Catherine Lhamon again holds her old role at OCR—campus due process beware
[link removed]
CounterCurrent: Taking A Trip in the Title IX Time Machine
Catherine Lhamon again holds her old role at OCR—campus due process beware
CounterCurrent is the National Association of Scholars’ weekly newsletter, bringing you the biggest issues in academia and our responses to them.
[link removed]
Category: Title IX; Reading Time: ~2 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------
** Featured Article - This Time We're Ready: The Re-Appointment of Catherine Lhamon by Teresa Manning ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Let’s play a game called Guess That Year! Here are some clues: Joe Biden is in the White House. America is still reeling from a devastating economic decline, and we’re gearing up for another round of midterm elections. The Red Sox are up in the American League Championship Series, and the Dodgers are battling it out in the NLCS. Lastly, Catherine Lhamon has just been confirmed as the Education Department’s Assistant Secretary of the Office for Civil Rights.
2013, you say? Is that your final answer? Trick question—it’s actually 2021, as of last week.
That’s right. We’ve taken a trip in the Title IX Time Machine, and the Senate has again confirmed ([link removed]) Lhamon to serve in her old role in the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), a position which she first held from 2013-2016. The New York Times reported ([link removed]) that she “squeaked” through the Senate, a most fitting term given that the vote was a 50-50 party-line tie, broken by Vice President Harris. This was after a deadlock 11-11 Committee vote in August, which would have prevented a full Senate vote unless Majority Leader Schumer invoked special procedures (hint: he did).
What makes the Lhamon nomination so controversial that it would warrant two consecutive tie votes in the Senate? Let’s just say her first rodeo was … questionable, to put it lightly. As National Association of Scholars Policy Director Teresa Manning put it ([link removed]) a couple of months ago,
Lhamon became infamous when she held this same position in the Obama administration where she showed callous disregard for the basic due process rights of those accused of campus sexual misconduct. She enforced the now discredited and withdrawn 2011 Dear Colleague Letter (“DCL”) which lowered the standard of proof in school disciplinary hearings (facilitating findings of fault) and which allowed the withholding of evidence and information from those accused. In effect, it was a green light to railroad accused individuals in the name of fighting the now-debunked “campus rape epidemic.” [emphasis mine]
So her resume is a little spotty. But people change, right? Maybe she’s turned over a new leaf in the last five years. Not quite—in fact, she may have gotten even worse. Here’s Manning again ([link removed]) , after Lhamon’s Committee hearing in July:
It seemed Lhamon could not utter the phrase “presumption of innocence” and instead offered a new variant: “open to the possibility” of innocence.
Lhamon’s ignorance of the current rule’s provision is inexcusable, given the centrality of this issue in the Office she’s been asked to lead. One can hope that she clarifies and corrects herself from this embarrassing mistake soon, but the damage is done. How could such a nominee not know of the provision, when so much attention went to this issue?
In other words, Lhamon completely face-planted in a nationally publicized job interview. This combined with her previous tenure in the role should have disqualified her from any further public service, and yet 50 U.S. senators (not to mention our Vice President) still had the gall to vote “Yea.” It’s clear that Lhamon’s confirmation is politics-over-common-sense par excellence. Right, left, center, or none of the above, there is absolutely no reason why she should serve in this role again. And yet, as Manning writes ([link removed]) , “this time, we’re ready.”
… at least we know what we are getting in Catherine Lhamon and, more important, we know to stand watch, to be prepared, and to fight back at her every attempt to violate the civil rights of students. … Unlike last time, today hundreds of court opinions affirming basic due process rights—such as cross examination of complainants and disclosure of all evidence—are now established case law for most of the country. And this is the case even if the new, laudable Title IX Rule, promulgated by former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, is rescinded by Biden officials.
It’s true—the Title IX landscape really is different this time around. But we can’t let our guard down. Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice …
Until next week.
David Acevedo
Communications & Research Associate
National Association of Scholars
Read More ([link removed])
For more on Title IX and the Department of Education:
[link removed]
August 04, 2021
** Nomination of Catherine Lhamon Fails Senate Committee Vote ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Teresa Manning
In an astonishing turn of events, the Senate Committee on Education fails to garner enough votes to appoint Lhamon to her former position at the Office of Civil Rights.
[link removed]
July 15, 2021
** Lhamon Wobbles on Presumption of Innocence, Undermining Confidence that She Can be Fair ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
Teresa Manning
Catherine Lhamon’s nomination to serve again opens old wounds for victims of the 2011 DCL. Her Senate Committee hearing made matters worse.
[link removed]
May 14, 2021
** Biden Nominee for the Office of Civil Rights Could Reverse Devos’ Due Process Reforms ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
NAS
Lhamon is most known for her involvement with the infamous 2011 Dear Colleague Letter, which transformed Title IX from a civil rights law into a quasi-criminal matter.
[link removed]
March 5, 2018
** A Shameless Title IX Bureaucrat Poses as a Champion of Due Process [Minding the Campus] ([link removed])
------------------------------------------------------------
KC Johnson
We live in an era of political shamelessness. But Catherine Lhamon positioning herself as someone who demanded fair treatment of accused students is nonetheless remarkable.
** About the NAS
------------------------------------------------------------
The National Association of Scholars, founded in 1987, emboldens reasoned scholarship and propels civil debate. We’re the leading organization of scholars and citizens committed to higher education as the catalyst of American freedom.
============================================================
Follow NAS on social media.
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
** Donate ([link removed])
| ** Join ([link removed])
| ** Renew ([link removed])
| ** Bookstore ([link removed])
Copyright © 2021 National Association of Scholars, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, membership or donation forms, contact forms at events, or by signing open letters.
Our mailing address is:
National Association of Scholars
420 Madison Avenue
7th Floor
New York, NY 10017-2418
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
