Patriot,

You can tell a lot about a person by how they
treat animals.

I would say we know a lot more about Dr.
Fauci since the White Coat Waste project revealed that under his
direction, the NIAID had funded cruel and deadly experiments on
beagle puppies.

Even worse information came out about what
the federal government had been up to decades prior . . . funding
the testing of experimental AIDS vaccines on orphans, many of
whom died.

Now that same government is using the COVID
crisis, which their funding also likely created through illegal
research in the Wuhan Lab, to create a unique patient identifier
so that we all know who has been vaccinated!

The prohibition on funding for the unique
patient identifier, which I sponsored, has been in place since
1998 and it should stay that way, especially in the era of COVID
mass hysteria, which the media, Big Pharma, and political class
are desperate to exploit for every dollar and every bit of power
they can seize.

And we all know exactly what they do with
those dollars and that power. Look no further than what Fauci has
been funding.

-Ron


_____________


Resist the Unique Patient Identifier!

If people who torture animals are
psychopaths, then what are government officials who use taxpayer
dollars to fund animal torture? Many are asking this question in
the wake of revelations that the National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases, headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci - high
priest of the COVID cult - funded medical "research" involving
the torture of puppies. This led "Fire Fauci" to trend on
Twitter, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
to call for his resignation.

The puppy torture story was followed by
disclosures that the federal government funded the testing of
experimental AIDS vaccines on orphans. Many of the orphans used
as human guinea pigs subsequently died, and nurses who assisted
in these experiments reported that many children got sick
immediately after receiving the vaccines.

Testing dangerous drugs on orphans and
torturing puppies in the name of "science" is certainly shocking,
but is it really surprising that government would fund these
types of activities? What is the difference between using orphans
and puppies for cruel experiments in the name of protecting
public health and killing innocent children in drone attacks in
the name of stopping terrorism?

Ironically, these revelations come when
Congress is on the verge of allowing the federal bureaucracy to
destroy what remains of our medical privacy. Both the Senate and
House versions of the Labor, Education, and Health and Human
Services Appropriations bill remove the prohibition on the
development of a "unique patient identifier."

The prohibition on funding for the unique
patient identifier, which I sponsored, has been in place since
1998. The push to allow the government to force every American to
obtain a unique patient identifier is being justified as a means
to efficiently monitor Americans' "contact and immunization"
status.

When I began fighting the unique patient ID
in the 1990s, my opponents denied that medical identifiers would
make it impossible to ensure confidentiality of medical records.
Now, they are saying we should support medical identifiers
because they allow government officials, employers, schools,
airlines, and even stores and restaurants to discover what, if
any, vaccinations or other medical treatments we have or have not
received. The result of the identifier will be a medical caste
system, where those who refuse to follow the mandates or advice
of the "experts" are denied opportunities to work, receive an
education, or even go to church or enjoy a night out on the town.


A unique patient identifier will weaken
health care by making individuals reluctant to share personal
information-such as drug and alcohol use and past sexual
history-with health care providers. It will also discourage sick
individuals from seeking medical care for fear their physicians
will discover they are unvaccinated, smoke, are overweight, or
engage in other unapproved behaviors.

A unique medical ID could also be tied to
government records of gun purchases. Someone with "too many" guns
could be labeled a potential mental health risk and harassed by
law enforcement. This is especially likely if the gun grabbers
are successful in their push to enact "red flag" laws in every
state.

Fortunately, there is a growing resistance to
vaccines and other mandates. This resistance is unlikely to
passively accept a federally-issued unique patient identifier. If
those of us who know the truth take advantage of the opportunity
presented by the resistance to COVID tyranny, we can not only
stop the scheme to force every American to obtain a "unique
patient identifier" but end all government control of our health
care.

For Liberty,

Dr. Ron Paul
Chairman



If you'd prefer to donate via PayPal, please
click here.


________________________________________________

The mission of Campaign for Liberty is to
promote and defend the great American principles of individual
liberty, constitutional government, sound money, free markets,
and a constitutional foreign policy, by means of education, issue
advocacy, and grassroots mobilization.

Because of Campaign For Liberty's tax-exempt status under IRC
Sec. 501(C)(4) and its state and federal legislative activities,
contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions
(IRC § 170) or as business deductions (IRC §
162(e)(1)).

www.CampaignForLiberty.org





This message was intended for: [email protected]
You were added to the system June 27, 2019 [More
information].
View this email as a web page: [link removed]
Update your preferences |
Unsubscribe [link removed]

----Powered by Paramount Communication----
[link removed]