From Environment Colorado <[email protected]>
Subject Tell the EPA: Don't let polluters freely melt plastic into oil
Date November 5, 2021 1:49 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Friend,

The entire life cycle of plastic is toxic. Plastic is made from oil and gas. Plastic products can choke or even kill our wildlife. Plastic pollution dirties our waters and parks.

But things could get even worse: Right now, plastic producers are melting plastic and turning it back into fuel in a process they call "chemical recycling."[1]

Well, we call it a plastic to fuel pipeline. And right now, you have the chance to help stop this.

As the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accepts comments on regulating the plastic to fuel pipeline, will you add your name to stand up against this practice?
[link removed]

Single-use plastics can contain more than 100,000 chemicals.[2] Now, a process that burns these plastics, emits toxic pollution, and produces more oil to be burned sounds like a bad idea, right?

Well, we can break it down together. Let's say 100 tons of plastic enters a facility. Here's what happens next:

* Processors fire up the engines and begin burning fuel to start melting that plastic.[3]
* At least 50 tons -- more than half -- of the plastic that enters the facility leaves immediately as a form of harmful pollution.[4] Not to mention melting plastic releases toxic ash into our air and sludge that seeps into our water.
* Once all is said and done, voila: the remaining plastics are successfully converted to oil, which will be burned for fuel and worsen the climate crisis.

So ... it's definitely a bad idea. The plastic to fuel pipeline is just pollution stacked on more pollution with a side of climate-warming emissions -- and you don't have to have it.

Tell the EPA: Don't let facilities freely melt plastic into fuel.
[link removed]

We can't forget that enabling these plastic-to-fuel facilities would incentivize producers to make more plastics. More plastics could devastate our vulnerable birds, fish and other wildlife who mistake plastic pollution for food, often with dire consequences.

Facilities operating the plastic to fuel pipeline have already been built in nearly a dozen states -- with more pending.

If this practice moves forward, our air and water will see more toxic pollution, our wildlife will see more plastics in their only home, and our climate will see even more global warming pollution.

Send your public comment to the EPA urging the agency to regulate "chemical recycling" today.
[link removed]

Thank you,

Rex Wilmouth
Senior Program Director

1. Sam Ballingrud, "Clearing the Air: US EPA Looks to Revamp Pyrolysis and Gasification Regulations," The National Law Review, October 19, 2021.
[link removed]
2. Claire Arkin, "Chemical Recycling: Miracle Cure, or Snake Oil?," GAIA, last accessed October 20, 2021.
[link removed]
3. Claire Arkin, "Chemical Recycling: Miracle Cure, or Snake Oil?," GAIA, last accessed October 20, 2021.
[link removed]
4. Claire Arkin, "House Democrats Fall for Fossil Fuel Industry Greenwashing Scheme, "Chemical Recycling" in Climate Plan," GAIA, July 27, 2021.
[link removed]

-----------------------------------------------------------

Donate Today: [link removed]

Join us on Facebook: [link removed]
Follow us on Twitter: [link removed]

Environment Colorado, Inc.
1543 Wazee St., Suite 400, Denver, CO 80202, (303) 573-3871
Member questions or requests call 1-800-401-6511.

If you want us to stop sending you email then follow this link:
[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis