Redistricting threat to new multiracial America, tips on impacting redistricting hearings

[link removed]

[REDISTRICTING]

Features

The Redistricting Threat to the New Multiracial America

[link removed]

Data released by the Census Bureau

[link removed]

in August showed that for the first time in history, all of the nation’s population growth came from people of color. Some of the most profound demographic changes are taking place in the nation’s suburbs, where over half of people of color in metro areas now live, and where diverse, multiracial coalitions are increasingly contesting for and winning political power. Yet, as the Brennan Center’s Michael Li warned

[link removed]

, “the redrawing of electoral districts after the 2020 Census will give political operatives a chance to kneecap the new multiracial America just as it is being born.” Changing the trajectory of the coming redistricting train wreck for communities of color will require bold, urgent action by Congress, Li said.



Making Effective Comments at Redistricting Hearings

While everyday citizens may think public comments at redistricting hearings are largely ignored, a study

[link removed]

by the Brennan Center’s Peter Miller that examined dozens of hearings during the last redistricting cycle found that nearly half of comments had some impact on final maps. But some comments were far more impactful than others. From thinking small to defining your community, here are six helpful tips

[link removed]

on how to have the biggest impact at redistricting hearings.


Redistricting in the News

With the Senate back from its late summer recess, Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) have introduced a revised voting rights bill called the Freedom to Vote Act

[link removed]

that would make the most significant reforms in history to the way congressional districts are drawn and how disputes about maps are litigated. Read our summary of the changes

[link removed]

. An initial vote on the bill is expected the week of September 20.

Last week, the Ohio Redistricting Commission voted along partisan lines to introduce legislative maps proposed by state senate Republicans for public consideration — more than one week after the September 1 deadline mandated by the Ohio Constitution, enraging many Ohioans

[link removed]

. The plan itself drew fire

[link removed]

for favoring incumbent Republicans and failing to consider the impact of maps on communities of color. The commission faces a September 15 deadline to adopt a final map, though some advocates have urged it to take more time.

In Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott announced that a third special session of the legislature will convene on September 20 to draw legislative and congressional districts and consider several other controversial bills. Two state senators have already filed a lawsuit

[link removed]

and requested a preliminary injunction, hoping that federal judges will intervene and draw the districts instead of the legislature.

A Michigan resident has sued

[link removed]

the state’s Independent Redistricting Commission in anticipation that it will not pass a map before its constitutional deadlines. The commission has been criticized for its slow pace, lack of transparency

[link removed]

, and hiring of professionals

[link removed]

with highly partisan backgrounds.

In Colorado, the Independent Congressional Redistricting Commission’s nonpartisan staff is set to release a revised redistricting plan after their first plan received significant pushback from voters and commissioners

[link removed]

. The commission has until September 28 to finalize a plan before sending it to the state supreme court for review.

Alabama has dropped its lawsuit

[link removed]

challenging the differential privacy policies used by the Census Bureau in 2020 to ensure that census respondents’ identities remain confidential.

On Monday, the Nebraska Legislature entered a special session

[link removed]

to draw legislative and congressional districts. After Democratic and Republican senators could not agree on a single proposal, they agreed to present two maps to the public for comment

[link removed]

Because Republicans do not have enough votes to overcome a filibuster, some have suggested there could be a compromise of the map.

The New York Independent Redistricting Commission unveiled competing Democratic and Republican proposals

[link removed]

for state assembly, state senate and U.S. House districts. The Democratic-controlled state legislature may still reject commission maps and draw its own.

Resources

Draft legislative maps: Alaska

[link removed]

, Arizona

[link removed]

, Colorado

[link removed]

, Idaho

[link removed]

, Illinois House

[link removed]

, Illinois Senate

[link removed]

, Indiana House

[link removed]

, New York

[link removed]

, Ohio

[link removed]

, and Oregon

[link removed]

.

Draft congressional maps: Arizona

[link removed]

, Colorado

[link removed]

, Idaho

[link removed]

, Indiana

[link removed]

, New York

[link removed]

, and Oregon

[link removed]

.

[link removed]

The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that works to reform, revitalize – and when necessary defend – our country’s systems of democracy and justice.





Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law

120 Broadway, Suite 1750

New York, NY 10271

T 646 292 8310

F 212 463 7308

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Want to change how you receive these emails?

You can update your preferences

[link removed]


Want to stop receiving these emails?

Click here to unsubscribe

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]

[link removed]