Ads distort the tax plan's cost to families

View this email in your browser ([link removed])
An update from FactCheck.org
Screen grab from the TV ad targeting Democratic Texas Rep. Filemon Vela.


** Conservative Ads Make Distorted Claims About the Effect of Biden's Tax Proposal
------------------------------------------------------------

President Joe Biden's 2022 budget proposes providing refundable tax credits to low- and middle-income Americans and increasing taxes on high-income earners.

But the impact of the Biden plan on taxpayers was distorted in ads the conservative Club for Growth started airing in mid-September. The ads, which targeted nine vulnerable House Democrats and one centrist House Republican, claimed that the president's plan "could cost your family" thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars.

While that could happen for some, it probably won’t for most.

As Deputy Managing Editor Rob Farley wrote ([link removed]) :

"In the first year of Biden’s proposed budget, 2022, nearly nine out of 10 households would see a tax cut, according to the Tax Policy Center. By the 10th year, 2031, only a quarter of households would be getting a tax cut, but still, most households would, on average, see a tax increase of $430 or less.

"Those with very high incomes, specifically the less than 1% of Americans making over $1 million per year, would bear the majority of the tax increases. Those people could, on average, see tax increases in the hundreds of thousands of dollars."

Some of the ads also used cherry-picked data from the pro-business Tax Foundation, whose analysis actually shows thousands of dollars in average tax savings -- rather than tax increases -- for taxpayers in the congressional districts of four legislators targeted in the ads.

For the full analysis, read "Ads Distort How Much Biden’s Tax Plans Could Cost 'Your Family ([link removed]) .'"
HOW WE KNOW
In a Sept. 28 Senate hearing, we learned ([link removed]) from Gen. Mark Milley and Gen. Kenneth McKenzie that they recommended to President Biden that at least 2,500 U.S. troops should remain in Afghanistan. That contradicts Biden's August claim ([link removed]) that top military advisers made no such recommendation.
FEATURED FACT
The Virginia Supreme Court ruled ([link removed]) unanimously Sept. 2 that the state could remove a controversial Confederate statue honoring Gen. Robert E. Lee from its capital. The monument, erected in 1890, was removed Sept. 8. Read about the statue and the man it memorialized ([link removed]) .
WORTHY OF NOTE
The Annenberg Public Policy Center and FactCheck.org will participate in a new collaboration of nonprofits, academics and fact-checkers, called FACT CHAMP, which is designed to advance scientific understanding of how trust, misinformation, abuse and hateful content affect underrepresented groups. The project is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation's Convergence Accelerator and will initially address misinformation in partnership with Asian American and Pacific Islander communities. Learn more about this important project ([link removed]) .
REPLY ALL

Reader: Is the story about a Harvard epidemiologist who states natural immunity is better than vaccines true?

FactCheck.org Director Eugene Kiely: I believe you are referring to Dr. Martin Kulldorff ([link removed]) , a biostatistician and professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School who has stated his opinion on many ([link removed]) occasions ([link removed]) that ([link removed]) natural immunity ([link removed]) is better than vaccines. He also opposes vaccine mandates ([link removed]) and face masks ([link removed]) for children.

As for natural immunity vs. vaccines, we have written about this several times – most recently earlier this month in our story, “Instagram Post Missing Context About Israeli Study on COVID-19 Natural Immunity ([link removed]) ."

At that time, we wrote: "It’s true that in many cases, natural immunity can provide better protection from certain diseases than immunity from vaccination, as we’ve written before. But we’ve also written about scientific studies that show the benefits of vaccination for those who contracted the coronavirus and then recovered from infection.

"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also recommends that people still get vaccinated regardless of whether they already had COVID-19, because it’s not known how long someone is protected from getting COVID-19 again after recovering from the disease. A small proportion of people who had an infection may not develop much immunity at all."

The CDC says ([link removed]) : "Evidence is emerging that people get better protection by being fully vaccinated compared with having had COVID-19. One study showed that unvaccinated people who already had COVID-19 are more than 2 times as likely than fully vaccinated people to get COVID-19 again."

For more about the benefits of vaccination for those who have contracted SARS-CoV-2, you can read our article, “Vaccines Benefit Those Who Have Had COVID-19, Contrary to Viral Posts ([link removed]) ,” from April.


** Wrapping Up
------------------------------------------------------------

Here's what else we've got for you this week:
* "Generals Contradict Biden on Afghanistan Advice ([link removed]) ": Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Mark Milley and Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, commander of U.S. Central Command, contradicted President Joe Biden’s claim last month that top military advisers didn’t recommend keeping a residual force in Afghanistan.
* "Facebook Posts Distort Robert E. Lee’s Actions and Views on Slavery ([link removed]) ": A statue commemorating Gen. Robert E. Lee was taken down in Richmond, Virginia, on Sept. 8. Days after the statue was removed, Facebook posts about Lee misleadingly claimed he freed his slaves, and a quote from Lee referring to slavery as a “moral evil” is taken out of context, misrepresenting his attitude toward slavery.
* "Trump Rejected Generals’ Advice, Too": Rep. Mike Rogers, the ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, said congressional testimony this week showed that President Joe Biden ignored the advice of top generals about what to do in Afghanistan while former President Donald Trump “did listen to it.” But Trump went against his advisers, too.

Y lo que publicamos en español (English versions are accessible in each story):
* "Mensajes difunden afirmaciones falsas sobre ivermectina y esterilidad masculina ([link removed]) ": La Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos (FDA, por sus siglas en inglés) dice que la infertilidad masculina no es un efecto secundario de la ivermectina, un medicamento antiparasitario. Afirmaciones dudosas de que la medicina esteriliza al 85% de los usuarios varones fueron incorrectamente atribuidas a un estudio cuestionado del 2011 sobre los efectos del fármaco en una muestra pequeña de hombres nigerianos con oncocercosis, una enfermedad tropical también conocida como “ceguera de río”.

* "Publicaciones en redes sociales desinforman sobre vacunas contra el COVID-19 y muertes en Afganistán ([link removed]) ": Afganistán ha implementando un programa de vacunación contra el COVID-19 y, aunque la administración de vacunas se ha retrasado debido a conflictos armados internos, el programa aún está en marcha. Pero algunos destacados conservadores proveedores de desinformación en EE. UU., han hecho afirmaciones falsas sobre los esfuerzos de vacunación y el impacto de la pandemia en Afganistán..

* "Ensayos clínicos en curso decidirán si la ivermectina es (o no) segura y eficaz contra el COVID-19 ([link removed]) ": Los estudios sobre si la ivermectina es beneficiosa en el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19 no han sido concluyentes, por lo que los funcionarios de salud pública han advertido al público no automedicarse. Pero varios ensayos de gran escala continúan evaluando el medicamento antiparasitario. Sin embargo, según informes de prensa el senador Rand Paul dijo que los investigadores “no están dispuestos a estudiarla objetivamente” por “odio” a Donald Trump. Más tarde el senador admitió que sí se están realizando estudios. Aquí revisamos la investigación en curso.

* "Publicación en redes sociales sobre uso de ivermectina en refugiados carece de contexto ([link removed]) ": Los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC, por sus siglas en inglés) recomiendan el uso de ivermectina para tratar infecciones parasitarias en refugiados que llegan a Estados Unidos. Pero en una publicación en las redes sociales la Dra. Simone Gold, quien promueve el uso de ivermectina para tratar el COVID-19, menciona la recomendación de los CDC sin explicar con exactitud la razón por la cual se les da el medicamento a los refugiados. Los CDC han advertido contra el uso de ivermectina para prevenir o tratar el COVID-19.

Have a question about COVID-19 and the vaccines? Visit our SciCheck page ([link removed]) for answers. It's available in Spanish ([link removed]) , too.
Donate to Support Our Work ([link removed])

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
We'll show up in your inbox every Friday with this fact-focused rundown. But you can message us any day of the week with questions or comments: [email protected].
Copyright © 2021 FactCheck.org, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
FactCheck.org
Annenberg Public Policy Center
202 S. 36th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=9e4903c6b5-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_09_29_06_41&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-9e4903c6b5-48392213)
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed][UNIQID]&c=ff9a7620f9&utm_source=FactCheck.org&utm_campaign=9e4903c6b5-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_09_29_06_41&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3294bba774-9e4903c6b5-48392213)
.

This email was sent to [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
why did I get this? ([link removed]) unsubscribe from this list ([link removed]) update subscription preferences ([link removed])
FactCheck.org: A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania . 202 S 36th St. . Philadelphia, Pa 19104 . USA