When it comes to voting rights, being asked to compromise is typically a warning sign. There is no middle ground between the arsonist and the firefighter. Just as we don’t ask the media to compromise their right to publish news stories, we should not require citizens to compromise their rights as voters.

However, the text of the Freedom to Vote Act reveals a surprisingly good voting rights bill.

In my new piece, “My Thoughts on Manchin's Compromise Bill,” I outline the bill’s similarities with the For the People Act in retaining minimum requirements for how states run federal elections, consequently rolling back many of the Republicans’ latest disenfranchisement schemes. I highlight the small, but important details not included in earlier versions and the significant provision of judicial review which will make it easier for all of us fighting in the courts to secure victories for voters.

Put simply, if the new bill is enacted, more citizens will be able to register to vote, vote in person and by mail and have their votes counted. This is a very big step towards protecting our democracy.

Read “My Thoughts on Manchin's Compromise Bill” on Democracy Docket now.

Marc