low-income students, in the long run?
In this week’s featured article ([link removed]) , Arnold argues a resolute no. For starters, even a doubled Pell Grant is a mere fraction of the cost of many colleges, particularly elite institutions. Pell Grants therefore run the risk of luring students into colleges they can’t really afford to attend. What’s more, a college degree ain’t what it used to be, both in terms of the education it gets you and the vocational doors it (doesn’t) open. As recent debt-to-earnings research ([link removed]) confirms, many bachelor’s degrees aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on. “[A] good college degree does not guarantee financial stability anymore,” Arnold writes. “In fact, an increasing number of non-bachelor degree holders out-earn those with a college education.”
She continues,
Instead of expanding the Pell Grant program, our time and money would be better spent on implementing policies that improve the quality and accessibility of alternatives to traditional four-year degrees. For example, we could encourage more low-income students who have completed high school to enter skill-based fields. Jobs in these areas are not only in demand, but students will see a faster return on investment. This path gives low-income students an actual chance to climb out of their poor financial conditions.
Simply throwing more taxpayer money at the Pell Grant—or any other student aid program, for that matter—will accomplish nothing. This will just incentivize colleges and universities to raise costs even more, saddling even more low-income students with paralyzing debt in the process. Rather, as Arnold suggests, we ought to “break higher education’s stranglehold on good jobs and social mobility,” and in the meantime encourage students of all incomes to explore other alternatives. Do you want higher learning? If so, apply to college and make wise decisions. If not, the debt-free job market is your oyster.
Until next week.
David Acevedo
Communications & Research Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read More ([link removed])
For more on the student debt crisis and American higher education:
[link removed]
September 15, 2021
** The Student Debt Relief Band-Aid ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Teresa Manning
Student debt forgiveness doesn't resolve the problem of skyrocketing tuition.
[link removed]
June 28, 2021
** How to Fix Federal Student Aid with Income Share Agreements ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Brickman
If students make too little to repay what they borrowed, the college, not taxpayers, should bear the burden.
[link removed]
June 07, 2021
** The Federal Student Loan System Isn't Worth It for Students or Taxpayers ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Neetu Arnold
Policymakers must confront the stark reality that the federal student loan system is hopelessly broken. American students would be better off without it.
[link removed]
February 25, 2021
** Priced Out: What College Costs America ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Neetu Arnold
This report details the spending habits of 50 universities across America and provides perspective from students, parents, and college administrators.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2021 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
