No images? Click here [link removed]

Members of the U.S. Army's 75th Ranger Regiment commemorate the soldiers who scaled the cliffs of Pointe du Hoc during Operation Overlord in Normandy, France, June 5, 2019. (Markus Rauchenberger/U.S. Army)

This week, Americans paid tribute to its veterans whose sacrifice and service throughout U.S. history have kept our country safe and free. Yet without an appreciation and understanding of war and the “warrior ethos” by military and civilian leaders, national security is at risk, writes Hudson Japan Chair Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster [[link removed]] in National Review [[link removed]]. Following the Biden administration’s surrender to the Taliban in Afghanistan, America's warrior ethos may be compromised as veterans ask themselves whether their sacrifice is valued by the leaders under whom they serve.

See key takeaways below, and don't miss McMaster's Veteran's Day op-ed in The Wall Street Journal [[link removed]].

Read the Op-Ed [[link removed]]

Key Quotes

1. Sound Military Strategy Begins in Washington

Warriors fight mainly for one another, but their willingness to sacrifice and ability to overcome fear are based also on their knowledge that they are fighting to realize a worthy, just intention. Understanding that their efforts are meaningful bolsters resilience under conditions of hardship and persistent danger.

That is why flawed policies and strategies originating in Washington can have a debilitating effect on combat units fighting halfway around the world. A true test to determine the soundness of wartime strategy is to ask platoon leaders whether they can explain to their soldiers how the risks they will take or the sacrifices some may make on an operation will contribute to a worthy outcome.

2. The Afghanistan Withdrawal Will Not 'End Endless Wars'

Vice President Joe Biden called President Barack Obama from Baghdad in December 2011 to thank the president for allowing him to “end this goddamn war.” Based on the conceit that wars end when one side disengages, the complete withdrawal from Iraq, however, set conditions for the rise of ISIS less than three years later. In an astonishing failure to learn from even proximate historical experience, the United States withdrew from Afghanistan under the assumption that surrender to the Taliban would be a step toward “ending endless wars.”

3. The Warrior Ethos Is Founded on Combat Effectiveness

Civilian and military leaders must not allow reified postmodernist theories to erode the sacred trust between warriors or diminish the meritocracy and objective realities that are essential to preserving the warrior ethos as the foundation of combat effectiveness. Warriors should be judged by their integrity, trustworthiness, physical toughness, mental resilience, courage, selflessness, and humaneness.

Quotes may have been edited for clarity and length.

Read the Op-Ed [[link removed]] Go Deeper

Honor Veterans by Having the Will to Win a War [[link removed]]

Following America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, the long war against jihadist terrorism is entering a new, more dangerous phase, writes Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster [[link removed]] in The Wall Street Journal. Yet just because the president decided the war was over does not make it so. With new and renewed dangers ahead, America needs our best young men and women to volunteer to serve in the armed forces.

Read [[link removed]]

Biden Administration Needs to Face Reality: China Is an Enemy [[link removed]]

The Pentagon’s just-released, disturbing 2021 China military report reveals how the CCP has gained ground on the U.S., writes Hudson Senior Fellow Rebeccah Heinrichs [[link removed]] in Providence Magazine. The lesson for the U.S. government is clear: America must invest in and deploy the right weapons to deter China, in close collaboration with our Asian allies.

Read [[link removed]]

Memo Mr. Keating: Australia Isn't Crazy Brave on China [[link removed]]

A caricature of Australian strategic policy is that the nation slavishly attaches itself to the dominant Western naval power of the day, writes Hudson Senior Fellow John Lee [[link removed]] in The Australian. But those who believe agreements such as AUKUS are a foolish retreat into the past tend to treat alliances as if they are informal and easily attained. In reality, the confluence of values and interests that ground genuine alliances does not happen easily or quickly.

Read [[link removed]] [[link removed]] Share [link removed] Tweet [link removed] Forward [link removed] Hudson Institute

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Fourth Floor

Washington, D.C. 20004 Preferences [link removed] | Unsubscribe [link removed]