From Matt Bennett, Shield PAC <[email protected]>
Subject A sword vs. a shield
Date October 28, 2021 9:14 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Hey John,

We asked, you answered: Are political ads too negative?

After pouring through everyone's responses, the answer is a resounding "yes."

I get that. I really do. Especially now with radical Republicans promoting dangerous lies with their ads. But on our side, Democrats have a real need for "Sword" ads—a helpful metaphor I'll use to refer to negative ads that go right after the Republicans and hold them accountable.

Sword ads tell swing voters who is to blame for the disjunction in Washington. You've seen these ads a thousand times, lots of scary images inciting fear and a narrator who sounds very, VERY concerned.

But we don't always need to go negative; we've got "Shield" ads in our tool kit too. Positive, informative ads that share a vision of progress and defend reliable leaders from the harmful lies perpetuated by the GOP.

We see some Shield ads, but not nearly enough. That's where we come in.

Shield PAC wants to close the gap because we believe there's astronomical value in elevating truth and driving enthusiasm for leaders we can count on.

But that can't happen without your support at this end-of-month fundraising crunch. Here's the ask: Can I count on you for $5 so we can close both gaps and defend our majority using Shield ads?

DONATE >>> [link removed]

Thanks for hearing me out,

Matt Bennett

Shield PAC



DONATE MONTHLY >>> [link removed]

DONATE ONCE >>> [link removed]




This email was sent to: [email protected]. If you no longer wish to hear from us you can unsubscribe here [[link removed]] .
Paid for by Shield PAC, www.shieldpac.org, and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
Shield PAC
___
Washington, DC 20002
United States
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis